Abstract
The main objective of this paper is to report on the impact of a game-based museum school visit on player experience while solving complex problems about food production. We used a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of digital traces with qualitative case studies to assess how players engage with the mixed reality game AL2049. The data includes digital traces from 174 games and video recordings collected via on-board cameras. Our results reveal clusters characterizing attitudes towards complexity, identifying four categories of players: Explorers, Rushers, Strategists, and Inactive. Through case studies of these categories, using a dedicated model, we identified the dimensions that characterize their subjective experiences. This model highlights player experiences across four main dimensions: actions, information processing, knowledge, and emotions. Our results highlight the tension that can arise in game-based learning between the way the game is designed and the way it is played. They also underscore the value of using mixed methods to analyze the player’s experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Although designed for museum play, a web version is available for teachers to replay in the classroom (available in English, French and German): https://www.alimentarium.org/sites/default/files/games/AL2049/index.html.
- 2.
The game, created for an Italian historical residence, uses narrative and game mechanics to engage teenagers with its 18th-century history, encouraging exploration and aiding their interpretation of the museum’s content [40].
References
Tongpaeng, Y., Nobnop, R., Wongwan, N., Homla, P., Intawong, K., Puritat, K.: Comparison of gamified and non-gamified mixed reality in enhancing museum visitor engagement, motivation, and learning outcome. J. Herit. Tourism, 1–30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2024.2351852
Kiili, K.: Digital game-based learning: towards an experiential gaming model. Internet High. Educ. 8(1), 13–24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001
Davallon, J., Gottesdiener, H., Vilatte, J.-C.: A quoi peuvent donc servir les recherches sur les visiteurs. Cult. Musées 8(1), 161–172 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3406/pumus.2006.1411
Hofer, B., Sinatra, G.: Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: musings on an emerging field. Metacogn. Learn. 5, 113–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9051-7
Bonnat, C., Oliveira, G., Sanchez, E.: “Geome”, un juego para comprender el Antropoceno durante las visitas escolares a un museo. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra 28(1), Article 1 (2020)
Morard, S., Sanchez, E., Bonnat, C.: Museum games and personal epistemology: a study on students’ critical thinking with a mixed reality game. Int. J. Serious Games 10(4), Article 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v10i4.695
Lieberoth, A., Roepstorff, A.: Mixed methods in game research: playing on strengths and countering weaknesses. In: Game Research Methods, pp. 271–289. ETC Press (2015)
Morard, S., Sanchez, E., Oliveira, G., Godinot, N.: AL2049, a Playful Museum’s Visit to Grasp the Issues of Complexity (2023)
Oliveira, G., Godinot, N., Sanchez, E., Bonnat, C., Morard, S., Dall’Aglio, S.: Game Design for a Museum Visit: Insights into the Co-design of AL2049, a Game About Food Systems, pp. 22–31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22124-8_3
Grenier, R.S.: All work and no play makes for a dull museum visitor. New Direct. Adult Continuing Educ. 2010(127), 77–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.383
Ericksen, P.J.: Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Glob. Environ. Chang. 18(1), 234–245 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002
Sanchez, E., Plumettaz-Sieber, M.: Teaching and learning with escape games from debriefing to institutionalization of knowledge. In: 7th International Conference, GALA 2018, Palermo, Italy, 5–7 Dec 2018, Proceedings, pp. 242–253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_23
Fernández Galeote, D., Diamant, M., Volkovs, K., Zeko, C., Thibault, M., Legaki, N.-Z., Hamari, J.: Understanding the game-based learning experience: a framework of frictions between design and play. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 1–4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3555858.3555933
Blythe, M., Hassenzahl, M.: The semantics of fun: differentiating enjoyable experiences. In: Blythe, M. A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 91–100. Springer, Netherlands (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_9
Ermi, L., Mäyrä, F.: Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: analysing immersion. In: DiGRA Conference (2005)
Mäyrä, F., Ermi, L.: Fundamental Components of the Gameplay Experience (2011)
Abdul Jabbar, A.I., Felicia, P.: Gameplay engagement and learning in game-based learning: a systematic review. Rev. Educ. Res. 85(4), 740–779 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315577210
Genvo, S.: Caractériser l’expérience du jeu à son ère numérique: Pour une étude du “play design”. Le Jeu Vidéo : Expériences et Pratiques Sociales Multidimensionnelles (2008). https://hal-unilim.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00653194
Genvo, S.: Penser les phénomènes de ludicisation à partir de Jacques Henriot. Sciences Du Jeu, 1 (2013)
Drachen, A., El-Nasr, M.S., Canossa, A.: Game analytics – the basics: maximizing the value of player data. Game Anal., 13–40 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4769-5_2
Nacke, L.E., Bateman, C., Mandryk, R.L.: BrainHex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey. Entertainment Comput. 5(1), 55–62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2013.06.002
Wiemeyer, J., Nacke, L., Moser, C., ‘Floyd’ Mueller, F.: (2016). Player experience. In: Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.) Serious Games: Foundations, Concepts and Practice (pp. 243–271). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40612-1_9
Arnab, S., et al.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 46(2), 391–411 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113
Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M.: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 661–686 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
Abeele, V.V., Spiel, K., Nacke, L., Johnson, D., Gerling, K.: Development and validation of the player experience inventory: a scale to measure player experiences at the level of functional and psychosocial consequences. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 135, 102370 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102370
Desurvire, H., Wiberg, C.: Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: the next iteration. In Ozok, A.A., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) Online Communities and Social Computing, pp. 557–566). Springer (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_60
Korhonen, H., Koivisto, E.M.I.: Playability heuristics for mobile games. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 9–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152218
Seif El-Nasr, M., Drachen, A., Canossa, A. (eds.): Game Analytics: Maximizing the Value of Player Data. Springer (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4769-5
Medlock, M., Wixon, D.R., Terrano, M., Romero, R.L.: Using the RITE method to improve products; a definition and a case study (2007). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-the-RITE-method-to-improve-products%3B-a-and-a-Medlock-Wixon/5340ef8a91900840263a4036b0433a389b7097b2
Bauckhage, C., Drachen, A., Sifa, R.: Clustering game behavior data. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 7(3), 266–278 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2014.2376982
Drachen, A., Canossa, A.: Towards gameplay analysis via gameplay metrics. In: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era, pp. 202–209 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621878
Brockmyer, J.H., Fox, C.M., Curtiss, K.A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K.M., Pidruzny, J.N.: The development of the game engagement questionnaire: a measure of engagement in video game-playing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45(4), 624–634 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.016
Cheng, M.-T., She, H.-C., Annetta, L.A.: Game immersion experience: its hierarchical structure and impact on game-based science learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 31(3), 232–253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12066
Poels, K., de Kort, Y., Ijsselsteijn, W.: “It is always a lot of fun!”: Exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play, pp. 83–89 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328218
Johnson, D., Gardner, M.J., Perry, R.: Validation of two game experience scales: the player experience of need satisfaction (PENS) and game experience questionnaire (GEQ). Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 118, 38–46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.05.003
Law, E.L.-C., Brühlmann, F., Mekler, E.D.: Systematic review and validation of the game experience questionnaire (GEQ)—implications for citation and reporting practice. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 257–270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242683
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(2), 112–133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Fielding, N.G.: Triangulation and mixed methods designs: data integration with new research technologies. J. Mixed Methods Res. 6(2), 124–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101
Kara, N.: A mixed-methods study of cultural heritage learning through playing a serious game. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 40(6), 1397–1408 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2125627
Rubino, I., Barberis, C., Xhembulla, J., Malnati, G.: Integrating a location-based mobile game in the museum visit: evaluating visitors’ behaviour and learning. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 8(3), 15:1–15:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724723
Carvalho, M.B., et al.: An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Comput. Educ. 87, 166–181 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.023
Aranguren, R.V., Rodriguez, P.P., Vela, F.L.G., Arango-López, J.: Model for pervasive social play experiences. In Agredo-Delgado, V., Ruiz, P.H., Villalba-Condori, K.O. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 171–180. Springer International Publishing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66919-5_18
Annetta, L.A.: The “I’s” have it: a framework for serious educational game design. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14(2), 105–113 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018985
Rooney, P.: A theoretical framework for serious game design: exploring pedagogy, play and fidelity and their implications for the design process. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. (IJGBL) 2(4), 41–60 (2012)
Madsen, K.M.: The gamified museum: a critical literature review and discussion of gamification in museums. In: Gamescope: The Potential for Gamification in Digital and Analogue Places (2020). https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/the-gamified-museum-a-critical-literature-review-and-discussion-o
Nicholson, S.: Strategies for Meaningful Gamification: Concepts behind Transformative Play and Participatory Museums (2012)
Hunicke, R., Leblanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: a formal approach to game design and game research. In: AAAI Workshop—Technical Report, 1 (2004)
Ribbens, W., Poels, Y.: Researching player experiences through the use of different qualitative methods. In: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory—Proceedings of DiGRA 2009 (2009)
Koivisto, J., Hamari, J.: The rise of motivational information systems: a review of gamification research. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 45, 191–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013
Pereira de Aguiar, M., Winn, B., Cezarotto, M., Battaiola, A.L., Varella Gomes, P.: Educational Digital Games: A Theoretical Framework About Design Models, Learning Theories and User Experience (Marcus, A., Wang, W. eds.), vol. 10918, pp. 165–184. Springer International Publishing (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_13
Shaffer, D.W., Gee, J.P.: Shaffer D. W.: Before every child is left behind: how epistemic games can solve the coming crisis in education. WCER Working Paper No. 2005-7. http://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED497010
Hofer, B.K., Pintrich, P.R.: The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 67(1), 88–140 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/1170620
Suovuo, T., Skult, N., Joelsson, T., Skult, P., Ravyse, W., Smed, J.: The Game Experience Model (GEM), pp. 183–205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37643-7_8
Smed, J., Hakonen, H.: Algorithms and Networking for Computer Games, 2nd edn. Wiley (2017)
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.: Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learn. Instr. 29, 153–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
Pekrun, R., Stephens, E.J.: Academic emotions. In: APA Educational Psychology Handbook, Vol 2: Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors, pp. 3–31. American Psychological Association (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-001
Marshall, M., Brown, J.: Emotional reactions to achievement outcomes: is it really best to expect the worst? Cogn. Emot. 20(1), 43–63 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500215116
Paukovics, E., Morard, S., Rioja, K., Sanchez, E.: Clustering Player Behaviors to Reveal Complexity Exploration Patterns in an Educational Museum Game, submitted for publication
Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., Moules, N.J.: Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods 16(1), 1609406917733847 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Swiss National Sciences Foundation (SNSF 100019_185474), as well as a close partnership with teachers from compulsory schools, the game design studio Digital Kingdom.
Disclosure of Interests.
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Morard, S., Paukovics, E., Sanchez, E. (2025). Understanding Player Experience in Museum-Based Learning Games: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. In: Plass, J.L., Ochoa, X. (eds) Serious Games. JCSG 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74138-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74138-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-74137-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-74138-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)