Skip to main content

Observation and Reflection: The Behavioral Fields of UX Industry and Its Dilemma

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14716))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 513 Accesses

Abstract

The pursuit of a common theoretical framework of User Experience (UX) is challenging but important, as Experience Design, being an emerging and rapidly evolving discipline, encompasses diverse backgrounds, hindering the establishment of universally accepted principles. Our study aims to identify potential strategies to navigate this dilemma. We conduct a qualitative examination of the UX industry over the past decade, revealing that the conventional industry and academic perspectives often overlook behavioral fields indirectly related to UX practice. These fields, however, unveil crucial underlying factors that impede the development of a unified UX theory. Our findings highlight the need for directed efforts to overcome the obstacles in theory-building and provide a comprehensive overview of the eight behavioral fields relevant to UX. This serves to contextualize hidden causal factors and offers a panoramic view of the UX industry, laying a foundation for the development of a unified UX theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - A research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25, 91–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. VelsenThea, L.V., GeestThea, V., Klaassen, R., et al.: User-centered evaluation of adaptive and adaptable systems: a literature review. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23(03), 261–281 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Law, L.C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., et al.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, USA, 4–9 April 2009

    Google Scholar 

  4. Desmet, P., Hekkert, P.: Framework of product experience. National Sci. Council Taipei 1(1), 57–66 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfgang, I.: How to Do Theory, 1st edn., pp. 154–196. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing, China (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thoring, K., Mueller, R.M., Desmet, P., et al.: Toward a unified model of design knowledge. Des. Issues 2, 38 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benz, P.: Experience Design Concepts and Case Studies, 1st ed. Bloomsbury: London, British; p. 171 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, C.: Critique of artificial reason intelligence: phenomenological reflection on Dreyfus’philosophy of artificial intelligence. J. Chongqing Univ. Technol. (Social Science) 12, 9–20 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pirozelli, P., João, F.N.: The beauty everywhere: how aesthetic criteria contribute to the development of AI. In: Proceedings on “I (Still) Can't Believe It's Not Better!” at NeurIPS 2021 Workshops, 12 Dec (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Husserl, E.: Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, pp. 120–126. Routledge, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Englander, M., Morley, J.: Phenomenological psychology and qualitative research. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 22, 25–53 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiang, B.: Global “Body Shopping”: An Indian Labor System in the Information Technology Industry, pp.15–16. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ravitch, S.M., Mittenfelner Carl, N.: Qualitative Research: Bridging the Conceptual, Theoretical, and Methodological, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2019; pp. 34–39 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aurini J.; Heath M.; Howells S. The How To of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed; SAGE Publications Ltd:Vilnius, Lithuania, 2022; pp. 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  15. Denzin, N.K.: The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 10(4), 277–279 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frederick W., et al.: Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: phenomenological psychology, grounded Theory, discourse, pp. 130–135. Guilford Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rangarajan, V., Onkar, P.S., Barron, K.D.: A descriptive phenomenological approach to perception of affective quality in design inspiration. Design Stud. 78, 101072 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, J.A.: Interpretative phenomenological analysis: getting at lived experience. J. Positive Psychol. 12(3), 1–2 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Costello, P.J.: Action Research. Bloomsbury, London, British, pp. 203–206 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychol. Bull. 51(4), 327–358 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dan, Z.: Phenomenology: The Basics, 1st edn., pp. 154–196. Routledge, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xue, H., Desmet, P.: Researcher introspection for experience-driven design research. Des. Stud. 63, 3 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wunker, S.M., Wattman, J., David, F.: Jobs to Be Done: A Roadmap for Customer-Centered Innovation, AMACOM, New York, USA, pp. 38–46 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Buccini, M., Padovani, S.: Typology of the experiences. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products & Interfaces. Helsinki, Finland, 22–25 August 2007

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hendrik, N.J.: Product Experience, 1st edn., pp. 136–142. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. II B., Gilmore J.H.: The Experience Economy, With a New Preface by the Authors: Competing for Customer Time, Attention, and Money, 1st edn., pp. 78–85. Harvard Business Press, Boston, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hussein, I., Mahmud1, M., Tap, A.: A survey of user experience practice: A point of meet between academic and industry. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), Shah Alam, Malaysia, 2–5 Sep (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Explore, C.I.: Understand. Share and Show How: Four ways to use hermeneutic phenomenology to inspire human-centred creativity in engineering design, Akademisk kvarter/Academic Quarter 09, 291–307 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wakkary, R.: Two years or more of co-speculation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29(5), 1–44 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingpeng Jia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jia, J., Dong, X. (2024). Observation and Reflection: The Behavioral Fields of UX Industry and Its Dilemma. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Soares, M.M. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14716. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61362-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61362-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61361-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61362-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics