Skip to main content

Theorizing the Lean Startup Approach: Towards Well-Grounded Design Principles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Science Research for a Resilient Future (DESRIST 2024)

Abstract

The lean startup approach and its principles are increasingly gaining relevance in entrepreneurial theory and practice. At the same time, key principles such as ‘pivoting’ and the ‘build-measure-learn cycle’ remain under-theorized. This hurts the clarity of these concepts, and it hinders more effective use of them in practice. We tackle both issues in this article. First, we draw on action regulation theory to theorize the practice concepts of ‘pivoting,’ as well as of the ‘build-measure-learn cycle.’ Subsequently, we build on this theorizing to develop theoretically grounded design principles. This article contributes to literature in two ways. First, theorizing the lean startup principles improves the clarity of the focal concepts and helps to understand why, for whom, and when they work. Second, the developed design principles contribute to the increasing body of design knowledge which provides scientifically grounded guidance for entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hampel, C.E., Tracey, P., Weber, K.: The art of the pivot: how new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction. Acad. Manag. J. 63(2), 440–471 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghezzi, A.: Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of lean startup approaches: effectuation, bricolage and opportunity creation in practice. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.017

  3. Grimes, M.G.: The pivot: how founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Manag. J. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ries, E.: The Lean Startup by Eric Ries. The Starta (2016). https://doi.org/23

  5. Ones, D., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., Sinangil, H., Zacher, H., et al.: Action Regulation Theory: Foundations, Current Knowledge and Future Directions. The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology (2017). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914957.n7

  6. Berglund, H., Dimov, D., Wennberg, K.: Beyond bridging rigor and relevance: the three-body problem in entrepreneurship J. Bus. Ventur. Insights (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.02.001

  7. Romme, A.G.L., Reymen, I.M.: Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: toward an inclusive framework. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 10, e00094 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frese, M., Zapf, D.: Action as the Core of Work Psychology: A German Approach. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 4 (2nd Ed.) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frese, M.: Toward a psychology of entrepreneurship - an action theory perspective. Found. Trends Entrep. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campos, F., et al.: Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa. Science 357(6357), 1287–1290 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glaub, M.E., Frese, M., Fischer, S., Hoppe, M.: Increasing personal initiative in small business managers or owners leads to entrepreneurial success: a theory-based controlled randomized field intervention for evidence-based management. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 13(3) (2014). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0234

  12. Seckler, C., Mauer, R., vom Brocke, J.: Design science in entrepreneurship: conceptual foundations and guiding principles. J. Bus. Ventur. Des. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvd.2022.100004

  13. van Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J. Manag. Stud. (2004).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x

  14. Suddaby, R.: Editor’s comments: construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Acad. Manag. Rev. (2010).https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.51141319

  15. Dimov, D.: Toward a design science of entrepreneurship Models of start-up thinking and action: theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches: Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Veenman, M.V.J., van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., Afflerbach, P.: Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learn. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

  17. Austin, J.T., Vancouver, J.B.: Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process, and content. Psychol. Bull. 120(3) (1996). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338

  18. Zacher, H., Hacker, W., Frese, M.: Action regulation across the adult lifespan (ARAL): a metatheory of work and aging. Work, Aging and Retirement (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw015

  19. Gollwitzer, P.M.: Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am. Psychol. 54(7) (1999). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493

  20. Keith, N., Frese, M.: Self-regulation in error management training: emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. J. Appl. Psychol. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hacker, W.: Action regulation theory: a practical tool for the design of modern work processes? Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 12(2) (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000075

  22. Hacker, W.: Action regulation theory and occupational psychology: review of German empirical research since 1987. Ger. J. Psychol. 18(2) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hacker, W., Sachse, P.: Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie. Allgmeine Arbeitspsychologie (2013). https://elibrary.hogrefe.com/book/99.110005/9783840925405

  24. Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., Sager, C.E.: A theory of performance. Personnel Selection In Organizations (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dörner, D., Schaub, H.: Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Appl. Psychol. 43(4) (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1994.tb00839.x

  26. Bamberger, P.: Beyond contextualization: using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Acad. Manag. J. (2008). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789630

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Seckler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sielski, K., Seckler, C. (2024). Theorizing the Lean Startup Approach: Towards Well-Grounded Design Principles. In: Mandviwalla, M., Söllner, M., Tuunanen, T. (eds) Design Science Research for a Resilient Future. DESRIST 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61175-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61175-9_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61174-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61175-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics