Skip to main content

Circular Product Development Framework Enhancing Extended Producer Responsibility – A Medical Device Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Environments (APMS 2024)

Abstract

The healthcare industry, a significant contributor to carbon emissions, faces increasing pressure to reconcile environmental sustainability with delivering high-quality patient care. A shift from linear production is necessary for the transition to the Circular Economy. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes, which consider the environmental performance of products throughout their lifecycle, hold great promise for driving this circular transition. Under EPR, product development must take a comprehensive life-cycle perspective, which includes manufacturing, pricing, product use, end-of-life disposal and remanufacturing processes. This study introduces the concept of ‘Circular Product Development’, which integrates circular economy principles to reduce the carbon footprint within the healthcare supply chain and mitigate the bullwhip effect. Circular product development aims to consider how products are designed, used and managed after use to minimise waste and environmental impact, in line with Circular Economy Goals (CEGs). Through a synthesis of literature analysis and qualitative analysis using a case study, this paper develop a new framework promotes the adoption of circular product development strategies to shift away from linear consumption patterns. Additionally, it takes a holistic approach to comply with the European Commission’s Council Directive 93/42/EEC on medical device standards and considers Conformité Européenne (CE) certification to ensure consumer safety during the circular transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pichler, P.P., Jaccard, I.S., Weisz, U., Weisz, H.: International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environ. Res. Lett. 14(6) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab19e1

  2. Eckelman, M.J., Huang, K., Lagasse, R., Senay, E., Dubrow, R., Sherman, J.D.: Health care pollution and public health damage in the united states: an update. Health Aff. 39(12), 2071–2079 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma, H.B., Vanapalli, K.R., Samal, B., Cheela, V.R.S., Dubey, B.K., Bhattacharya, J.: Circular economy approach in solid waste management system to achieve UN-SDGs: solutions for post-COVID recovery. Sci. Total. Environ. 800, 149605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannon, E., Kuhlmann, M., Thaidigsmann, B.: Developing products for a circular economy. McKinsey Center. Sustainability & Resource Productivity, pp. 1–4 (2016). http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/developing-products-for-a-circular-economy

  5. European Commission: Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(67)90036-2

  6. Maitre-Ekern, E.: Re-thinking producer responsibility for a sustainable circular economy from extended producer responsibility to pre-market producer responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 286 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125454

  7. OECD: The OECD Inventory of Circular Economy indicators, pp. 1–57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1787/10ac6ae4-en

  8. Subramanian, R., Gupta, S., Talbot, B.: Product design and supply chain coordination under extended producer responsibility. Prod. Oper. Manag. 18(3), 259–277 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01018.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Z., Wan, M.D., Zheng, X.X., Koh, S.C.L.: Fairness concerns and extended producer responsibility transmission in a circular supply chain. Ind. Mark. Manag. 102, 216–228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, X.Q., Yuan, X.G.: The system dynamics model in electronic products closed-loop supply chain distribution network with three-way recovery and the old-for-new policy. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4074710

  11. Pouikli, K.: Concretising the role of extended producer responsibility in European Union waste law and policy through the lens of the circular economy. ERA Forum 20(4), 491–508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00596-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Panescu, D.: Medical device development. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine, EMBC 2009, pp. 5591–5594 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333490

  13. Marešová, P., et al.: Complexity stage model of the medical device development based on economic evaluation-MedDee. Sustainability 12(5), 1–26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietzsch, J.B., Shluzas, L.A., Paté-Cornell, M.E., Yock, P.G., Linehan, J.H.: Stage-gate process for the development of medical devices. J. Med. Dev. Trans. ASME 3(2) (2009). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3148836

  15. Money, A.G., Barnett, J., Kuljis, J., Craven, M.P., Martin, J.L., Young, T.: The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: Medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 11(1), 15 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boulding, K.E.: Environmental quality in a growing economy. Technol. Cult. 8(4), 523 (1967). https://doi.org/10.2307/3102137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Voudrias, E.A.: Healthcare waste management from the point of view of circular economy. Waste Manag. 75, 1–2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Geisendorf, S., Pietrulla, F.: The circular economy and circular economic concepts—a literature analysis and redefinition. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 60(5), 771–782 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kane, G.M., Bakker, C.A., Balkenende, A.R.: Towards design strategies for circular medical products. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135(July), 38–47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization: Circular economy and health: opportunities and risks (2018). http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest%0Ahttp://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/circular-economy-and-health-opportunities-and-risks-2018%0Ahttp://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest

  21. European Commission: Medical Devices Regulation. (EU) 2017/745, vol. 10, pp. 1–21 (2017). https://www.medical-device-regulation.eu/download-mdr/

  22. Guzzo, D., Carvalho, M.M., Balkenende, R., Mascarenhas, J.: Circular business models in the medical device industry: paths towards sustainable healthcare. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 160, 104904 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104904

  23. EU MDR: European Medical Device Regulation, May 2021. https://www.bd.com/en-us

  24. . Lie, F., Sanchez-Gordon, M., Colomo-Palacios, R.: DevOps in an ISO 13485 regulated environment: a multivocal literature review. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3382494.3410679

  25. Sharma, A., Luthra, G.: Implementing a risk-based approach to quality management system ISO-13485 processes in compliance with EUMDR 2017/745 for medical device industry. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 35(13), 8–19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2023/v35i137365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Teferra, M.N.: ISO 14971-medical device risk management standard. Int. J. Latest Res. Eng. Technol. (IJLRET) 03, 83–87 (2017). www.ijlret.com

  27. E. Council: Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC. SPL Certification, June 1993, pp. 1–60 (1993). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31993L0042

  28. Tebbutt, E., Brodmann, R., Borg, J., MacLachlan, M., Khasnabis, C., Horvath, R.: Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Glob. Health 12(1), 1–6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0220-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin, R.K.: The case study crisis: some answers. Case Stud. 26(1), III3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915480.n38

  30. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D., Yang, M.C.: Product Design and Development, 7th edn. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. CEDOC AB: About CEDOC (2024). https://cedoc.com/en/about-us/

  32. Richter, J.L., Koppejan, R.: Extended producer responsibility for lamps in Nordic countries: best practices and challenges in closing material loops. J. Clean. Prod. 123(2016), 167–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to Mikel M. Dongelmans, Product and Development manager at Alu Rehab AS, for his valuable support and contributions to this article.

Declarations

Funding. The Norwegian Program for Capacity Development supported this research through the Higher Education and Research for Development (NORHED II) Project ID 68085 initiative for the project, “Enhancing Lean Practices in Supply Chains: Digitalization,” under the sub-theme of “Politics and Economic Governance.” This project is a collaboration involving ITB (Indonesia), the University of Stavanger (Norway), and the University of Moratuwa (Sri Lanka).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kartika Nur Alfina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alfina, K.N., Ratnayake, R.M.C. (2024). Circular Product Development Framework Enhancing Extended Producer Responsibility – A Medical Device Case Study. In: Thürer, M., Riedel, R., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Environments. APMS 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71621-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-71622-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics