Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Postcolonial 4IR Environmental Scanning for IS Education: A Transformative Mixed-Methods Approach for Decolonization and Inclusivity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development (ICT4D 2024)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 708))

  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) heralds a significant turning point for Information Systems (IS) education in the global South, particularly in postcolonial nations such as South Africa. This study aims to introduce a preliminary transformative mixed-methods approach to environmental scanning for assessing and responding to the rapidly evolving postcolonial IS educational landscape in the 4IR era. Drawing from recent theoretical and methodological advances in IS and postcolonial research, this approach uniquely combines quantitative data analysis for broader trend identification with qualitative inquiries to capture in-depth perspectives from diverse educational stakeholders in postcolonial contexts. This transformative sociotechnical tool can better align IS curricula with rapid technological advancements and varied industry needs while critically addressing the social, political, cultural, ethnic, and economic development complexities inherent in postcolonial contexts. The paper proposes a complementary approach for employing an adapted environmental scanning approach that extends upon conventional mixed-methods approaches by explicitly addressing social injustice, inequality, and power issues in postcolonial regions. The paper also discusses the sociotechnical challenges of implementing this approach in diverse and resource-constrained educational environments, such as limited funding, access to technology, and a deficit of postcolonially-sensitive educators. This paper aims to contribute to advancing IS education and guiding administrators, educators, and policymakers in developing technologically current and socially inclusive curricula. This paper lays the groundwork for future empirical research and transformative IS education discourse and actions for postcolonial regions in the 4IR era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tutu, D.M.: Future without Forgiveness. Doubleday, New York (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Avis, J.: Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocational education and training: a literature review. J. Vocat. Educ. Training. 1–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2018.1498907

  3. Xu, M., David, J.M., Kim, S.H.: The fourth industrial revolution: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Financ. Res. 9, 90–95 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwab, K.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum, Cologny (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A.: Will humans go the way of horses? Foreign Aff. 94, 8–14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castells, M.: The Rise of the Network Society. Wiley-Blackwell (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carrim, N.: 4IR in South Africa and some of its educational implications. J. Educ. 1–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i86a01

  8. Tikly, L.: Globalisation and education in the postcolonial world: towards a conceptual framework. Comp. Educ. 37, 151–171 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060124481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chilisa, B., Major, T.E., Khudu-Petersen, K.: Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm. Qual. Res. 17, 326–339 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117696176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthee, M., Turpin, M.: Teaching critical thinking, problem solving, and design thinking: preparing is students for the future. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 30, 242–252 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pratt, J.A., Keys, A., Wirkus, T.: Preparing information systems graduates for a complex society: aligning is curricula with liberal education learning outcomes. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 25, 35–44 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maringe, F., Chiramba, O.: Equity, access and success in higher education in times of disruption: Contemporary and future imaginaries. S. Afr. J. High. Educ. 36, 1–5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maringe, F., Chiramba, O. eds: The 4IR and teacher education in South Africa: contemporary discourses and empirical evidence. AOSIS, Cape Town (2022). https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2022.BK306

  14. Bowie, A.: “Not Our Revolution”: a thematic review of fourth industrial revolution criticism. Communication 48, 1–19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2022.2142254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gandhi, L.: Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction. Columbia University Press, New York (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Krishna, S.: Race, amnesia, and the education of international relations. Alternatives 26, 401–424 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Said, E.W.: Orientalism. Vintage Books, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, H.J., Daugherty, P.R., Morini-Bianzino, N.: The jobs that artificial intelligence will create. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 58, 97–104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11645.003.0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Olaitan, O.O., Issah, M., Wayi, N.: A framework to test South Africa’s readiness for the fourth industrial revolution. SA J. Inf. Manag. 23, 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Choo, C.W.: Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning. Inf. Res. 7, 1–15 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tushman, M.L., Anderson, P.: Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm. Sci. Q. 31, 439–465 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hambrick, D.C.: Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 3, 159–174 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Auster, E., Choo, C.W.: How senior managers acquire and use information in environmental scanning. Inf. Process. Manage. 30, 607–618 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(94)90073-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahituv, N., Zif, J., Machlin, I.: Environmental scanning and information systems in relation to success in introducing new products. Inf. Manag. 33, 201–211 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00025-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Choudhury, V., Sampler, J.L.: Information specificity and environmental scanning: an economic perspective. MIS Q. 21, 25–53 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/249741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maier, J.L., Rainer, R.K., Snyder, C.A.: Environmental scanning for information technology: an empirical investigation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 14, 177–200 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1997.11518170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kodama, F.: Learning mode and strategic concept for the 4th industrial revolution. J. Open Innovation: Technol. Market Complex. 4, 32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4030032

  28. Topi, H., et al.: Global Competency Model for Graduate Degree Programs in Information Systems

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shah, V., Kumar, A., Smart, K.: Moving forward by looking backward: embracing pedagogical principles to develop an innovative msis program. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 29, 139–156 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bayode, A., van der Poll, J.A., Ramphal, R.R.: 4th Industrial Revolution: Challenges and Opportunities in the South African Context. Presented at the Int’l Conference on Science, Engineering, Technology & Waste Management, Johannesburg (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chilisa, B., Tsheko, G.N.: Mixed methods in indigenous research: building relationships for sustainable intervention outcomes. J. Mixed Methods Res. 8, 222–233 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mertens, D.M.: Transformative mixed methods: addressing inequities. Am. Behav. Sci. 56, 802–813 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., Sullivan, Y.: Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: an extension and illustration. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 435–494 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prasad, A.: Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis: A Critical Engagement. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., Joseph, G.O.: Critical discourse analysis in education: a review of the literature. Rev. Educ. Res. 75, 365–416 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rogers, R. ed: An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ravishankar, M.N., Pan, S.L., Myers, M.D.: Information technology offshoring in India: a postcolonial perspective. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 387–402 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Young, M.-L., Kuo, F.-Y., Myers, M.D.: To share or not to share: a critical research perspective on knowledge management systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21, 496–511 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Taket, A., Crisp, B.R., Nevill, A., Lamaro, G., Barter-Godfrey, S.: Theorising Social Exclusion. Routledge, London (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Mertens, D.M.: Transformative paradigm: mixed methods and social justice. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1, 212–225 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mertens, D.M.: Transformative mixed methods research. Qual. Inq. 16, 469–474 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H.: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 37, 21–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Creswell, J.W., Plano, V.L.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Woolman, D.C.: Educational reconstruction and post-colonial curriculum development: a comparative study of four African countries. Int. Electron. J. 2, 27–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., Elbanna, A.: The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MISQ 43, 695–719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Margherita, E.G., Braccini, A.M.: Examining the development of a digital ecosystem in an Industry 4.0 context: a sociotechnical perspective. SN Bus Econ. 1, 1–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00096-z

  47. Tsibolane, P., Brown, I.: Principles for conducting critical research using postcolonial theory in ICT4D studies. In: Proceedings Annual Workshop of the AIS Special Interest Group for ICT in Global Development, pp. 1–28. , Dublin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  48. French, A., Shim, J.P., Risius, M., R. Larsen, K., Jain, H.: The 4th industrial revolution powered by the integration of AI, blockchain, and 5G. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 49, 266–286 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04910

  49. Held, M.B.E.: Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: an unsettling, mutual, and collaborative effort. Int J Qual Methods 18, 1–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918821574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Avgerou, C.: Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review. J. Inf. Technol. 23, 133–146 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gyamera, G.O., Burke, P.J.: Neoliberalism and curriculum in higher education: a post-colonial analyses. Teach. High. Educ. 23, 450–467 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Castro, F.G., Kellison, J.G., Boyd, S.J., Kopak, A.: A methodology for conducting integrative mixed methods research and data analyses. J. Mixed Methods Res. 4, 342–360 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang, W.: Why IS: understanding undergraduate students’ intentions to choose an information systems major. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 18, 447–458 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Joshi, K.D., Kuhn, K.: What determines interest in an is career? An application of the theory of reasoned action. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 29, 133–158 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen, L., Pratt, J.A., Cole, C.B.: Factors influencing students’ major and career selection in systems development: an empirical study. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 56, 313–320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1164005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Krishna, S.: Globalization and postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Myers, K.: A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Q. 35, 17–36 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/23043487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ngwenyama, O.K.: The critical social theory approach to information systems: problems and challenges. In: Qualitative Research in Information Systems, pp. 114–126. SAGE Publications, Ltd, London (2002). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209687.n7

  59. Graeber, D.: It is value that brings universes into being. HAU: J. Ethnographic Theor. 3, 219–243 (2013). https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, School of Business Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein, 2000, South Africa

    Rennie Naidoo

Authors
  1. Rennie Naidoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rennie Naidoo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    Wallace Chigona

  2. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    Salah Kabanda

  3. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    Lisa F. Seymour

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

The author has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Naidoo, R. (2024). Postcolonial 4IR Environmental Scanning for IS Education: A Transformative Mixed-Methods Approach for Decolonization and Inclusivity. In: Chigona, W., Kabanda, S., Seymour, L.F. (eds) Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development. ICT4D 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 708. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66982-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66982-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-66981-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-66982-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships