Skip to main content

Abstract

Energy efficiency is crucial for reducing the climate footprint, enhancing green transformation and improving the economy and energy resilience. This paper aims to identify and demonstrate gaps between industrial practices found in empirical case studies and academic knowledge of industrial best practices for energy-efficient manufacturing design. The paper uses empirical cases where environmental and energy-value stream mapping and Green Kaizen tools were used to analyse production operations, highlighting potential operational and design improvements in production equipment and systems, and showing there are still large opportunities for energy efficiency improvements in manufacturing operations, which can save money and reduce environmental impact. Yet, several inefficiencies are determined in the equipment and production system's design phase, which are challenging to change once the equipment is in operation. The secondary climate effect of energy savings in a Swedish context, where unused electricity can replace fossil-based electricity, is discussed. The paper contributes to theory by linking previous research findings with the current industrial challenges and opportunities for energy and sustainability in operations management. The paper provides results and knowledge to help the industry improve energy efficiency in production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interest.

References

  1. Khraiche, M., Kutlu, L., Mao, X.: Energy efficiencies of European countries. Appl. Econ. 54(23), 2694–2706 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IEA: World energy outlook 2022. Paris, France: IEA (2022). https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022. Accessed14 Oct 2023

  3. Fleiter, T., Schleich, J., Ravivanpong, P.: Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—an empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany. Energy Policy 51, 863–875 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thollander, P., Rohdin, P., Moshfegh, B., Karlsson, M., Söderström, M., Trygg, L.: Energy in Swedish industry 2020–current status, policy instruments, and policy implications. J. Clean. Prod. 51, 109–117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., De Donatis, A.: A framework to characterize energy efficiency measures. Appl. Energy 118, 207–220 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cagno, E., Trianni, A.: Evaluating the barriers to specific industrial energy efficiency measures: an exploratory study in small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 82, 70–83 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thollander, P., et al.: Energinyckeltal och växthusgasutsläpp baserade på industrins energianvändande processer: Slutrapport (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, L., Ball, P.: Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 227–238 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller, E., Stock, T., Schillig, R.: A method to generate energy value-streams in production and logistics in respect of time-and energy-consumption. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 8, 243–251 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurdve, M., et al.: Use of environmental value stream mapping and environmental loss analysis in lean manufacturing work at Volvo. In: Proceedings of the 4th Swedish Production Symposium (SPS11), pp. 3–5, May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jönbrink, A.K., Norrblom, H.L., Zackrisson, M.: Ekodesign: praktisk vägledning. Swerea IVF (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duflou, J.R., et al.: Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: a processes and systems approach. CIRP Ann. 61(2), 587–609 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krones, M., Müller, E.: An approach for reducing energy consumption in factories by providing suitable energy efficiency measures. Procedia CIRP 17, 505–510 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thollander, P., et al.: Int. study on energy end-use data among industrial SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) and energy end-use efficiency improvement opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 104, 282–296 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Volvo AB: Volvo Group Technical Specification for Production Equipment, TS2023:1, Volvo AB, Sweden (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kurdve, M.: Chemical management services from a product service system perspective: experiences of fluid management services from Volvo Group metalworking plants (Licenciate dissertation, IIIEE dissertations) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurdve, M., Bellgran, M.: Green lean operationalisation of the circular economy concept on production shop floor level. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123223 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruch, J., et al.: Development of Robust Production Equipment: A guide to strong collaboration between users and suppliers. Arkitektkopia, Västerås, Sweden (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rösiö, C., Bruch, J.: Exploring the design process of reconfigurable industrial production systems: activities, challenges, and tactics. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohammadi, Z., Shahbazi, S., Kurdve, M.: Critical factors in designing of lean and green equipment. In: Cambridge International Manufacturing Symposium (CIM conference), September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  21. Islam, M.H., Chavez, Z., Bellgran, M.: An exploratory study on integrating sustainability aspects during the acquisition of production equipment. In: SPS2020, pp. 59–70. IOS Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dües, C.M., Tan, K.H., Lim, M.: Green as the new Lean: how to use Lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 40, 93–100 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shahbazi, S., Kurdve, M., Zackrisson, M., Jönsson, C., Kristinsdottir, A.R.: Comparison of four environmental assessment tools in Swedish manufacturing: a case study. Sustainability 11(7), 217322 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zokaei, K., Manikas, I., Lovins, H.: Environment is free; but it's not a gift. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bellgran, M., Kurdve, M., Hanna, R.: Cost driven Green Kaizen in pharmaceutical production–creating positive engagement for environmental improvements. Procedia CIRP 81, 1219–1224 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. The Production Leap (Produktionslyftet in Swedish). https://www.produktionslyftet.se/. Accessed 27 Oct 2023

  27. The Green Transition Leap (Omställningslyftet in Swedish). https://www.ri.se/en/greentransitionleap. Accessed 10 Oct 23

  28. Chadrasekaran, G., Ternström, N.: Identifying energy and greenhouse gas hotspots in the supply network of an industrial equipment supplier company (2022). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/305393. Accessed 10 Oct 2023

  29. Thorne, N.: Towards Lean & Green production management in the pharmaceutical industry: A framework for E-VSM and Kaizen event prioritization through a systematic literature review and case study at AstraZeneca (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Magnusson, D.: 5 Better off alone? The development of citizen involvement and community energy in the Swedish energy transition. Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region: Understanding Stakeholder Engagement and Community Acceptance (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments and Author Contributions

The study was part of the Vinnova funded project Green Design (Dnr 2022-01338) and is within the XPRES initiative for Excellence in Production Research. Cases were also connected to Vinnova funded Scarce II, Grön Kaizen and to the SME development programs the Green Transition Leap, and the Production Leap. Authors contributed as follows: conceptualization and method, M.K., literature, M.K. empirics, M.K., N.T., G.C. formal analysis, validation M.K., Z.C., discussion and conclusion M.K., Z.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kurdve .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kurdve, M., Chavez, Z.Z., Ternström, N., Chandrasekaran, G. (2024). Energy Efficiency and Improvement Needs in Swedish Manufacturing SMEs. In: Thürer, M., Riedel, R., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Environments. APMS 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71621-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-71622-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics