Skip to main content

Evaluating the Student eXperience: A Scale that Includes Cultural Dimensions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media (HCII 2024)

Abstract

Student eXperience (SX) is a particular case of Customer Experience (CX). SX refers to all perceptions and reactions, both physical and emotional, that a student or future student experiences in response to interaction with the various products, systems or services provided by a Higher Education Institution (HEI). Proper SX management allows increasing student satisfaction, which is related to student retention and satisfaction, in addition to the HEIs perceived quality ultimately related to their strategic advantage. It is for this reason that the SX evaluation is of great relevance. It is precisely for this reason that we have proposed to develop an evaluation scale to detect the HEI’s main strengths and weaknesses considering cultural aspects, which are not usually considered when analyzing the undergraduate student's journey. The development of our scale is based on dimensions of SX and national culture models. This work details the development and validation process of this tool. The validation consists of expert’s feedback as well as with statistical methods. Experts were from multiple cultural contexts, areas of specialization and gender. Furthermore, by working based on theoretical models we make sure that the approach proposed to the diagnostic processes for students was appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matus, N., Rusu, C., Botella, F.: Proposing a SX model with cultural factors. Appl. Sci. 13(6), 3713 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw Hill, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hofstede, G.: Cultureʼs Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 9241-210. Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction—Part 210: Human-centered Design for Interactive Systems. International Organization for Standardization (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen Norman Group. How Channels, Devices, and Touchpoints Impact the Customer Journey. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/channels-devices-touchpoints/. Accessed 14 Dec 2023

  6. Hill, N., Roche, G., Allen, L.: Customer Satisfaction. The Customer Experience Through the Customer’s Eye, 1st edn. Cogent Publishing, Abingdon (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gentile, C., Spiller, N., Noci, G.: How to sustain the customer experience: an overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. Eur. Manag. J. 25, 395–410 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemon, K.N., Verhoef, P.C.: Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. J. Mark. 80, 69–96 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sujata, J.: Customer experience management: an exploratory study on the parameters affecting customer experience forcellular mobile services of a telecom company. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 133, 392–399 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haselgrove, S.: The Student Experience. Open University Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bates, E.A., Kaye, L.K., McCann, J.J.: A snapshot of the student experience: exploring student satisfaction through the use of photographic elicitation. J. Furth. High. Educ. 43, 291–304 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harvey, L., Knight, P.T.: Transforming Higher Education: Society for Research into Higher Education. Open University Press, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arambewela, R., Maringe, F.: Mind the gap: staff and postgraduate perceptions of student experience in higher education. High. Educ. Rev. 44, 63–83 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matus, N., Rusu, C., Cano, S.: Student eXperience: a systematic literature review. Appl. Sci. 11(20), 9543 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. UNESCO. Higher Education and the SDGs. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/the-contribution-of-higher-education-to-the-sdgs/. Accessed 14 Dec 2023

  16. UNESCO. The 17 Goals: Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed 14 Dec 2023

  17. McInnis, C.: Studies of student life: an overview. Eur. J. Educ. 39, 383–394 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lysgaard, S.: Adjustment in a foreign society: norwegian fulbright grantees visiting the United States. Int. Soc. Sci. Bull. 7, 45–51 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gullahorn, J.T., Gullahorn, J.E.: An extension of the u-curve hypothesis. J. Soc. Sci. 19(3), 33–47 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matus, N., Rusu, C., Botella, F.: Towards well-being and inclusion in the educational system: a preliminary methodology for evaluating student eXperience considering cultural factors. In: Coman, A., Vasilache, S. (eds.) Social Computing and Social Media. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 14026. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35927-9_8

  21. Rodríguez-Rivero, R., Ortiz-Marcos, I., E. Patiño-Arenas, V.: Exploring the influence of culture in the present and future of multicultural organizations: comparing the case of Spain and Latin America. Sustainability 14(4), 2327 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042327

  22. National Student Survey. https://www.thestudentsurvey.com/. Accessed 14 Dec 2023

  23. Office for Students UK. Questionnaires for NSS 2023 and 2022. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/4bbda46a-b4b8-498d-8797-67d66dd2d910/nss-2023-annex-a-nss-2023-and-nss-2022-core-questionnaires-december-2022.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2023

  24. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22(140), 55 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Culture Factor Group. Country Comparison Tool. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison-tool/. Accessed 14 Dec 2023

  27. Mann, H.B., Whitney, D.R.: On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 50–60 (1947)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the School of Informatics Engineering of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (PUCV) and the Universidad Miguel-Hernández de Elche (UMH). Nicolás Matus is a beneficiary of ANID-PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2023–21230171, in Chile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolás Matus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Matus, N., Rusu, V., Rusu, C., Botella, F. (2024). Evaluating the Student eXperience: A Scale that Includes Cultural Dimensions. In: Coman, A., Vasilache, S. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14704. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61305-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61305-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61304-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61305-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics