Abstract
When individuals share resources, they may have to make decisions that don’t always maximize their benefits. Unfortunately, some people may have selfish attitudes, which can result in unfair situations that reduce the overall benefits for everyone. One alternative solution to this problem is cooperation. In this approach, individuals give up some benefits to benefit the group. This attitude is heavily influenced by the human values of the individuals involved and can impact the decision-making process. This paper examines how an agent’s behaviour in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma game, as provided by game theory, can be influenced by Schwartz’s ten basic values theory. The experiments show that when the agent follows Schwartz’s order of preferences for values, it tends to take cooperative actions. On the other hand, when the agent prioritizes values associated with individualism, it results in low overall benefits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad, F., Al-Fagih, L.: Game theory applications in micro and macroscopic simulations in transportation networks: a comprehensive review. IEEE Access 11, 93635–93663 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3308048
Ahmad, F., Shah, Z., Al-Fagih, L.: Applications of evolutionary game theory in urban road transport network: a state of the art review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 98 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104791
Altman, M.: Cooperative organizations as an engine of equitable rural economic development. J. Coop. Organ. Manag. 3(1), 14–23 (2015)
Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic, New York (1984)
Churkin, A., Bialek, J., Pozo, D., Sauma, E., Korgin, N.: Review of cooperative game theory applications in power system expansion planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 145, 111056 (2021)
Feather, N.T., Seligman, C., Olson, J., Zanna, M.: Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: research on tall poppies. In: The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium Volume, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A., Huldtgren, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, pp. 55–95 (2013)
Fuentes González, F., Sauma, E., van der Weijde, A.: The Scottish experience in community energy development: a starting point for Chile. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.046
Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. In: Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 553–603. Springer, New York (2016)
Guth, W.D., Tagiuri, R.: Personal values and corporate strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 43(5), 123–132 (1965)
Karanik, M., Billhardt, H., Fernandez, A., Ossowski, S.: On the relevance of value system structure for automated value-aligned decision-making. In: The 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium On Applied Computing, SAC 2024, pp. 679–686. ACM, New York (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636057
Lima, S.L.: Iterated prisoner’s dilemma: an approach to evolutionarily stable cooperation. Am. Nat. 134(5), 828–834 (1989)
Lord, A.: The Planning Game: An Information Economics Approach to Understanding Urban and Environmental Management. Routledge (2012)
Montes, N., Sierra, C.: Value-guided synthesis of parametric normative systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference AAMAS, pp. 907-915. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2021)
Rokeach, M.: Rokeach value survey. Nat. Hum, Values (1967)
Schwartz, S.H.: An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2, 1–20 (2012)
Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., Owens, V.: Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32, 519–542 (2001)
Serramia, M., Lopez-Sanchez, M., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A.: A qualitative approach to composing value-aligned norm systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference AAMAS, pp. 1233-1241. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2020)
Serramia, M., Lopez-Sanchez, M., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A., Morales, J., Wooldridge, M., Ansotegui, C.: Exploiting moral values to choose the right norms. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 264–270. ACM, New York (2018)
Skovsgaard, L., Jensen, I.G.: Recent trends in biogas value chains explained using cooperative game theory. Energy Econ. 74, 503–522 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.021
Su, J., Ren, L.: A study on the benefit distribution of mobile publishing industrial chain based on the cooperative game theory. In: Jin, D., Lin, S. (eds.) Advances in Electronic Engineering, Communication and Management, vol. 1, pp. 653–659. Springer, Cham (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27287-5_106
Yager, R.R.: Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy sets and sys. 59(2), 125–148 (1993)
Zhao, J.: Tu oligopoly games and industrial cooperation. In: Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, vol. I, pp. 392–422 (2018)
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by grant VAE: TED2021-131295B-C33 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by the “European Union NextGeneration EU/PRTR”, by grant COSASS: PID2021-123673OB-C32 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”, and by the AGROBOTS Project of Universidad Rey Juan Carlos funded by the Community of Madrid, Spain. Marcelo Karanik has been granted funding by the Spanish Ministry of Universities for the Requalification of the Spanish University System (María Zambrano) 2021–2023 through Rey Juan Carlos University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pina-Zapata, A., García-Rodriguez, S., Karanik, M. (2025). Value-Aligned Decisions in Cooperative Environments. In: González-Briones, A., et al. Highlights in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Digital Twins: The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73058-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73058-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-73057-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-73058-0
eBook Packages: Artificial Intelligence (R0)