Skip to main content

GCC Aware Glaucoma Detection Using Macula OCT Image Analysis Based on Deep CNN

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14811))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 224 Accesses

Abstract

Glaucoma is a major public health challenge as it is the second leading cause of blindness next to cataract. Since vision loss caused by glaucoma is unrecoverable, an early, reliable diagnosis is desirable. Although complete eye examination is recommended for assessment of both structural and functional states of the disease, glaucomatous structural changes precede functional changes. Recently, classifying glaucomatous images taken from different modalities based on Deep Learning (DL) is increasingly being studied. Most of the researchers, however, focused on images generated from fundus camera and others on OCT scans taken from the optic nerve head (ONH). While others focused on specific information derived from the OCT machine itself including thickness and deviation maps of macular and ONH scans, and en-face images. However, the glaucomatous eye can be more effectively detected by analyzing the degeneration of the ganglion cell complex (GCC) by using original OCT complete scans as input. The current study used deep segmentation models to extract the GCC region which is composed of the retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cells with the inner plexiform layer. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based classifiers were used for detecting glaucomatous pathologies by paying attention to the GCC region of the macula Spectral Domain OCT (SD-OCT) scans. Model training and validation was carried out on a dataset composed of 1,262 locally acquired macula SD-OCT B-scans (432 non-glaucomatous and 830 glaucomatous) from four different regions of the macula: superior outside, inferior outside, inferior inside and central macula regions. Transfer learning was employed for segmentation as well as classifying the dataset. Three deep segmentation models, namely SegNet, PSPNet, and RAG-Net\(_{v2}\) were employed for segmentation and five CNN models, namely VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, EfficientNetV1 and InceptionV3 were used for classification purpose. SegNet showed the best performance for retina layer segmentation with 97.89% accuracy, 87.0% recall, 87.5% F1-score, 88.0% precision, 89.0% mean dice coefficient, and 81.0% mean_IOU. In terms of classification of glaucomatous and normal images, the maximum accuracy of 94.3% was obtained using VGG16 computed on the superior outside macula region, with 93.3% precision, 91.7% recall, 91.8% F1-score and 91.7% AUC. The study demonstrated that using GCC aware DL model based on macular B-scans shows great promise in the accurate screening of glaucoma and suggests that incorporating DL into macula SD-OCT for glaucoma assessment has the potential to fill some gaps in current practices and clinical workflow. To the best of our knowledge, such a DL scheme that considers the effect of the different GCC regions for the purpose of glaucoma screening hasn’t been reported in the literature before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tanna, A.P., Lin, S.C., Boland, M.V., et al.: 2021–2022 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 10: Glaucoma, Amercian Acadademy of Ophthalmology, pp. 53–57 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yadav, K.S., Rajpurohit, R., Sharma, S.: Glaucoma: current treatment and impact of advanced drug delivery systems. Life Sci. 221(February), 362–376 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tham, Y.C., Li, X., Wong, T.Y., Quigley, H.A., Aung, T., Cheng, C.Y.: Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121(11), 2081–2090 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

  4. Kyei, S., Aberor, J., Assiamah, F., Kwarteng, M.A.: Optical coherence tomography indices in the diagnosis and discrimination of stages of primary open-angle glaucoma in an African population. Int. Ophthalmol. 41(3), 981–990 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01652-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tegegn, M.T., Assaye, A.K., Mersha, G.A.: Proportion, causes and associated factors of blindness among adult patients attending tertiary eye care and training center in Ethiopia. Clin. Optom. 13, 83–91 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S295626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuster, A.K., Erb, C., Hoffmann, E.M., Dietlein, T., Pfeiffer, N.: The diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 117(13), 225–234 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, Y., et al.: Measures of disease activity in glaucoma. Biosens. Bioelectron. 196, 113700 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalil, T., Akram, M.U., Khalid, S., Jameel, A.: Improved automated detection of glaucoma from fundus image using hybrid structural and textural features. IET Image Process. 11(9), 693–700 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamalipour, A., Moghimi, S.: Macular optical coherence tomography imaging in glaucoma. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 16(3), 478–489 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, J., Fang, H., Li, F., et al.: GAMMA challenge: glaucoma grading from multi-modality imAges. Med. Image Anal. 90, 102938 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ceschini, L.M., Policarpo, L.M., Righi, R.R., Ramos, G.O.: Aiding glaucoma diagnosis from the automated classification and segmentation of fundus images. In: Xavier-Junior, J.C., Rios, R.A. (eds.) Intelligent Systems: 11th Brazilian Conference, BRACIS 2022, Campinas, Brazil, November 28 – December 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part II, pp. 343–356. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21689-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Raja, H., Akram, M.U., Hassan, T., Ramzan, A., Aziz, A., Raja, H.: Glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography images: a systematic review of clinical and automated studies. IETE J. Res. 69(11), 7958–7978 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2022.2043783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Medeiros, F.A., Zangwill, L.M., Bowd, C., Vessani, R.M., Susanna, R., Weinreb, R.N.: Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 139(1), 44–55 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toth, M.D., Kiss, A.: Retinal blood vessel segmentation on style-augmented images, Studia UNIV. BABES-BOLYAI, INFORMATICA, vol. LX VI, no. 1, (2021). https://doi.org/10.24193/subbi.2021.1.05.

  15. Zheng, C., Johnson, T.V., Garg, A., Boland, M.V.: Artificial intelligence in glaucoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 30(2), 97–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prabhakar, B., Singh, R.K., Yadav, K.S.: Artificial intelligence (AI) impacting diagnosis of glaucoma and understanding the regulatory aspects of AI-based software as medical device. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 87, 101818 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, J.J., Kardon, R.H.: Avoiding clinical misinterpretation and artifacts of optical coherence tomography analysis of the optic nerve, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layere. J. Neuroophthalmol. 36(4), 417–438 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mangione, C.M., Barry, M.J., Nicholson, W.K., et al.: Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA Netw., vol. 327(20), pp. 1992–1997 (2022). https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2792609

  19. Hood, D.C., Raza, A.S., de Moraes, C.G.V., Liebmann, J.M., Ritch, R.: Glaucomatous damage of the macula. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 32, 1–21 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shehryar, T., Akram, M.U., Khalid, S., et al.: Improved automated detection of glaucoma by correlating fundus and SD-OCT image analysis. Int. J. Imag. Syst. Technol. 30(4), 1046–1065 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, X., Xu, Y., Wong, D.W.K., Wong, T.Y., Liu, J.: Glaucoma detection based on deep convolutional neural network. In: Proceeding 2015 37th Annual International Conference IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., pp. 715–718, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318462.

  22. Lee, J., Kim, Y.K., Park, K.H., Jeoung, J.W.: Diagnosing glaucoma with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography using deep learning classifier. J. Glaucoma 29(4), 287–294 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, K.E., Kim, J.M., Song, J.E., Kee, C., Han, J.C., Hyun, S.H.: Development and validation of a deep learning system for diagnosing glaucoma using optical coherence tomography. J. Clin. Med. 9(7), 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maetschke, S., Antony, B., Ishikawa, H., Wollstein, G., Schuman, J., Garnavi, R.: A feature agnostic approach for glaucoma detection in OCT volumes. PLoS ONE 14(7), 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, X., et al.: Towards multi-center glaucoma OCT image screening with semi-supervised joint structure and function multi-task learning. Med. Image Anal. 63, 101695 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeiler, M.D.: ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method (2012). http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the SPEV project, University of Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Informatics and Management, Czech Republic (ID: 2102-2024), “Smart Solutions in Ubiquitous Computing Environments”. We are also grateful for the support of student Michal Dobrovolny for consultations regarding application aspects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawit Assefa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mekonen, H., Tadesse, T., Krejcar, O., Abdella, K., Assefa, D. (2024). GCC Aware Glaucoma Detection Using Macula OCT Image Analysis Based on Deep CNN. In: Nguyen, N.T., et al. Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14811. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70819-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70819-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-70818-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-70819-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics