Skip to main content

An Examination of the Limited Adoption of Personalized Work Instructions in Assembly to Accommodate Individual Worker’s Needs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Environments (APMS 2024)

Abstract

Creating a good fit between an individual’s information needs and the information provided in work instructions by personalizing its content and form facilitates allocating a more diverse group of operators to a particular assembly task, stimulating the labor force participation rate and inclusiveness. While ongoing technological development should make the personalization of work instructions easier, adoption in practice is still limited. Analyzing nine companies through a multiple case study approach, this paper investigates the challenges organizations face when creating, maintaining, and using personalized work instructions in practice. Overall, organizations struggle to adopt personalization due to its demanding nature, involving complex and time-consuming maintenance to keep personalized, and thus a large number of instructions, up-to-date. Personalization found in the cases mainly involves the use of a personal mentor to adapt the information detail to the characteristics of the worker, as well as allowing employees to conduct minor edits or to create their own instructions. Despite its possibilities, technology hardly played a role in creating and communicating personalized work instructions. To facilitate a more inclusive work design in practice, creating, implementing, and maintaining work instructions must become more accessible and manageable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papetti, A., Ciccarelli, M., Palpacelli, M.C., Germani, M.: How to provide work instructions to reduce the workers’ physical and mental workload. Procedia CIRP 120, 1167–1172 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Funk, M., Kosch, T., Schmidt, A.: Interactive worker assistance: comparing the effects of in-situ projection, head-mounted displays, tablet, and paper instructions. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 934–939. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frank, A.G., Dalenogare, L.S., Ayala, N.F.: Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 210, 15–26 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stöhr, M., Schneider, M., Henkel, C.: Adaptive work instructions for people with disabilities in the context of human robot collaboration. In: IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), pp. 301–308. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jost, M., Luxenburger, A., Knoch, S., Alexandersson, J.: PARTAS: a personalizable augmented reality based task adaption system for workers with cognitive disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 159–168. ACM (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haug, A.: Work instruction quality in industrial management. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 50, 170–177 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pimminger, S., Neumayr, T., Panholzer, L., Augstein, M., Kurschl, W.: Reflections on work instructions of assembly tasks. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peltokorpi, J., Hoedt, S., Colman, T., Rutten, K., Aghezzaf, E., Cottyn, J.: Manual assembly learning, disability, and instructions: an industrial experiment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61(22), 7903–7921 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanneste, P., et al.: Towards tailored cognitive support in augmented reality assembly work instructions. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 40(2), 797–811 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heinz-Jakobs, M., Große-Coosmann, A., Röcker, C.: Promoting inclusive work with digital assistance systems: experiences of cognitively disabled workers with in-situ assembly support. In: 2022 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), pp. 377–384. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mark, B.G., Hofmayer, S., Rauch, E., Matt, D.T.: Inclusion of workers with disabilities in production 4.0: legal foundations in europe and potentials through worker assistance systems. Sustainability 11(21), 5978 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Letmathe, P., Rößler, M.: Should firms use digital work instructions?—Individual learning in an agile manufacturing setting. J. Oper. Manag. 68(1), 94–109 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, D., Mattsson, S., Fast-Berglund, Å., Åkerman, M.: Testing operator support tools for a global production strategy. Procedia CIRP 44, 120–125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mark, B.G., Rauch, E., Matt, D.T.: Worker assistance systems in manufacturing: a review of the state of the art and future directions. J. Manuf. Syst. 59, 228–250 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Romero, D., Bernus, P., Noran, O., Stahre, J., Fast-Berglund, Å.: The operator 4.0: human cyber-physical systems & adaptive automation towards human-automation symbiosis work systems. In: Advances in Production Management Systems. Initiatives for a Sustainable World: IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference, pp. 677–686. Springer International Publishing, Iguassu Falls, Brazil (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geng, J., et al.: A systematic design method of adaptive augmented reality work instruction for complex industrial operations. Comput. Ind. 119, 103229 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, D., Mattsson, S., Salunkhe, O., Fast-Berglund, Å., Skoogh, A., Broberg, J.: Effects of information content in work instructions for operator performance. Procedia Manufacturing 25, 628–635 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchner, J., Buntins, K., Kerres, M.: A systematic map of research characteristics in studies on augmented reality and cognitive load. Compu. Edu. Open 2, 100036 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoover, M., Miller, J., Gilbert, S., Winer, E.: Measuring the performance impact of using the Microsoft HoloLens 1 to provide guided assembly work instructions. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 20(6), 061001 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolbeinsson, A., Fogelberg, E., Thorvald, P.: Information display preferences for assembly instructions in 6 industrial settings. In: 14th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) and the Affiliated Conferences, pp.152–161. AHFE International Open Access (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mattsson, S., Fast-Berglund, Å., Li, D.: Evaluation of guidelines for assembly instructions. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12), 209–214 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosch, T., Könemann, R., De Cock, H., Van Rhijn, G.: The effects of projected versus display instructions on productivity, quality and workload in a simulated assembly task. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 412–415 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schlund, S., Kostolani, D.: Towards Designing Adaptive and Personalized Work Systems in Manufacturing. Digitization of the work environment for sustainable production, 81–96 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mattsson, S., Fast-Berglund, Å. Li, D., Thorvald, P.: Forming a cognitive automation strategy for operator 4.0 in complex assembly. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, 105360 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Palmqvist, A., Vikingsson, E., Li, D., Fast-Berglund, Å., Lund, N.: Concepts for digitalisation of assembly instructions for short takt times. Procedia CIRP 97, 154–159 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Samy, S.N., ElMaraghy, H.: A model for measuring products assembly complexity. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 23(11), 1015–1027 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiedenmaier, S., Oehme, O., Schmidt, L., Luczak, H.: Augmented reality (AR) for assembly processes design and experimental evaluation. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interac. 16(3), 497–514 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Uva, A.E., Gattullo, M., Manghisi, V.M., Spagnulo, D., Cascella, G.L., Fiorentino, M.: Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial augmented reality in smart manufacturing: a solution for manual working stations. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94, 509–521 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Radkowski, R., Herrema, J., Oliver, J.: Augmented reality-based manual assembly support with visual features for different degrees of difficulty. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Int. 31(5), 337–349 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mattsson, S., Li, D., Fast-Berglund, Å.: Application of design principles for assembly instructions – evaluation of practitioner use. Procedia CIRP 76, 42–47 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Funk, M., Dingler, T., Cooper, J., Schmidt, A.: Stop helping me - I'm bored! Why assembly assistance needs to be adaptive. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 1269–1273. ACM Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mourtzis, D., Xanthi, F., Zogopoulos, V.: An Adaptive framework for augmented reality instructions considering workforce skill. Procedia CIRP 81, 363–368 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stockinger, C., Stuke, F., Subtil, I.: User-centered development of a worker guidance system for a flexible production line. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 31(5), 532–545 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolfartsberger, J., Heiml, M., Schwartz, G., Egger, S.: Multi-modal visualization of working instructions for assembly operations. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Aerosp. Sci. 13(2), 107–112 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Funk, M., Mayer, S., Schmidt, A.: Using in-situ projection to support cognitively impaired workers at the workplace. In: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, pp. 185–192. ACM Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vanneste, P., Huang, Y., Park, J.Y., Cornillie, F., Decloedt, B., Van den Noortgate, W.: Cognitive support for assembly operations by means of augmented reality: an exploratory study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 143, 102480 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 25–32 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Waschull, S., Bokhorst, J.A.C., Wortmann, J.C., Molleman, E.: The redesign of blue- and white-collar work triggered by digitalization: collar matters. Comput. Ind. Eng. 165, 107910 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cena, F., Console, L., Matassa, A., Torre, I.: Principles to design smart physical objects as adaptive recommenders. IEEE Access 5, 23532–23549 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Philips, G.R., Huang, M., Bodine, C.: Helping or Hindering: inclusive design of automated task prompting for workers with cognitive disabilities. ACM Trans. Accessible Comput. 16(4), 1–23 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper is embedded in the RAAK.MKB17.017 project on Flexible work instructions, led by the HAN University of Applied Sciences. The authors acknowledge the collaboration with HAN staff and all company representatives who participated in the case interviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Waschull .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bokhorst, J.A.C., Waschull, S., Emmanouilidis, C. (2024). An Examination of the Limited Adoption of Personalized Work Instructions in Assembly to Accommodate Individual Worker’s Needs. In: Thürer, M., Riedel, R., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Environments. APMS 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 729. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65894-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65894-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-65893-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-65894-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics