Abstract
This demo will present the Research Assistant (RA) tool developed to assist with six main types of research tasks defined as standardized instruction templates, instantiated with user input, applied finally as prompts to well-known—for their sophisticated natural language processing abilities—AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Gemini. The six research tasks addressed by RA are: creating FAIR research comparisons, ideating research topics, drafting grant applications, writing scientific blogs, aiding preliminary peer reviews, and formulating enhanced literature search queries. RA’s reliance on generative AI tools like ChatGPT or Gemini means the same research task assistance can be offered in any scientific discipline. We demonstrate its versatility by sharing RA outputs in Computer Science, Virology, and Climate Science, where the output with the RA tool assistance mirrored that from a domain expert who performed the same research task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Auer, S., et al.: Improving access to scientific literature with knowledge graphs. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 44(3), 516–529 (2020)
Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., Mutz, R.: Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8(1), 1–15 (2021)
Ermakova, L., et al.: Text simplification for scientific information access: CLEF 2021 SimpleText workshop. In: ECIR 2021, Virtual Event, March 28–April 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 43, pp. 583–592. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85251-1_27
Owens, B.: How nature readers are using ChatGPT. Nature 615, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00500-8
Shah, N.B.: Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review. Commun. ACM 65(6), 76–87 (2022)
de la Torre-López, J., Ramírez, A., Romero, J.R.: Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature. Computing 105(10), 2171–2194 (2023)
Van Altena, A., Spijker, R., Olabarriaga, S.: Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews. Res. Syn. Methods 10(1), 72–82 (2019)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the German BMBF project SCINEXT (ID 01lS22070).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shamsabadi, M., D’Souza, J. (2024). A FAIR and Free Prompt-Based Research Assistant. In: Rapp, A., Di Caro, L., Meziane, F., Sugumaran, V. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14763. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70242-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70242-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-70241-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-70242-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)