Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Factors Influencing the Quality of Augmented Reality Applications: a Conceptual Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Extended Reality (XR Salento 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 15027))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 438 Accesses

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) technology has revolutionized how users interact with digital content in real-world environments. However, ensuring the quality of AR experiences remains a complex challenge due to the diverse factors influencing user perception and satisfaction. To address this challenge, researchers and developers are turning to conceptual models that provide structured frameworks for evaluating and optimizing AR quality. This paper explores the development of such a conceptual model, aiming to define the scope, objectives, and metrics for assessing AR quality comprehensively. By considering components such as visual fidelity, interaction responsiveness, spatial alignment accuracy, and semantic coherence, the model seeks to provide a systematic approach to AR quality assessment. Additionally, factors such as hardware capabilities, software optimization, user interaction design, and environmental conditions are integrated into the model to capture their influence on AR quality. Despite promising advancements, challenges such as model simplicity, subjectivity in metrics, and validation remain. Through ongoing research and refinement, the proposed conceptual model aims to enhance AR development practices, foster innovation, and improve user satisfaction across diverse AR applications and environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw, A., et al.: The Future Direction of Enhancing User Experience and Interaction Design in Augmented Reality Systems

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dargan, S., et al.: Augmented reality: a comprehensive review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 30(2), 1057–1080 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mendoza-Ramírez, C.E., et al.: Augmented reality: survey. Appl. Sci. 13(18), 10491 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vertucci, R., et al.: History of augmented reality. In: Springer Handbook of Augmented Reality, pp. 35–50. Springer (2023)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwenderling, L., et al.: Activation modes for gesture-based interaction with a magic lens in AR anatomy visualisation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Visualiz. 11(4), 1243–1250 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duan, H., et al.: Confusing image quality assessment: toward better augmented reality experience. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 31, 7206–7221 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao, J., et al.: Mobile augmented reality: User interfaces, frameworks, and intelligence. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(9), 1–36 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sielhorst, T., et al.: Campar: a software framework guaranteeing quality for medical augmented reality. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 1, 29 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, L., Dong, H., El Saddik, A.: Towards a QoE model to evaluate holographic augmented reality devices. IEEE Multimedia 26(2), 21–32 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelke, U., Nguyen, H., Ketchell, S.: Quality of augmented reality experience: a correlation analysis. In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO, ISO/IEC 23000–13: Information technology - Multimedia application format (MPEG-A), Part 13: Augmented reality application format. 2017, ISO (2017). https://www.iso.org/standard/69465.html

  12. Merenda, C., et al. Effects of vehicle simulation visual fidelity on assessing driver performance and behavior. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park, M., Yoo, J.: Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: a mental imagery perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 52, 101912 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarlin, P.-E., et al.: Lamar: Benchmarking localization and mapping for augmented reality. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20071-7_4

  15. Dinis, F.M., et al.: Extending access to BIM information: merging augmented reality interfaces and semantic enrichment. In: New Advances in Building Information Modeling and Engineering Management, pp. 17-29. Springer (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30247-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Qamar, S., Anwar, Z., Afzal, M.: A systematic threat analysis and defense strategies for the metaverse and extended reality systems. Comput. Secur. 128, 103127 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vakaliuk, T.A., Pochtoviuk, S.I.: Analysis of tools for the development of augmented reality technologies. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeuffer, K., et al.: ARtention: a design space for gaze-adaptive user interfaces in augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 95, 1–12 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baker, L., et al.: Localization and tracking of stationary users for augmented reality. Vis. Comput. 40(1), 227–244 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghazwani, Y., Smith, S.: Interaction in augmented reality: challenges to enhance user experience. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulations (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daling, L.M., Schlittmeier, S.J.: Effects of augmented reality-, virtual reality-, and mixed reality–based training on objective performance measures and subjective evaluations in manual assembly tasks: a scoping review. Hum. Factors 66(2), 589–626 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vinci, C., et al.: The clinical potential of augmented reality. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 27(3), 110 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Panchenko, L.F., Muzyka, I.O.: Analytical review of augmented reality MOOCs (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Becerra, M., Ierache, J., Abasolo, M.J.: Interoperable dynamic procedure interactions on semantic augmented reality browsers. In: International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87595-4_15

  25. Liao, T.: Standards and their (recurring) stories: how augmented reality markup language was built on stories of past standards. Sci. Technol. Human Values 45(4), 712–737 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

    Mohammad Abdallah, Gana Sawalhi & Mustafa AlRifaee

  2. University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

    Ahmad Mazhar

Authors
  1. Mohammad Abdallah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gana Sawalhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Mazhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mustafa AlRifaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Abdallah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Salento, Lecce, Italy

    Lucio Tommaso De Paolis

  2. University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Pasquale Arpaia

  3. CNR-STIIMA, Lecco, Italy

    Marco Sacco

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abdallah, M., Sawalhi, G., Mazhar, A., AlRifaee, M. (2024). Factors Influencing the Quality of Augmented Reality Applications: a Conceptual Framework. In: De Paolis, L.T., Arpaia, P., Sacco, M. (eds) Extended Reality. XR Salento 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71707-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71707-9_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71706-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-71707-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics