Abstract
This study investigates the avatar-less embodiment experienced by viewers in cinematic virtual reality (CVR), with a focus on comparing grounded and aerial camera perspectives. We conducted an experiment using a between-subjects design with 63 participants across nine viewing scenarios in a virtual Hogwarts environment. The scenarios systematically manipulated camera height (Grounded or Aerial) and angle (High, Eye level, Low). Participants completed adapted questionnaires measuring embodiment and discomfort. Our analysis reveals pronounced effects of camera positioning on embodiment, with aerial heights eliciting higher embodiment than grounded positions across angles. Low aerial angles further enhanced embodied sensation. Interestingly, adding virtual grounding elements at aerial heights balanced increased stability with slightly reduced embodiment. These empirical findings provide insights to help CVR practitioners optimize default camera settings for crafting appropriately immersive, comfortable VR narrative experiences aligned to specific narrative goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barsam, R., Monahan, D.: Looking at Movies. WW Norton (2015)
Dooley, K.: Storytelling with virtual reality in 360-degrees: a new screen grammar. Stud. Australas. Cinema 11(3), 161–171 (2017)
Dooley, K.: A question of proximity: exploring a new screen grammar for 360-degree cinematic virtual reality. Media Pract. Educ. 21(2), 81–96 (2020)
Dooley, K.: Spatial relationships in 360-degree space: proximity, body orientation and the gaze. In: Cinematic Virtual Reality, pp. 97–110. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72147-3_6
Gonzalez-Franco, M., Peck, T.C.: Avatar embodiment. Towards a standardized questionnaire. Front. Robot. AI 5, 74 (2018)
Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(3), 203–220 (1993)
Keskinen, T., et al.: The effect of camera height, actor behavior, and viewer position on the user experience of 360 videos. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 423–430. IEEE (2019)
Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 21(4), 373–387 (2012)
MacQuarrie, A., Steed, A.: Cinematic virtual reality: evaluating the effect of display type on the viewing experience for panoramic video. In: 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 45–54. IEEE (2017)
Mateer, J.: Directing for cinematic virtual reality: how the traditional film director’s craft applies to immersive environments and notions of presence. J. Media Pract. 18(1), 14–25 (2017)
Pope, V.C., Dawes, R., Schweiger, F., Sheikh, A.: The geometry of storytelling: theatrical use of space for 360-degree videos and virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4468–4478 (2017)
Probst, P.C., Rothe, S., Hussmann, H.: Camera distances and shot sizes in cinematic virtual reality. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, pp. 178–186 (2021)
Rothe, S., Kegeles, B., Allary, M., Hußmann, H.: The impact of camera height in cinematic virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 1–2 (2018)
Rothe, S., Kegeles, B., Hussmann, H.: Camera heights in cinematic virtual reality: how viewers perceive mismatches between camera and eye height. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, pp. 25–34 (2019)
Rothe, S., Sarakiotis, V., Hussmann, H.: Where to place the camera. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 1–2 (2019)
Rothe, S., Zhao, L., Fahrenwalde, A., Hußmann, H.: How to reduce the effort: comfortable watching techniques for cinematic virtual reality. In: De Paolis, L.T., Bourdot, P. (eds.) AVR 2020, Part I. LNCS, vol. 12242, pp. 3–21. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58465-8_1
Schwind, V., Knierim, P., Haas, N., Henze, N.: Using presence questionnaires in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2019)
Yu, Z., Lo, C.H., Niu, M., Liang, H.N.: Comparing cinematic conventions through emotional responses in cinematic VR and traditional mediums. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Technical Communications, pp. 1–4 (2023)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yu, Z., Lo, CH., Yang, G., Liang, HN. (2024). Rethinking Defaults: Examining the Effects of Default Camera Height and Angle on Embodied Presence in Cinematic Virtual Reality. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14702. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60913-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60913-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60912-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60913-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)