Skip to main content

The Influence of Learning Styles on the Perception of Lean Implementation Effectiveness by Employees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Challenging the Future with Lean (ELEC 2023)

Abstract

Despite the well-known effects and benefits that Lean Management (LM) methodologies potentially bring to manufacturing companies, many firms still struggle with enabling the full potential of LM practices, thus reaching the desired effects. Motivation represents a crucial factor in setting in motion the cycle of continuous improvement and achieving considerable results over the long term. Ensuring and maintaining the right motivation can be quite challenging. This is particularly true when dealing with LM programs, which typically demand several years to effectively transform people's mindset. Furthermore, the disparity in mindset between companies that have recently embraced lean thinking and those from which the so-called Toyota Way originated its founding principles adds to the complexity of this task. Based on a real case study conducted in an Italian manufacturing company, the aim of this paper is to understand how the implementation of a Lean program within a factory is actually perceived by blue and white-collar workers. Given the broad spectrum of personal preferences and inclinations that differentiate each individual, the analysis was built by establishing a correlation between learning styles of the participants and predisposition toward Lean methodologies, which has resulted in a wide variety of both positive and negative outcomes. Such results highlight the need for a different design of the training program to tailor it more effectively to the needs of each worker, thereby triggering a positive reaction that over time can maintain high motivation among the operators in the full embrace of Lean methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belekoukias, I., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Kumar, V.: The impact of lean methods and tools on the operational performance of manufacturing organisations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(18), 5346–5366 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mann, D.: The missing link: lean leadership. Front. Health Serv. Manag. 26(1), 15–26 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., Danese, P.: Successful lean implementation: organizational culture and soft lean practices. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 160, 182–201 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodríguez, D., Buyens, D., Van Landeghem, H., Lasio, V.: Impact of lean production on perceived job autonomy and job satisfaction: an experimental study. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 26(2), 159–176 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liker, J.K., Convis, G.L.: Toyota Way to Lean Leadership: Achieving and Sustaining Excellence Through Leadership Development. McGraw-Hill Education, New York City (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zanchi, M., Gaiardelli, P., Powell, D.J.: The impact of different training approaches on learning lean: a comparative study on value stream mapping. In: Powell, D.J., Alfnes, E., Holmemo, M.D.Q., Reke, E. (eds.) ELEC 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 610, pp. 109–117. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92934-3_12

  7. Dombrowski, U., MIelke, T.: Lean leadership–15 rules for a sustainable lean implementation. Procedia CIRP 17, 565–570 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutierrez, J., Rojas, L., Saldivar, D., Rios, V., Aliaga, A.: Benefits of the 5’s methodology in the manufacturing industry: a literature review 2017–2022. In: Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mascarenhas, R.F., Pimentel, C., Rosa, M.J.: The way lean starts–a different approach to introduce lean culture and changing process with people’s involvement. Procedia Manuf. 38, 948–956 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nahavandi, S.: Industry 5.0—a human-centric solution. Sustainability 11(16), 4371 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn, R., Griggs, S.: The Dunn and Dunn learning style model and its theoretical cornerstone. In: Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn Learning-Style Model Research Who, What, When, Where, and so What, pp. 1–6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gregorc, A.F.: Style as a symptom: a phenomenological perspective. Theory Pract. 23(1), 51–55 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Honey, P., Mumford, A.: The Learning Styles Helper’s Guide. Peter Honey Publications, Maidenhead (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. O’Connor, P.J., Jackson, C.J.: The factor structure and validity of the Learning Styles Profiler (LSP). Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 24(2), 117–123 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. FT Press/Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Myers, I.B., McCaulley, M.H., Quenk, N.L., Hammer, A.L.: MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Washington, DC (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fleming, N.D.: VARK Visual, Aural/Auditory, Read/Write, Kinesthetic. Bonwell Green Mountain Falls, Christchurch (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vermunt, J.D.: The regulation of constructive learning processes. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 68(2), 149–171 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dyer, W.G., Jr., Wilkins, A.L.: Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16(3), 613–619 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, vol. 5. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Siegel, R., Antony, J., Govindan, K., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Lameijer, B., Samadhiya, A.: A framework for the systematic implementation of green-lean and sustainability in SMEs. Prod. Plan. Control 35, 1–19 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J., Sundin, E., Poksinska, B.: Remanufacturing challenges and possible lean improvements. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 3225–3236 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Zanchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zanchi, M., Colombo, B., Gaiardelli, P. (2024). The Influence of Learning Styles on the Perception of Lean Implementation Effectiveness by Employees. In: van Kollenburg, T., Kokkinou, A., McDermott, O. (eds) Challenging the Future with Lean. ELEC 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 681. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63265-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63265-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-63264-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-63265-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics