Skip to main content

Exploring ICS/SCADA Network Vulnerabilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust (HCII 2024)

Abstract

This paper investigates vulnerabilities in the University of South Carolina Aiken (USCA) Centre’s IP infrastructure, focusing on ICS/SCADA network security. The study follows a systematic approach, incorporating the CIS (Center for Internet Security) security controls methodology throughout the project phases, including asset identification, vulnerability assessment, risk assessment, and flexibility study. The asset identification phase utilized tools such as Nmap, Maltego and Lansweeper to comprehensively identify and catalog assets within the network. Subsequently, the vulnerability assessment phase employed tools like OpenVAS, Nexpose, Nessus and manual penetration testing to uncover potential weaknesses. The research team then conducted a risk assessment using the FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) Methodology to quantitatively analyze and prioritize identified risks. In parallel, a flexibility study was undertaken to assess the system’s adaptability to potential threats. Collaborating with the technology service department(TSD), the research team addressed the identified vulnerabilities. This research paper provides a thorough exploration of ICS/SCADA network vulnerabilities, offering insights into the effectiveness of the CIS security controls methodology in enhancing cybersecurity measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Samtani, S., Yu, S., Zhu, H., Patton, M., Chen, H.: Identifying SCADA vulnerabilities using passive and active vulnerability assessment techniques. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), pp. 25–30. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nankya, M., Chataut, R., Akl, R.: Securing industrial control systems: components, cyber threats, and machine learning-driven defense strategies. Sensors 23(21), 8840 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaura, C., Sindhwani, N., Chaudhary, A.: Analysing the impact of cyber-threat to ICS and SCADA systems. In: 2022 International Mobile and Embedded Technology Conference (MECON), pp. 466–470. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Francia III, G. A., Thornton, D., Dawson, J.: Security best practices and risk assessment of SCADA and industrial control systems. In: Proceedings of the international conference on security and management (SAM), p. 1. The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shypovskyi, V.: Enhancing the factor analysis of information risk methodology for assessing cyberresilience in critical infrastructure information systems. Polit. Sci. Secur. Stud. J. 4(1), 25–33 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, K.K., Petersen, K.L.: Public-private partnerships on cyber security: a practice of loyalty. Int. Aff. 93(6), 1435–1452 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tunggal, A.T.: How to Perform a Cybersecurity Risk Assessment. UpGuard (2018). Accessed 19 Oct 2023. https://www.upguard.com/blog/how-to-perform-a-cybersecurity-risk-assessment

  8. Cybersecurity risk assessments. SailPoint (2023). Accessed 19 Oct 2023. https://www.sailpoint.com/identity-library/cybersecurity-risk-assessments/

  9. Stefinko, Y., Piskozub, A., Banakh, R.: Manual and automated penetration testing. Benefits and drawbacks: modern tendency. In: 2016 13th International Conference on Modern Problems of Radio Engineering, Telecommunications and Computer Science (TCSET), pp. 488–491. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alavi, S., Bessler, N., Massoth, M.: A comparative evaluation of automated vulnerability scans versus manual penetration tests on false-negative errors. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cyber-Technologies and Cyber-Systems, IARIA, Athens, Greece, pp. 18–22 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cremer, F., et al.: Cyber risk and cybersecurity: a systematic review of data availability. Geneva Papers Risk Insur.-Issues Pract. 47(3), 698–736 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnston, A.C.: A closer look at organizational cybersecurity research trending topics and limitations. Organ. Cybersecur. J. Pract. Process People 2(2), 124–133 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hala Strohmier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Strohmier, H., Londhe, A.R., Clark, C.A., Pawar, R., Kram, B. (2024). Exploring ICS/SCADA Network Vulnerabilities. In: Moallem, A. (eds) HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14729. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61382-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61382-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61381-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61382-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics