Skip to main content

Improving Construction Safety: The Role of Workplace Stressors and Personality Traits on Near-Miss Recognition of Workers’

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management (HCII 2024)

Abstract

The construction industry, despite safety enhancements, remains hazardous. Hazard identification and near-miss reporting are pivotal in preventing accidents. However, the dynamic nature of construction work and workplace stress can impede safety recognition ability. Despite previous studies employing stress loading to assess workers’ safety behavior and its influence on hazard recognition among construction workers, there has been no empirical investigation into the direct impact of mental and auditory stressors on workers’ psychophysiological indicators during near-miss recognition activities. This study investigates the impact of personality traits and stress on construction workers’ cognitive abilities during near-miss recognition tasks. Thirty-five participants underwent an eye-tracking experiment with mental and auditory stressors. Personality traits were assessed through self-reported questionnaires, while physiological data were collected using wearable devices. Results revealed increased stress levels during stressor trials, significantly affecting cognitive load and visual attention. Workers with low conscientiousness and openness/intellect exhibited heightened attention to “fatal four” near-miss opportunities. The findings emphasize the influence of workplace stressors on construction workers’ cognitive abilities during near-miss recognition and establish a significant relationship between personality traits and performance in recognizing near-miss incidents. This study provides evidence supporting the development of personalized training programs tailored to at-risk individuals. By addressing specific personality traits associated with lower near-miss identification abilities, these tailored programs aim to enhance workers’ recognition skills. Therefore, the contribution from this study would work towards fostering a robust safety culture within the construction sector, aligning to achieve zero incidents and promote overall workplace safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waehrer, G.M., et al.: Costs of occupational injuries in construction in the United States. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39(6), 1258–1266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. CPWR. Construction Focus Four (2022). https://www.cpwr.com/research/data-center/data-dashboards/construction-focus-four-dashboard/

  3. Burke, M.J., et al.: General safety performance: a test of a grounded theoretical model. Pers. Psychol. 55(2), 429–457 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00116.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasanzadeh, S., et al.: Role of personality in construction safety: investigating the relationships between personality, attentional failure, and hazard identification under fall-hazard conditions. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 145(9) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001673

  5. Pooladvand, S., Hasanzadeh, S.: Impacts of stress on workers’ risk-taking behaviors: cognitive tunneling and impaired selective attention. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 149(8), 04023060 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1061/Jcemd4.Coeng-13339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw, M.L., Shaw, P.: Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 3(2), 201–211 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.3.2.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paas, F.G.W.C., Vanmerrienboer, J.J.G.: Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills - a cognitive-load approach. J. Educ. Psychol. 86(1), 122–133 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, J., et al.: Evaluating the impact of mental fatigue on construction equipment operators’ ability to detect hazards using wearable eye-tracking technology. Autom. Constr. 105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102835

  9. Kaber, D., et al.: The effect of driver cognitive abilities and distractions on situation awareness and performance under hazard conditions. Transp. Res. Part F-Traffic Psychol. Behav. 42, 177–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang, Q., et al.: Unveiling the mechanism of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors from an occupational stress perspective: a qualitative and quantitative examination of a stress–cognition–safety model. Saf. Sci. 145, 105486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hockey, G.R.: Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. Biol. Psychol. 45(1–3), 73–93 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arezes, P.M., Miguel, A.S.: Risk perception and safety behaviour: a study in an occupational environment. Saf. Sci. 46(6), 900–907 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, A., Wellens, B.: Noise and occupational health and safety. In: First European Forum on Efficient Solutions for Managing Occupational Noise Risks, Noise at work (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leung, M.-Y., Chan, I.Y.S., Yu, J.: Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors. Accid. Anal. Prev. 48, 156–166 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jebelli, H., Choi, B., Lee, S.: Application of wearable biosensors to construction sites. II: assessing workers’ physical demand. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 145(12), 04019080 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)Co.1943-7862.0001710

  16. Habibnezhad, M., et al.: Comparison of ironworker’s fall risk assessment systems using an immersive biofeedback simulator. Autom. Constr. 122, 103471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Q., et al.: Visual attention and cognitive process in construction hazard recognition: study of fixation-related potential. Autom. Constr. 148, 104756 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, Y., et al.: Robust segmentation and localization of structural planes from photogrammetric point clouds in construction sites. Autom. Constr. 117, 103206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perlman, A., Sacks, R., Barak, R.: Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf. Sci. 64, 22–31 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rauthmann, J.F., et al.: Eyes as windows to the soul: gazing behavior is related to personality. J. Res. Pers. 46(2), 147–156 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M.: Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science 143(3611), 1190–1192 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3611.1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M.: Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 132(3423), 349–350 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.132.3423.349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahneman, D.: Attention and effort, vol. 1063. Citeseer (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fu, H., et al.: Influence of cues on the safety hazard recognition of construction workers during safety training: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. J. Civil Eng. Educ. 150(1), 04023009 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEECD.EIENG-1882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, X., Xue, C., Zhou, F.: An experimental study on visual search factors of information features in a task monitoring interface. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9171, pp. 525–536. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Griethuijsen, R.A., et al.: Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Res. Sci. Educ. 45, 581–603 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shashank Muley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Muley, S., Wang, C. (2024). Improving Construction Safety: The Role of Workplace Stressors and Personality Traits on Near-Miss Recognition of Workers’. In: Duffy, V.G. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14711. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61066-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61066-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61065-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61066-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics