Skip to main content

Pitfalls in Processing Infinite-Length Sequences with Popular Approaches for Sequential Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition (ANNPR 2024)

Abstract

One of the enduring challenges for the Machine Learning community is developing models that can process and learn from very long data sequences. Transformer-based models and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) have excelled in processing long sequences, yet face challenges in transitioning to processing infinite-length sequences online, a crucial step in mimicking human learning over continuous data streams. While Transformer models handle large context windows efficiently, they suffer from quadratic computational costs, motivating research into alternative attention mechanisms. Conversely, RNNs, particularly Deep State-Space Models (SSMs), have shown promise in long sequence tasks, outperforming Transformers in certain benchmarks. However, current approaches are limited to finite-length sequences, which are pre-buffered and randomly shuffled to cope with stochastic gradient descent. This paper addresses the fundamental gap in transitioning from offline-processing of a dataset of sequences to online-processing of possibly infinite-length sequences, a scenario often neglected in existing research. Empirical evidence is presented, demonstrating the performance and limits of existing models. We highlight the challenges and opportunities in learning from a continuous data stream, paving the way for future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    From [29]: “an on-line algorithm, designed to be used to train a network while it runs; no manual state resets or segmentations of the training stream is required”. From [8]: LSTMs were introduced with a learning algorithm that unlike BPTT is “local in space and time”, where “there is no need to store activation values observed during sequence processing in a stack with potentially unlimited size”.

  2. 2.

    \(D\ne 0\) introduces a skip connection that was not included in the original Elman network [4].

  3. 3.

    Transformers usually include multiple multi-head attention-based layers interleaved by FFNs. We considered a simple head, with no further projections, to better connect it to the RNN case.

  4. 4.

    For a detailed description of each dataset, see [32], except for Synth, which is a sinusoidal signal at frequency of 2.8 mHz, with 36000 samples.

  5. 5.

    We used/adapted the code of the authors of [18, 32], and the library of [12].

  6. 6.

    In FSNet, Synth data, we considered the second-best sets of parameter values, since the best ones were yielding numerical errors.

References

  1. Betti, A., Casoni, M., Gori, M., Marullo, S., Melacci, S., Tiezzi, M.: Neural time-reversed generalized riccati equation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, pp. 7935–7942 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Betti, A., et al.: Continual learning through Hamilton equations. In: Conference on Lifelong Learning Agents, vol. 199, pp. 201–212. PMLR (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Betti, A., Gori, M., Melacci, S.: Cognitive action laws: the case of visual features. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 31(3), 938–949 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2911174

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Elman, J.L.: Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14(2), 179–211 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anil, R.G., et al.: Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gori, M., Melacci, S.: Collectionless artificial intelligence. arXiv 2309.06938 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunasekara, N., Pfahringer, B., Gomes, H.M., Bifet, A.: Survey on online streaming continual learning. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI, pp. 6628–6637 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katharopoulos, A., Vyas, A., Pappas, N., Fleuret, F.: Transformers are RNNs: fast autoregressive transformers with linear attention. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5156–5165 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lipton, Z.C., Berkowitz, J., Elkan, C.: A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv:1506.00019 (2015)

  11. Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 (2017)

  12. Marschall, O., Cho, K., Savin, C.: A unified framework of online learning algorithms for training recurrent neural networks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21(1), 5320–5353 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Marullo, S., Tiezzi, M., Betti, A., Faggi, L., Meloni, E., Melacci, S.: Continual unsupervised learning for optical flow estimation with deep networks. In: Conference on Lifelong Learning Agents, pp. 183–200. PMLR (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Massaroli, S., et al.: Laughing hyena distillery: extracting compact recurrences from convolutions. In: Advances in NeurIPS (2023). https://openreview.net/forum?id=OWELckerm6

  15. Orvieto, A., et al.: Resurrecting recurrent neural networks for long sequences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06349 (2023)

  16. Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., Bengio, Y.: On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In: International Conference on ML, pp. 1310–1318 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peng, H., Pappas, N., Yogatama, D., Schwartz, R., Smith, N., Kong, L.: Random feature attention. In: ICLR (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=QtTKTdVrFBB

  18. Pham, Q., Liu, C., Sahoo, D., Hoi, S.: Learning fast and slow for online time series forecasting. In: ICLR (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rumelhart, D.E., et al.: Learning internal representations by error propagation (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salehinejad, H., Sankar, S., Barfett, J., Colak, E., Valaee, S.: Recent advances in recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.01078 (2017)

  21. Schäfer, A.M., Zimmermann, H.G.: Recurrent neural networks are universal approximators. In: Kollias, S.D., Stafylopatis, A., Duch, W., Oja, E. (eds.) ICANN 2006. LNCS, vol. 4131, pp. 632–640. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11840817_66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, J.T., Warrington, A., Linderman, S.W.: Simplified state space layers for sequence modeling. preprint arXiv:2208.04933 (2022)

  23. Tallec, C., Ollivier, Y.: Unbiased online recurrent optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05043 (2017)

  24. Tay, Y., et al.: Long range arena: a benchmark for efficient transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.04006 (2020)

  25. Tiezzi, M., Marullo, S., Faggi, L., Meloni, E., Betti, A., Melacci, S.: Stochastic coherence over attention trajectory for continuous learning in video streams. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-22, pp. 3480–3486 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tiezzi, M., Melacci, S., Betti, A., Maggini, M., Gori, M.: Focus of attention improves information transfer in visual features. In: Advances in NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 22194–22204 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in NeurIPS, vol. 30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Werbos, P.J.: Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proc. IEEE 78(10), 1550–1560 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams, R.J., Peng, J.: An efficient gradient-based algorithm for on-line training of recurrent network trajectories. Neural Comput. 2(4), 490–501 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams, R.J., Zipser, D.: A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 1(2), 270–280 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu, Y., Si, X., Hu, C., Zhang, J.: A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures. Neural Comput. 31(7), 1235–1270 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, H., et al.: Informer: beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on AI, vol. 35(12), pp. 11106–11115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i12.17325, https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/17325

  33. Zucchet, N., Meier, R., Schug, S., Mujika, A., Sacramento, J.: Online learning of long range dependencies. In: NeurIPS (2023)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Casoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Casoni, M., Guidi, T., Tiezzi, M., Betti, A., Gori, M., Melacci, S. (2024). Pitfalls in Processing Infinite-Length Sequences with Popular Approaches for Sequential Data. In: Suen, C.Y., Krzyzak, A., Ravanelli, M., Trentin, E., Subakan, C., Nobile, N. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition. ANNPR 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 15154. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71602-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71602-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71601-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-71602-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics