Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Involving Heterogeneous User Groups in Developing Innovations on Digital Platforms in Healthcare

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development (ICT4D 2024)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 708))

  • 329 Accesses

Abstract

This study investigates how diverse users can be involved in developing innovations on existing digital platforms. While user participation is emphasized in the design and development of digital platforms, little is known about how heterogeneous user groups can be involved in the design and development of large-scale information systems. The current knowledge base is confined to the context of small-scale information systems with homogenous groups of users. We conducted a qualitative case study where we studied the process of developing innovations on a health digital platform in Tanzania between 2017 and 2019. We investigated three innovations; the mobile application for data management, a case-based TB and leprosy system, and the development of a scorecard system. We found that heterogeneous user groups in digital platforms exist in a continuum of roles, including end-users, use mediators, facilitators, technology mediators, and platform owners, without strict boundaries. Further, we identified three methods of engaging users in these roles depending on the nature of the requirements: participation for policy-level needs, participation for organisational requirements, and participation for technical requirements. We recommend that information systems development adopts this classification of users and their methods of participation from as early as project conceptualisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

References

  1. Saleem, N., Steel, D., Gercek, G., Chandra, A.: Significance of user participation in a hospital information system success: Insights from a case study. Health Care Manag. (Frederick) 36(2), 199–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barki, H., Hartwick, J.: Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Q. 13(1), 53–63 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martikainen, S., Kaipio, J., Lääveri, T.: End-user participation in health information systems (HIS) development: physicians’ and nurses’ experiences. Int. J. Med. Inf. 137, 14117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B.: Participatory design in community informatics. Des. Stud. 28(3), 243–261 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., Iversen, O.S.: In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 74, 93–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T.: User participation and democracy: a discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 73–98 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kensing, F., Simonsen, J., Bødker, K.: MUST: a method for participatory design. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 13(2), 167–198 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1302_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellingsen, G., Hertzum, M.: User participation in the implementation of large-scale suite systems in healthcare (2019). https://doi.org/10.18420/ihc2019

  9. Roland, L.K., Sanner, T.A., Sæbø, J.I., Monteiro, E.: P for platform: architectures of large-scale participatory design P for Platform. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 29(2), 3–34 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johannessen, L.K., Gammon, D., Ellingsen, G.: Users as designers of information infrastructures and the role of generativity. AIS Trans. Hum.-Computer Interact. 4(2), 72–91 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, J., Nie, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, K., Tong, S., Eynard, B.: A framework method of user-participation configuration design for complex products. Procedia CIRP 70, 451–456 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iivari, J., Isomäki, H., Pekkola, S.: The user - the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Inf. Syst. J. 20(2), 109–117 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00336.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Millerand, F., Baker, K.S.: Who are the users? who are the developers? webs of users and developers in the development process of a technical standard. Inf. Syst. J. 20(2), 137–161 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00338.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, B., Peine, A., Östlund, B., Heyn, P.C.: The importance of user involvement: a systematic review of involving older users in technology design. Gerontologist 60(7), E513–E523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hornby, A.S.: Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., Van De Ven, A.H.: Perspectives on innovation processes. Acad. Manag. Ann. 7(1), 775–819 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.791066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adu-Gyamfi, E., Nielsen, P., Sæbø, J.I.: The dynamics of a global health information systems research and implementation project. In: SHI 2019. Proceedings of 17th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics, Oslo, Norway, 12–13 November 2019, no. 161, pp. 73–79 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Byrne, E., Sæbø, J.I.: Routine use of DHIS2 data : a scoping review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 1–16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08598-8

  19. Barcellini, F., Prost, L., Cerf, M.: Designers’ and users’ roles in participatory design: what is actually co-designed by participants? Appl. Ergon. 50, 31–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Näkki, P., Koskela-Huotari, K.: User participation in software design via social media: experiences from a case study with consumers. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4(2), 129–152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sopjani, L., Stier, J.J., Ritzén, S., Hesselgren, M., Georén, P.: Involving users and user roles in the transition to sustainable mobility systems: the case of light electric vehicle sharing in Sweden. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 71, 207–221 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Holgersson, J., Melin, U., Lindgren, I., Axelsson, K.: Exploring user participation practice in public E-service development : why, how and in whose interest? Electron. J. e-Gov. 16(1), 72–86 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2. SAGE, Thousands Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baxter, P., Jack, S.: Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers (2008). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434600802010058

  25. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clarke, V., Braun, V.: Teaching thematic analysis: overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. Psychologist 26(2), 120–123 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maguire, M., Delahunt, B.: Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Irel J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 3, 3135–3140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2014.2306979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grisot, M., Hanseth, O., Thorseng, A.A.: Innovation of, in, on infrastructures: articulating the role of architecture in information infrastructure evolution. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 197–219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200710779521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanseth, O., Bygstad, B.: Flexible generification: ICT standardization strategies and service innovation in health care. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 645–663 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nielsen, P., Sæbø, J.I.: Three strategies for functional architecting : cases from the health systems of developing countries. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22(1), 134–151 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1026304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. WHO. The End TB Strategy, Geneva (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. WHO. Electronic recording and reporting for tuberculosis care and control, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1–76 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. NTLP. National strategic plan V for Tuberculosis and Leprosy program 2015–2020. National TB and Leprosy Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, pp. 1–50 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Storvang, P., Haug, A., Nguyen, B.: A typology of strategies for user involvement in innovation processes. Prometheus 36(4), 347–365 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zobel, B., Werder, K., Berkemeier, L., Thomas, O.: The role of early user participation in discovering software – a case study from the context of smart glasses. In: 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 1235–1349 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Endter, C.: User participation as a matter of care the configuration of older users in the design of assistive technologies. Tecnoscienza-Italian J. Sci. Technol. Stud. 11(2), 93–116 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Masoud Mahundi & Honest Kimaro

  2. University of Oslo, Ole-Johan Dahls Hus, Gaustadalleen 23B, 0373, Oslo, Norway

    Petter Nielsen

Authors
  1. Masoud Mahundi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Honest Kimaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Petter Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Mahundi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    Wallace Chigona

  2. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    Salah Kabanda

  3. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    Lisa F. Seymour

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mahundi, M., Kimaro, H., Nielsen, P. (2024). Involving Heterogeneous User Groups in Developing Innovations on Digital Platforms in Healthcare. In: Chigona, W., Kabanda, S., Seymour, L.F. (eds) Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development. ICT4D 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 708. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66982-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66982-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-66981-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-66982-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships