Abstract
The construction industry, despite safety enhancements, remains hazardous. Hazard identification and near-miss reporting are pivotal in preventing accidents. However, the dynamic nature of construction work and workplace stress can impede safety recognition ability. Despite previous studies employing stress loading to assess workers’ safety behavior and its influence on hazard recognition among construction workers, there has been no empirical investigation into the direct impact of mental and auditory stressors on workers’ psychophysiological indicators during near-miss recognition activities. This study investigates the impact of personality traits and stress on construction workers’ cognitive abilities during near-miss recognition tasks. Thirty-five participants underwent an eye-tracking experiment with mental and auditory stressors. Personality traits were assessed through self-reported questionnaires, while physiological data were collected using wearable devices. Results revealed increased stress levels during stressor trials, significantly affecting cognitive load and visual attention. Workers with low conscientiousness and openness/intellect exhibited heightened attention to “fatal four” near-miss opportunities. The findings emphasize the influence of workplace stressors on construction workers’ cognitive abilities during near-miss recognition and establish a significant relationship between personality traits and performance in recognizing near-miss incidents. This study provides evidence supporting the development of personalized training programs tailored to at-risk individuals. By addressing specific personality traits associated with lower near-miss identification abilities, these tailored programs aim to enhance workers’ recognition skills. Therefore, the contribution from this study would work towards fostering a robust safety culture within the construction sector, aligning to achieve zero incidents and promote overall workplace safety.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Waehrer, G.M., et al.: Costs of occupational injuries in construction in the United States. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39(6), 1258–1266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.012
CPWR. Construction Focus Four (2022). https://www.cpwr.com/research/data-center/data-dashboards/construction-focus-four-dashboard/
Burke, M.J., et al.: General safety performance: a test of a grounded theoretical model. Pers. Psychol. 55(2), 429–457 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00116.x
Hasanzadeh, S., et al.: Role of personality in construction safety: investigating the relationships between personality, attentional failure, and hazard identification under fall-hazard conditions. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 145(9) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001673
Pooladvand, S., Hasanzadeh, S.: Impacts of stress on workers’ risk-taking behaviors: cognitive tunneling and impaired selective attention. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 149(8), 04023060 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1061/Jcemd4.Coeng-13339
Shaw, M.L., Shaw, P.: Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 3(2), 201–211 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.3.2.201
Paas, F.G.W.C., Vanmerrienboer, J.J.G.: Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills - a cognitive-load approach. J. Educ. Psychol. 86(1), 122–133 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122
Li, J., et al.: Evaluating the impact of mental fatigue on construction equipment operators’ ability to detect hazards using wearable eye-tracking technology. Autom. Constr. 105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102835
Kaber, D., et al.: The effect of driver cognitive abilities and distractions on situation awareness and performance under hazard conditions. Transp. Res. Part F-Traffic Psychol. Behav. 42, 177–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.014
Liang, Q., et al.: Unveiling the mechanism of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors from an occupational stress perspective: a qualitative and quantitative examination of a stress–cognition–safety model. Saf. Sci. 145, 105486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105486
Hockey, G.R.: Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. Biol. Psychol. 45(1–3), 73–93 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4
Arezes, P.M., Miguel, A.S.: Risk perception and safety behaviour: a study in an occupational environment. Saf. Sci. 46(6), 900–907 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.11.008
Smith, A., Wellens, B.: Noise and occupational health and safety. In: First European Forum on Efficient Solutions for Managing Occupational Noise Risks, Noise at work (2007)
Leung, M.-Y., Chan, I.Y.S., Yu, J.: Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors. Accid. Anal. Prev. 48, 156–166 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.017
Jebelli, H., Choi, B., Lee, S.: Application of wearable biosensors to construction sites. II: assessing workers’ physical demand. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 145(12), 04019080 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)Co.1943-7862.0001710
Habibnezhad, M., et al.: Comparison of ironworker’s fall risk assessment systems using an immersive biofeedback simulator. Autom. Constr. 122, 103471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103471
Zhang, Q., et al.: Visual attention and cognitive process in construction hazard recognition: study of fixation-related potential. Autom. Constr. 148, 104756 (2023)
Xu, Y., et al.: Robust segmentation and localization of structural planes from photogrammetric point clouds in construction sites. Autom. Constr. 117, 103206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103206
Perlman, A., Sacks, R., Barak, R.: Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf. Sci. 64, 22–31 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.019
Rauthmann, J.F., et al.: Eyes as windows to the soul: gazing behavior is related to personality. J. Res. Pers. 46(2), 147–156 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.010
Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M.: Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science 143(3611), 1190–1192 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3611.1190
Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M.: Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 132(3423), 349–350 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.132.3423.349
Kahneman, D.: Attention and effort, vol. 1063. Citeseer (1973)
Fu, H., et al.: Influence of cues on the safety hazard recognition of construction workers during safety training: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. J. Civil Eng. Educ. 150(1), 04023009 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEECD.EIENG-1882
Wu, X., Xue, C., Zhou, F.: An experimental study on visual search factors of information features in a task monitoring interface. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9171, pp. 525–536. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_50
Van Griethuijsen, R.A., et al.: Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Res. Sci. Educ. 45, 581–603 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Muley, S., Wang, C. (2024). Improving Construction Safety: The Role of Workplace Stressors and Personality Traits on Near-Miss Recognition of Workers’. In: Duffy, V.G. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14711. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61066-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61066-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61065-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61066-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)