Skip to main content

DDIs-Graph: an Approach to Identify Drug-Drug Interactions and Recommend Alternative Drugs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 529))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 402 Accesses

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) pose significant risks to patients, ranging from adverse effects to fatal outcomes. Preventing these issues depends on providing caregivers with timely information on DDIs and offering viable alternative options. Currently, there is a gap in the formal specifications of systems designed to alert caregivers about potential DDIs. This gap hinders the development of further support, such as algorithms that can recommend alternative drugs. This study adopts the Design Science approach, defining a formal knowledge graph to capture DDIs. Then, algorithms are defined to identify drug interactions and suggest alternative medications with less severe consequences. As a proof of concept, we implemented our approach using Neo4j and Python, transforming data from the Swedish DDIs database. The implementation was applied to real care session data in the healthcare region of Stockholm for a randomly selected day, focusing on instances where caregivers prescribed drugs with severe DDIs. Validation occurred through expert interviews, discussing the correctness and utility of the approach. Results indicate that our graph-based model effectively supports the development of systems that alert caregivers to potential DDIs and recommend alternative drugs with reduced interactions. To the best of our knowledge, this paper introduces the first graph-based model serving as a blueprint for developing DDI systems. This model enables systems to i) warn caregivers about the presence of DDIs in prescribed drugs and ii) assess the availability of alternative drugs with less severe interactions, providing recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson, M.L., Böttiger, Y., Bastholm-Rahmner, P., Ovesjö, M.-L., Veg, A., Eiermann, B.: Evaluation of usage patterns and user perception of the drug-drug interaction database SFINX. Int. J. Med. Informatics 84(5), 327–333 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, E.P., Wang, S.M., Hines, L.E., Gao, S., Patel, B.V., Malone, D.C.: Evaluation of a drug-drug interaction: fax alert intervention program. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 13(1), 1–9 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergk, V., Gasse, C., Schnell, R., Haefeli, W.E.: Requirements for a successful implementation of drug interaction information systems in general practice: results of a questionnaire survey in Germany. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 60(8), 595–602 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berti, A., et al.: OCEL (Object-Centric Event Log) 2.0 Specification (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esser, S., Fahland, D.: Multi-dimensional event data in graph databases. J. Data Semant. 10(1), 109–141 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giardina, C., et al.: Adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: results of the forward (facilitation of reporting in hospital ward) study. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 350 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jalali, A.: Graph-based process mining. In: Leemans, S., Leopold, H. (eds.) ICPM 2020. LNBIP, vol. 406, pp. 273–285. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72693-5_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jalali, A.: Object type clustering using Markov directly-follow multigraph in object-centric process mining. IEEE Access 10, 126569–126579 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jalali, A., et al.: Evaluating a clinical decision support system for drug-drug interactions. In: MEDINFO 2019, pp. 1500–1501. IOS Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jalali, A., et al.: dfgcompare: a library to support process variant analysis through Markov models. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making 21(1), 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01715-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: An Introduction to Design Science. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78132-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Khayatbashi, S., Hartig, O., Jalali, A.: Transforming event knowledge graph to object-centric event logs: a comparative study for multi-dimensional process analysis. In: Almeida, J.P.A., Borbinha, J., Guizzardi, G., Link, S., Zdravkovic, J. (eds.) International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, vol. 14320, pp. 220–238. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47262-6_12

  13. Khayatbashi, S., Hartig, O., Jalali, A.: Transforming object-centric event logs to temporal event knowledge graphs. In: International Workshop on Business Process Management (accepted) (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B.H., Corey, P.N.: Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279(15), 1200–1205 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Magro, L., Moretti, U., Leone, R.: Epidemiology and characteristics of adverse drug reactions caused by drug-drug interactions. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 11(1), 83–94 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McMullin, S.T., Reichley, R.M., Watson, L.A., Steib, S.A., Frisse, M.E., Bailey, T.C.: Impact of a web-based clinical information system on cisapride drug interactions and patient safety. Arch. Intern. Med. 159(17), 2077–2082 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nabovati, E., et al.: Information technology-based interventions to improve drug-drug interaction outcomes: a systematic review on features and effects. J. Med. Syst. 41(1), 1–17 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Polidori, P., Di Giorgio, C., Provenzani, A.: Incidence of potential drug interactions in a transplant centre setting and relevance of electronic alerts for clinical practice support. J. Innov. Health Inform. 20(4), 257–262 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Strom, B.L., Schinnar, R., Bilker, W., Hennessy, S., Leonard, C.E., Pifer, E.: Randomized clinical trial of a customized electronic alert requiring an affirmative response compared to a control group receiving a commercial passive CPOE alert: NSAID-warfarin co-prescribing as a test case. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17(4), 411–415 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Region Stockholm with ethical approval no. 2018/968-31/5 granted by the Stockholm Regional Ethical Review Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Jalali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jalali, A., Johannesson, P., Perjons, E. (2024). DDIs-Graph: an Approach to Identify Drug-Drug Interactions and Recommend Alternative Drugs. In: Řepa, V., Matulevičius, R., Laurenzi, E. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 529. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71333-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71333-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71332-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-71333-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics