Skip to main content

Dempster-Shafer Credal Probabilistic Circuits

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Belief Functions: Theory and Applications (BELIEF 2024)

Abstract

Probabilistic circuits are deep, tractable generative models capable of computing various types of exact inferences. However, their traditional specifications do not fully account for epistemic uncertainty. To address this, credal probabilistic circuits were introduced, incorporating a way to manage such uncertainty. We propose a novel framework for learning the structure and parameters of credal probabilistic circuits, leveraging the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Unlike previous credal approaches, the framework handles both discrete and continuous data and allows for the use of multiple classification criteria. We conclude by presenting some preliminary experimental results, demonstrating the performance of the proposed models compared to commonly used probabilistic circuits across a range of classification tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The leaf distributions parameterised by \(\varTheta \) may also be relaxed to imprecise models in an analogous manner, but for simplicity we will not consider this here.

  2. 2.

    Essentially, that \(\mathcal {C}\) is ‘separately specified’ using ‘local models’ for each sum node, and that each local model is sufficiently nice, i.e. non-empty, closed, and convex.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/UCLA-StarAI/Density-Estimation-Datasets.

  4. 4.

    It is worth noting that the criteria from Sect. 3.1 also applies to the general case of multi-class classification.

  5. 5.

    Iterative Row-wise Quadratic Programming Evidential Clustering.

References

  1. Dempster, A.P.: A generalization of Bayesian inference. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 30(2), 205–247 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Denœux, T., Sriboonchitta, S., Kanjanatarakul, O.: Evidential clustering of large dissimilarity data. Knowl.-Based Syst. 106, 179–195 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gens, R., Domingos, P.: Learning the structure of sum-product networks. In: Dasgupta, S., McAllester, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 28, pp. 873–880. PMLR, Atlanta (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levray, A., Belle, V.: Learning credal sum product networks. In: Automated Knowledge Base Construction (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Masson, M.H., Denœux, T.: ECM: an evidential version of the fuzzy C-means algorithm. Pattern Recogn. 41(4), 1384–1397 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mauá, D.D., Conaty, D., Cozman, F.G., Poppenhaeger, K., De Campos, C.P.: Robustifying sum-product networks. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 101, 163–180 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Montalván Hernández, D.R., Centen, T., Krak, T., Quaeghebeur, E., de Campos, C.: Beyond tree-shaped credal probabilistic circuits. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 109047 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poon, H., Domingos, P.: Sum-product networks: a new deep architecture. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), pp. 689–690 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Smets, P.: Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 38(2), 133–147 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Troffaes, M.C.: Decision making under uncertainty using imprecise probabilities. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 45(1), 17–29 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the support from the Eindhoven Artificial Intelligence Systems Institute and the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science of TU Eindhoven. The authors thank Erik Quaeghebeur for their valuable insights and discussions on credal PCs. Cassio de Campos thanks the support of EU European Defence Fund Project KOIOS (EDF-2021-DIGIT-R-FL-KOIOS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ricardo Montalván Hernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Montalván Hernández, D.R., Krak, T., de Campos, C. (2024). Dempster-Shafer Credal Probabilistic Circuits. In: Bi, Y., Jousselme, AL., Denoeux, T. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. BELIEF 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14909. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67977-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67977-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-67976-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-67977-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics