Abstract
Bridging rule-based Supply Chain Management (SCM) systems with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) presents a novel approach towards overcoming persistent SCM challenges. This study introduces a novel approach that integrates GenAI with the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model, a widely accepted quasi-ontology in SCM, through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Utilizing Google’s Vertex AI Search as an implementation case in an educational context, we demonstrate the practical application of resulting generative SCM (GenSCM), which seeks to combine the advantages of both symbolic and sub-symbolic AI. Our study contributes to the literature by outlining an approachable pathway for integrating GenAI in SCM, and it provides insights on a domain-specific integration of symbolic and sub-symbolic AI. While the findings illustrate the potential of GenSCM in education, future research is needed on superior SCM problem-solving and operational execution in real-life SCM settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Please see [1]. SCOR, in the current ‘Digital Standard’ version, is a comprehensive and relational, organising SCM processes (orchestrate, plan, order, source, transform, fulfill, return) and mapping them onto a hierarchical taxonomy (strategic to operational), including performance metrics (resilience, economic, sustainability) and human resources (skills, experiences, training), making it a foundation for strategic and operational excellence in SCM.
- 2.
While this does not involve real-time supply chain data analysis and execution, it serves as a suitable environment to test the integration of GenAI with the SCOR model and to explore its capability in understanding the interconnected elements of SCM as empirical evidence of on GenAI in SCM is limited [17].
- 3.
The most well-known information management related issue in SCM is the bullwhip effect, in which small variations in demand amplify through the supply chain, leading to substantial overstock and/or shortages due to a lack of information-sharing and synchronized decisions.
- 4.
To unify data without tooling such as Vertex AI, a common approach is using vector databases, which convert data into vectors for efficient analysis of complex datasets across different data types.
References
SCOR Digital Standard. https://scor.ascm.org. Accessed 05 Sept 2023
Jackson, T.W., Farzaneh, P.: Theory-based model of factors affecting information overload. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 32(6), 523–532 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.04.006
Birou, L., Hoek, R.V.: Supply chain management talent: the role of executives in engagement, recruitment, development and retention. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 27(6), 712–727 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2020-0418
Baah, C., et al.: Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking: Int. J. 29(2), 434–455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0453
Sodhi, M.S., Tang, C.S.: Supply chain management for extreme conditions: research opportunities. J. Supply Chain Manag. 57(1), 7–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12255
Sharma, M., Alkatheeri, H., Jabeen, F., Sehrawat, R.: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on perishable food supply chain management: a contingent resource-based view (RBV) perspective. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 33(3), 796–817 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0131
Cannas, V.G., Ciano, M.P., Saltalamacchia, M., Secchi, R.: Artificial intelligence in supply chain and operations management: a multiple case study research. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2232050
Stank, T., Esper, T., Goldsby, T.J., Zinn, W., Autry, C.: Toward a digitally dominant paradigm for twenty-first century supply chain scholarship. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 49(10), 956–971 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2019-0076
Richey, R.G., Jr., Chowdhury, S., Davis-Sramek, B., Giannakis, M., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: a primer and roadmap for research. J. Bus. Logist. 44, 532–549 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12364
Hendriksen, C.: Artificial intelligence for supply chain management: disruptive innovation or innovative disruption? J. Supply Chain Manag. 59(3), 65–76 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12304
Hearnshaw, E.J.S., Wilson, M.M.J.: A complex network approach to supply chain network theory. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 33(4), 442–469 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571311307343
Camargo, L.R., Pereira, S.C.F., Scarpin, M.R.S.: Fast and ultra-fast fashion supply chain management: an exploratory research. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 48(6), 537–553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2019-0133
Pournader, M., Kach, A., Talluri, S.: A review of the existing and emerging topics in the supply chain risk management literature. Decis. Sci. 51, 867–919 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12470
Spieske, A., Gebhardt, M., Kopyto, M., Birkel, H.: Improving resilience of the healthcare supply chain in a pandemic: evidence from Europe during the COVID-19 crisis. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 28(5), 100748 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100748
Bednarski, L., Roscoe, S., Blome, C., Schleper, M.C.: Geopolitical disruptions in global supply chains: a state-of-the-art literature review. Prod. Plan. Control (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2286283
Dai, T., Tang, C.: Frontiers in service science: integrating ESG measures and supply chain management: research opportunities in the postpandemic era. Serv. Sci. 14(1), 1–12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2021.0295
Fosso Wamba, S., Guthrie, C., Queiroz, M.M., Minner, S.: ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence: an exploratory study of key benefits and challenges in operations and supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2294116
Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need (2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
Cheng, H.T., Thoppilan, R.: LaMDA: towards safe, grounded, and high-quality dialog models for everything. https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/01/lamda-towards-safe-grounded-and-high.html. Accessed 05 Sept 2023
Kadavath, S., et al.: Language models (mostly) know what they know (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.05221
Ouyang, L., et al.: Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.02155
GCP: Hey Google, what’s up with generative AI? https://cloudonair.withgoogle.com/events/gen-ai-for-startups. Accessed 05 Sept 2023
Ortega, P.A., et al.: Shaking the foundations: delusions in sequence models for interaction and control (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.10819
Krinkin, K., Shichkina, Y.: Cognitive architecture for co-evolutionary hybrid intelligence. In: Goertzel, B., Iklé, M., Potapov, A., Ponomaryov, D. (eds.) AGI 2022. LNCS, vol. 13539, pp. 293–303. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19907-3_28
Birou, L., Lutz, H., Walden, J.L.: Undergraduate supply chain management courses: Content, coverage, assessment and gaps. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 27(1), 1–11 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2020-0309
GCP: Vertex AI. https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai. Accessed 05 Sept 2023
Lewis, P., et al.: Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020), vol. 33, 9459–9474 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5555/3495724.3496517
GCP: Model Information. https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/generative-ai/learn/models. Accessed 05 Sept 2023
Dhuliawala, S., et al.: Chain-of-verification reduces hallucination in large language models (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.11495
Wei, J., et al.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903
Caufield, J.H., et al.: Structured prompt interrogation and recursive extraction of semantics (SPIRES): a method for populating knowledge bases using zero-shot learning. Bioinformatics 40(3), btae104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae104
Ahn, M., et al.: AutoRT: embodied foundation models for large scale orchestration of robotic agents (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.12963
Pan, S., Luo, L., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Wang, J., Wu, X.: Unifying large language models and knowledge graphs: a roadmap. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (TKDE) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2024.3352100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ehrenthal, J.C.F., Gachnang, P., Loran, L., Rahms, H., Schenker, F. (2024). Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into Supply Chain Management Education Using the SCOR Model. In: Almeida, J.P.A., Di Ciccio, C., Kalloniatis, C. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops. CAiSE 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 521. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61003-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61003-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61002-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61003-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)