Skip to main content

Exploring the Application and Usability of Emerging Technologies in Neuromotor Rehabilitation for a Patient with 5Q-Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 2 Receiving a Gene-Based Therapy: A Single Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Extended Reality (XR Salento 2024)

Abstract

Emerging technologies like virtual reality (VR) and telerehabilitation (TR) may provide numerous advantages for treatment of patients with neuromuscular and musculoskeletal disorders. Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a progressive neuromuscular disorder presents challenges in motor function rehabilitation. However, to date no studies have evaluated the use and usability of new technologies in the treatment of patients with SMA. This case study examines the effectiveness of a particular VR-based telerehabilitation system, Khymeia – Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System, in improving upper limb motor recovery in a 13-year-old patient with Type 2 SMA who is receiving gene-based therapy (GBT) with Risdiplam. Motor function was assessed using the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), and usability of K-VRRS was evaluated with the System Usability Scale (SUS). The results indicated stable motor function during the baseline phase, with significant improvement observed at the post-treatment assessment. The SUS score reflected high usability of the K-VRRS. This suggests that combining GBT with VR-based telerehabilitation could enhance upper limb motor function in SMA patients.

Further research is needed to confirm these findings and investigate the potential of K-VRRS in enhancing patient motivation and treatment adherence in SMA rehabilitation.

G. Barraco and L. Macchitella—These authors contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rizzo, A., Buckwalter, J., van der Zaag, C.: Virtual Environment Applications in Clinical Neuropsychology. The Handbook of Virtual Environments, pp. 1027–1064 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spina, E., et al.: Digital technologies, web and social media study group of the Italian society of neurology (SIN): how to manage with telemedicine people with neuromuscular diseases? Neurol. Sci. 42, 3553–3559 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05396-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Riva, G., Mancuso, V., Cavedoni, S., Stramba-Badiale, C.: Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation: a review of its effects on multiple cognitive domains. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 17, 1035–1061 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2020.1825939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pournajaf, S., Morone, G., Goffredo, M., Bonaiuti, D., Franceschini, M., Pournajaf, S.: Realtà virtuale applicata alla riabilitazione: evidenze cliniche e prospettive future. https://springerhealthcare.it/mr/archivio/realta-virtuale-applicata-alla-riabilitazione-evidenze-cliniche-e-prospettive-future/. Accessed 11 Apr 2024

  5. Tieri, G., Morone, G., Paolucci, S., Iosa, M.: Virtual reality in cognitive and motor rehabilitation: facts, fiction and fallacies. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 15, 107–117 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2018.1425613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Piron, L., et al.: Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med 41, 1016–1102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Howard, I.M., Kaufman, M.S.: Telehealth applications for outpatients with neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle Nerve 58, 475–485 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Massetti, T., et al.: The clinical utility of virtual reality in neurorehabilitation: a systematic review. J. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Dis. 10, 1179573518813541 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1179573518813541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nuara, A., Fabbri-Destro, M., Scalona, E., Lenzi, S.E., Rizzolatti, G., Avanzini, P.: Telerehabilitation in response to constrained physical distance: an opportunity to rethink neurorehabilitative routines. J. Neurol. 269, 627–638 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10397-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schultheis, M.T., Rizzo, A.A.: The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabil. Psychol. 46, 296–311 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.46.3.296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Turolla, A., Rossettini, G., Viceconti, A., Palese, A., Geri, T.: Musculoskeletal physical therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: is telerehabilitation the answer? Phys. Ther. 100, 1260–1264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, J., Shi, P., Yu, H.: A virtual reality rehabilitation training system based on upper limb exoskeleton robot. Presented at the August 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IHMSC.2018.00058

  13. Trabacca, A., Lucarelli, E., Pacifico, R., Vespino, T., Di Liddo, A., Losito, L.: The international classification of functioning, disability and health-children and youth as a framework for the management of spinal muscular atrophy in the era of gene therapy: a proof-of-concept study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 56, 243–251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.20.05968-7

  14. Trabacca, A.: Neuromuscular diseases rehabilitation in the era of gene therapy. Neurol. Sci. 41, 1971–1972 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04280-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Macchitella, L., et al.: A narrative review of the use of a cutting-edge virtual reality rehabilitation technology in neurological and neuropsychological rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 53, 439–457 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-230066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazzone, E.S., et al.: Revised upper limb module for spinal muscular atrophy: Development of a new module. Muscle Nerve 55, 869–874 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manenti, R., et al.: Effectiveness of an innovative cognitive treatment and telerehabilitation on subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a multicenter, randomized Active-Controlled Study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12, 585988 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.585988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pagliari, C., et al.: Effects of home-based virtual reality telerehabilitation system in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. J. Telemedicine Telecare. 1357633X211054839-N/A (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211054839

  19. Brooke, J.: SUS -- a quick and dirty usability scale. Presented at the January 1 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mirea, A., et al.: Physical therapy and nusinersen impact on spinal muscular atrophy rehabilitative outcome. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed). 27, 179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2706179

  21. Yi, Y.G., Shin, H.-I., Jang, D.-H.: Rehabilitation of spinal muscular atrophy: current consensus and future direction. J. Genetic Med. 17, 55–61 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5734/JGM.2020.17.2.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Billeci, L., Tonacci, A., Morales, M., Astrea, G., Battini, R.: An alternative approach to home-based rehabilitation of children with spinal muscular atrophy. Presented at the March 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComWorkshops53856.2022.9767459

  23. Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 24, 574–594 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pera, M.C., et al.: ISMAC Consortium Group: revised upper limb module for spinal muscular atrophy: 12 month changes. Muscle Nerve 59, 426–430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nissen, T., Wynn, R.: The clinical case report: a review of its merits and limitations. BMC. Res. Notes 7, 264 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the “5 per mille” 2021 – funds for biomedical research by Antonio Trabacca and by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente funds).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Trabacca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Barraco, G., Macchitella, L., Accogli, G., Pirani, G., Nicolardi, V., Trabacca, A. (2024). Exploring the Application and Usability of Emerging Technologies in Neuromotor Rehabilitation for a Patient with 5Q-Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 2 Receiving a Gene-Based Therapy: A Single Case Study. In: De Paolis, L.T., Arpaia, P., Sacco, M. (eds) Extended Reality. XR Salento 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71710-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71710-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71709-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-71710-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics