Skip to main content

Identifying Difficult Environmental Conditions with Scenario-Based Hazard and Fault Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2024 Workshops (SAFECOMP 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14989))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 703 Accesses

Abstract

Automated driving systems (ADS) are envisioned to operate in a complex open world. To ensure that difficult environmental conditions do not trigger inadequate system behavior, it is crucial to identify difficult conditions and test whether they expose specific functional insufficiencies. The standard ISO 21448 introduces the concept of Triggering Conditions but does not provide designated methods for finding such conditions. Thus, we present an analytical method to systematically identify triggering conditions. The method supports domain experts to comprehensively model given driving scenarios and exhaustively deduce potential hazardous behaviors of the ADS. We show the method’s applicability by conducting a workshop series with 16 domain experts. There, 122 triggering conditions covering the sense-plan-act chain of ADS are elicited, based on which eight clusters are further identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Full catalog of triggering conditions: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11472687.

References

  1. Adee, A., Gansch, R., Liggesmeyer, P., Glaeser, C., Drews, F.: Discovery of perception performance limiting triggering conditions in automated driving. In: 5th International Conference on System Reliablity and Safety (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Althoff, M., Koschi, M., Manzinger, S.: CommonRoad: composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amersbach, C.T.: Functional decomposition approach-reducing the safety validation effort for highly automated driving. Ph.D. thesis, TU Darmstadt (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breitenstein, J., Termohlen, J.A., Lipinski, D., Fingscheidt, T.: Systematization of corner cases for visual perception in automated driving. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crawley, F., Tyler, B.: HAZOP: Guide to Best Practice. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hartjen, L.: Semantic Classification of Urban Traffic Scenarios for the Validation of Automated Driving Systems. Ph.D. thesis, TU Braunschweig (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  7. IEC 60812:2018: Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA and FMECA). Standard, TC 56 - Dependability, Geneva, Switzerland (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IEC 61025:2006: Fault tree analysis (FTA). Standard, TC 56 - Dependability, Geneva, Switzerland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO 21448:2022: Road vehicles - Safety of the intended functionality. Standard, Geneva, Switzerland (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khatun, M., Glaß, M., Jung, R.: Scenario-based extended hara incorporating functional safety & sotif for autonomous driving. In: ESREL - 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kramer, B., Neurohr, C., Büker, M., Böde, E., Fränzle, M., Damm, W.: Identification and quantification of hazardous scenarios for automated driving. In: Zeller, M., Höfig, K. (eds.) IMBSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12297, pp. 163–178. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58920-2_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Leveson, N., Thomas, J.: STPA handbook (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linnhoff, C., Rosenberger, P., Schmidt, S., Elster, L., Stark, R., Winner, H.: Towards serious perception sensor simulation for safety validation of automated driving - a collaborative method to specify sensor models. In: IEEE Transportation on Intelligent Transport System (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, H., Winkler, B., Grubmüller, S., Watzenig, D.: Identification of performance limitations of sensing technologies for automated driving. In: IEEE International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, L., Wang, H., Li, J.: Uncertainty evaluation of object detection algorithms for autonomous vehicles. Autom. Innov. 4, 241–252 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Philipp, R., et al.: Systematization of relevant road users for the evaluation of autonomous vehicle perception. In: IEEE International System Conference (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ren, L., Yin, H., Ge, W., Meng, Q.: Environment influences on uncertainty of object detection for automated driving systems. In: International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scholtes, M., et al.: 6-layer model for a structured description and categorization of urban traffic and environment. IEEE Access 9, 59131–59147 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma, O., Sahoo, N., Puhan, N.: Recent advances in motion and behavior planning techniques for software architecture of autonomous vehicles: a state-of-the-art survey. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 101, 104211 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tong, J., Xing, X., Guo, R., Jiang, W., Xiong, L., Chen, J.: Performance limitations analysis of visual sensors in low light conditions based on field test. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. UL 4600: Standard for evaluation of autonomous products, 1 edn. Standard, UL (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ulbrich, S., Menzel, T., Reschka, A., Schuldt, F., Maurer, M.: Defining and substantiating the terms scene, situation, and scenario for automated driving. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation System (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xing, X., Jia, T., Chen, J., Xiong, L., Yu, Z.: An ontology-based method to identify triggering conditions for perception insufficiency of autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08724 (2022)

  24. Zhang, X., et al.: Finding critical scenarios for automated driving systems: a systematic mapping study. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 49, 991–1026 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu, Z., Philipp, R., Hungar, C., Howar, F.: Systematization and identification of triggering conditions: a preliminary step for efficient testing of autonomous vehicles. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhijing Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhu, Z., Philipp, R., Hungar, C., Howar, F. (2024). Identifying Difficult Environmental Conditions with Scenario-Based Hazard and Fault Analysis. In: Ceccarelli, A., Trapp, M., Bondavalli, A., Schoitsch, E., Gallina, B., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2024 Workshops. SAFECOMP 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14989. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68738-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68738-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-68737-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-68738-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics