Skip to main content

Abstract

When individuals share resources, they may have to make decisions that don’t always maximize their benefits. Unfortunately, some people may have selfish attitudes, which can result in unfair situations that reduce the overall benefits for everyone. One alternative solution to this problem is cooperation. In this approach, individuals give up some benefits to benefit the group. This attitude is heavily influenced by the human values of the individuals involved and can impact the decision-making process. This paper examines how an agent’s behaviour in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma game, as provided by game theory, can be influenced by Schwartz’s ten basic values theory. The experiments show that when the agent follows Schwartz’s order of preferences for values, it tends to take cooperative actions. On the other hand, when the agent prioritizes values associated with individualism, it results in low overall benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad, F., Al-Fagih, L.: Game theory applications in micro and macroscopic simulations in transportation networks: a comprehensive review. IEEE Access 11, 93635–93663 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3308048

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, F., Shah, Z., Al-Fagih, L.: Applications of evolutionary game theory in urban road transport network: a state of the art review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 98 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104791

  3. Altman, M.: Cooperative organizations as an engine of equitable rural economic development. J. Coop. Organ. Manag. 3(1), 14–23 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Churkin, A., Bialek, J., Pozo, D., Sauma, E., Korgin, N.: Review of cooperative game theory applications in power system expansion planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 145, 111056 (2021)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Feather, N.T., Seligman, C., Olson, J., Zanna, M.: Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: research on tall poppies. In: The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium Volume, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A., Huldtgren, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, pp. 55–95 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fuentes González, F., Sauma, E., van der Weijde, A.: The Scottish experience in community energy development: a starting point for Chile. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.046

  9. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. In: Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 553–603. Springer, New York (2016)

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Guth, W.D., Tagiuri, R.: Personal values and corporate strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 43(5), 123–132 (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Karanik, M., Billhardt, H., Fernandez, A., Ossowski, S.: On the relevance of value system structure for automated value-aligned decision-making. In: The 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium On Applied Computing, SAC 2024, pp. 679–686. ACM, New York (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636057

  12. Lima, S.L.: Iterated prisoner’s dilemma: an approach to evolutionarily stable cooperation. Am. Nat. 134(5), 828–834 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lord, A.: The Planning Game: An Information Economics Approach to Understanding Urban and Environmental Management. Routledge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montes, N., Sierra, C.: Value-guided synthesis of parametric normative systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference AAMAS, pp. 907-915. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rokeach, M.: Rokeach value survey. Nat. Hum, Values (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz, S.H.: An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2, 1–20 (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., Owens, V.: Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32, 519–542 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Serramia, M., Lopez-Sanchez, M., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A.: A qualitative approach to composing value-aligned norm systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference AAMAS, pp. 1233-1241. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Serramia, M., Lopez-Sanchez, M., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A., Morales, J., Wooldridge, M., Ansotegui, C.: Exploiting moral values to choose the right norms. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 264–270. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skovsgaard, L., Jensen, I.G.: Recent trends in biogas value chains explained using cooperative game theory. Energy Econ. 74, 503–522 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.021

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Su, J., Ren, L.: A study on the benefit distribution of mobile publishing industrial chain based on the cooperative game theory. In: Jin, D., Lin, S. (eds.) Advances in Electronic Engineering, Communication and Management, vol. 1, pp. 653–659. Springer, Cham (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27287-5_106

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Yager, R.R.: Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy sets and sys. 59(2), 125–148 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, J.: Tu oligopoly games and industrial cooperation. In: Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, vol. I, pp. 392–422 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by grant VAE: TED2021-131295B-C33 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by the “European Union NextGeneration EU/PRTR”, by grant COSASS: PID2021-123673OB-C32 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”, and by the AGROBOTS Project of Universidad Rey Juan Carlos funded by the Community of Madrid, Spain. Marcelo Karanik has been granted funding by the Spanish Ministry of Universities for the Requalification of the Spanish University System (María Zambrano) 2021–2023 through Rey Juan Carlos University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Karanik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pina-Zapata, A., García-Rodriguez, S., Karanik, M. (2025). Value-Aligned Decisions in Cooperative Environments. In: González-Briones, A., et al. Highlights in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Digital Twins: The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73058-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73058-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-73057-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-73058-0

  • eBook Packages: Artificial Intelligence (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics