Skip to main content

Collateral Portfolio Optimization in Crypto-Backed Stablecoins

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy (MARBLE 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Operations Research ((LNOR))

  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

Stablecoins—crypto tokens whose value is pegged to a real-world asset such as the US Dollar—are an important component of the DeFi ecosystem as they mitigate the impact of token price volatility. In crypto-backed stablecoins, the peg is founded on the guarantee that in case of system shutdown, each stablecoin can be exchanged for a basket of other crypto tokens worth approximately its nominal value. However, price fluctuations that affect the collateral tokens may cause this guarantee to be invalidated. In this work, we investigate the impact of the collateral portfolio’s composition on the resilience to this type of catastrophic event. For stablecoins whose developers maintain a significant portion of the collateral (e.g., MakerDAO’s Dai), we propose two portfolio optimization methods, based on convex optimization and (semi)variance minimization, that account for the correlation between the various token prices. We compare the optimal portfolios to the historical evolution of Dai’s collateral portfolio, and to aid reproducibility, we have made our data and code publicly available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://coinmarketcap.com/.

  2. 2.

    Although we are unaware of examples of crypto-backed stablecoins that have collapsed entirely due to price fluctuations, there have been instances in which they may have come close (e.g., Dai’s ‘Black Thursday’ event in March 2020 [22]).

  3. 3.

    https://uniswap.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://maker.blockanalitica.com/simulations/risk-model/.

  5. 5.

    The semivariance of a random variable X is defined as \(\mathbb {E}[(X - \mathbb {E}[X])^2 {\textbf {1}}(X \le \mathbb {E}[X])]\) where \({\textbf {1}}\) is the standard indicator function.

  6. 6.

    https://maker.blockanalitica.com/vault-types/.

  7. 7.

    This is consistent, with, e.g., the Maker Risk Dashboard and [10].

  8. 8.

    For example, the 6 s Capital asset (RWA001) was increased from an initial $1,060 on 9 March 2021 to nearly $ 1.6 million on 27 August 2021 through a “price” update.

  9. 9.

    This is an argument in favor of a greater diversity of wrapped tokens on the Ethereum blockchain, or integrated cross-chain support as in [29].

References

  1. Active MakerDAO Adresses. https://chainlog.makerdao.com/api/mainnet/active.json.

  2. Ante, L., Fiedler, I., Willruth, J. M., & Steinmetz, F. (2023). A systematic literature review of empirical research on stablecoins. FinTech, 2(1), 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avan-Nomayo, O. 2023. MakerDAO’s \$4bn push into real world assets also means a real-world tax bill. https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/makerdao-pays-over-a-million-in-stamp-duty-tax-to-switzerland/.

  4. Bhat, S., Kahya, A., Kumar, R., & Krishnamachari, B. (2021). Simulating the MakerDAO stablecoin. In IEEE ICBC (pp. 1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binance Historical Market Data. https://www.binance.com/en/landing/data.

  6. Bluhm, M., Vasiljević, A. C., Derivaux, S., & Jessen, S. T. H. (2024). Real-time risk metrics for programmatic stablecoin crypto asset-liability management (CALM). arXiv:2401.13399.

  7. Briola, A., Vidal-Tomáss, D., Wang, Y., & Aste, T. (2023). Anatomy of a stablecoin’s failure: The Terra-Luna case. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103358.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cao, Y., Dai, M., Kou, S., Li, L., & Yang, C. (2022). Designing stable coins. Available at SSRN 3856569.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chaleenutthawut, Y., Davydov, V., Evdokimov, M., Kasemsuk, S., Kruglik, S., Melnikov, G., & Yanovich, Y. (2024). Loan portfolio dataset from MakerDAO blockchain project. IEEE Access.

    Google Scholar 

  11. cLabs Team. (2019). The Celo protocol: A multi-asset cryptographic protocol for decentralized social payments.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dai Stats. https://daistats.com/.

  13. DAI/ETH Uniswap LP Token Oracle Contract. https://etherscan.io/address/0xFc8137E1a45BAF0030563EC4F0F851bd36a85b7D.

  14. Gilbert, A. (2023). Everything is about to change at MakerDAO: Rune Christensen on his Endgame plan. https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/maker-endgame-reorganizes-defi-protocol-with-big-changes/.

  15. Google BigQuery. https://cloud.google.com/bigquery.

  16. Haig, S. (2023). MakerDAO now earns 80% of its fee revenue from real-world assets. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/makerdao-now-earns-80-fee-193402563.html.

  17. Harz, D., Gudgeon, L., Gervais, A., & Knottenbelt, W. J. (2019). Balance: Dynamic adjustment of cryptocurrency deposits. In ACM CCS (pp. 1485–1502).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jalan, A., & Matkovskyy, R. (2023). Systemic risks in the cryptocurrency market: Evidence from the FTX collapse. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103670.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang, E., Qin, B., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Weng, J., Li, X., Wang, C., Ding, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Decentralized finance (DeFi): A survey. arXiv:2308.05282.

  20. Kazemian, S., Huan, J., Shomroni, J., & Iyer, K. (2022). Frax: A fractional-algorithmic stablecoin protocol. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) (pp. 406–411). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kirillov, A., & Chung, S. (2022). StableSims: Optimizing MakerDAO liquidations 2.0 incentives via agent-based modeling. arXiv:2201.03519.

  22. Kjäer, M., Di Angelo, M., & Salzer, G. (2021). Empirical evaluation of MakerDAO’s resilience. In BRAINS (pp. 193–200).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klages-Mundt, A., Harz, D., Gudgeon, L., Liu, J. Y., & Minca, A. (2020). Stablecoins 2.0: Economic foundations and risk-based models. In ACM AFT (pp. 59–79).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maker Team. (2017). The Dai stablecoin system: Whitepaper. https://makerdao.com/whitepaper/DaiDec17WP.pdf.

  25. Markowitz, H. M., Starer, D., Fram, H., & Gerber, S. Avoiding the Downside: A Practical Review of the Critical Line Algorithm for Mean-Semivariance Portfolio Optimization (Chap. 16, pp. 369–415).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moin, A., Sekniqi, K., & Sirer, E. G. (2020). SoK: A classification framework for stablecoin designs. In Financial Crypto (pp. 174–197). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osolnik, J. (2023). Maker capital at risk: Model methodology. https://medium.com/block-analitica/maker-capital-at-risk-model-methodology-2423b0c5913c.

  29. Reijsbergen, D., Hajek, B., Dinh, T. T. A., Keppo, J., Korth, H., & Datta, A. (2023). CroCoDai: A stablecoin for cross-chain commerce. arXiv:2306.09754.

  30. Salehi, M., Clark, J., & Mannan, M. (2021). Red-black coins: Dai without liquidations. Financial Crypto: In DeFi Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sharpe, William F. (1994). The Sharpe ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Werner, S., Perez, D., Gudgeon, L., Klages-Mundt, A., Harz, D., & Knottenbelt, W. (2022). SoK: Decentralized finance (DeFi). In ACM AFT (pp. 30–46).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jiahua, Xu., Paruch, Krzysztof, Cousaert, Simon, & Feng, Yebo. (2023). SoK: Decentralized exchanges (DEX) with automated market maker (AMM) protocols. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(11), 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zamyatin, A., Harz, D., Lind, J., Panayiotou, P., Gervais, A., & Knottenbelt, W. (2019). Xclaim: Trustless, interoperable, cryptocurrency-backed assets. In IEEE S &P (pp. 193–210).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Ministry of Education (MOE) Singapore’s Tier 2 Grant Award No. MOE-T2EP20120-0003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bretislav Hajek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hajek, B., Reijsbergen, D., Datta, A., Keppo, J. (2024). Collateral Portfolio Optimization in Crypto-Backed Stablecoins. In: Leonardos, S., Alfieri, E., Knottenbelt, W.J., Pardalos, P. (eds) Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy. MARBLE 2024. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68974-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics