Abstract
This paper uses a questionnaire to analyse whether humans can determine simulated emotions in a robot tail and discusses the implications of doing so. The questionnaire, which was open for 3 weeks, asked participants to watch 4 short videos on dog tail movement and 4 short videos on robot tail movement and to pick one of 12 emotions they thought the tail was showing. The robot tail copied the movement of the dog tails, which the participants weren’t made aware of. The possible answers were kept the same for every question, and were split into 4 groups of 3 emotions, with each group containing similar emotions. Results were very positive, with most participants (63.8%) answering within the same group for at least 2 of the 4 pairs, and 87.9% answering within the same group for at least 1 pair, which suggests that humans can determine simulated emotions using a robotic tail. Potential applications of this study include new ways for Human-Robot Interaction to take place, in robots such as companion robots or entertainment robots, and for further research to be completed, such as how accurate participants’ answers are when a robotic tail is used in conjunction with other forms of communication. Thus, this study may be of significance to the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Murphy, R.R., Nomura, T., Billard, A., Burke, J.L.: Human–Robot Interaction. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5481144. Accessed 06 Apr 2024
Sheridan, T.B.: Human–Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0018720816644364?src=getftr. Accessed 06 Apr 2024
Kulíc, D., Croft, E.: Affective state estimation for human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans. Rob. 23, 991–1000 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.904899
Hall, J.A., Horgan, T.G., Murphy, N.A.: Nonverbal communication. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 70, 271–294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-010418-103145/CITE/REFWORKS
Salem, M., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., Joublin, F.: A friendly gesture: investigating the effect of multimodal robot behavior in human-robot interaction. In: RO-MAN (2011)
Admoni, H., Scassellati, B.: Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction: a review. J. Hum. Robot. Interact. 6, 25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.1.Admoni
Hasegawa, M., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M.: Dogs’ body language relevant to learning achievement. Animals 4, 45–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani4010045
Taylor, N.: Anthropomorphism and the animal subject. Hum.-Anim. Stud. 12, 265–280 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004187948.I-348.61
Miklósi, Á., Gácsi, M., Bugnyar, T., Vonk, J., Dolins, F.L.: On the utilization of social animals as a model for social robotics. Front. Psychol. 3, 75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00075
Coeckelbergh, M.: Humans, animals, and robots: a phenomenological approach to human-robot relations. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 197–204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0075-6
Singh, A., Young, J.E.: A dog tail for communicating robotic states. In: 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (2013)
Singh, A., Young, J.E.: Animal-inspired human-robot interaction: a robotic tail for communicating state. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (2012)
Ren, W., Wei, P., Yu, S., Zhang, Y.Q.: Left-right asymmetry and attractor-like dynamics of dog’s tail wagging during dog-human interactions. iScience 25, 104747 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104747
Caddiell, R.M.P., et al.: Veterinary education and experience shape beliefs about dog breeds. Part 2: Trust. Sci. Rep. 13, 13847 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40464-3
Banks, M.R., Willoughby, L.M., Banks, W.A.: Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. JAMDA-Original Stud. 9, 173–177 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007
Sharkey, A.: Sharkey, · Noel: we need to talk about deception in social robotics! Ethics Inf. Technol.. Technol. 23, 309–316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lee, A., Studley, M. (2025). Do People Ascribe Similar Emotions to Real and Robotic Dog Tails?. In: Huda, M.N., Wang, M., Kalganova, T. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 15052. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72062-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72062-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-72061-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-72062-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)