Skip to main content

From Brain Tissue Infarction at 24 Hours to Patient Functional Outcome at 90 Days Using Deep Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries (BrainLes 2023, SWITCH 2023)

Abstract

Accurate functional outcome prediction shortly after the onset of stroke would enable more effective personalized care of stroke patients. A deep learning approach was developed that utilizes follow-up images at 24 h to predict the functional outcome 90 days after stroke onset. The method involves the use of a conventional U-net segmentation model that was trained to delineate the stroke lesion on CT images, with an additional branch integrated into the U-net’s bottom layer to extract features for a separately trained network that classifies cases into favorable (modified Rankin Score (mRS) = 0–2) or unfavorable outcomes (mRS = 3–6). The method was trained and validated using 3-fold cross-validation on a set of 240 images (training: 170; validation: 90). The lesion segmentation yielded an average Dice score of 0.458 and an average absolute volume error of 10.71 ml, while the binary mRS prediction obtained an overall accuracy of 88.6% on the training set and 58.0% on the validation set. Although there is much room for improvement, these results demonstrate the potential of deep learning approaches toward a promising decision-support tool for stroke outcome prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stroke. Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/stroke/symptoms-causes/syc-20350113, last checked on 12 May 2023, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/stroke/symptoms-causes/syc-20350113

  2. Bacchi, S., Zerner, T., Oakden-Rayner, L., Kleinig, T., Patel, S., Jannes, J.: Deep learning in the prediction of ischaemic stroke thrombolysis functional outcomes: a pilot study. Acad. Radiol. 27, e19–e23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.015

  3. Banks, J.L., Marotta, C.A.: Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials - a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 38, 1091–1096 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6

  4. Bertels, J., Robben, D., Lemmens, R., Vandermeulen, D.: DeepVoxNet2: yet another CNN framework, November 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09569

  5. Choi, Y., Kwon, Y., Lee, H., Kim, B.J., Paik, M.C., Won, J.H.: Ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks for prognosis of ischemic stroke, pp. 231–243 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, L., Liu, Z., Mane, R., Wang, S., Jing, J., et al., H.F.: Predicting functional outcome in patients with acute brainstem infarction using deep neuroimaging features. Eur. J. Neurol. 29, 744–752 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15181

  7. Feigin, V.L., Brainin, M., Norrving, B., Martins, S., Sacco, R.L., et al., W.H.: World stroke organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022, November 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211065917

  8. Goyal, M., Ospel, J.M., Kappelhof, M., Ganesh, A.: Challenges of outcome prediction for acute stroke treatment decisions. Stroke 1921–1928 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033785

  9. Heylen, E., Vandermeulen, D., Maes, F., Dupont, P., Scheldeman, L., Lambert, J., Bertels, J.: Modelling the evolution of brain tissue status in ischemic stroke using CNNs. Master thesis, KU Leuven (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karolinska University Hospital. https://www.karolinska.se/en/karolinska-university-hospital/

  11. Lin, C.H., Hsu, K.C., Johnson, K.R., Fann, Y.C., Tsai, C.H., et al., Y.S.: Evaluation of machine learning methods to stroke outcome prediction using a nationwide disease registry. Comput. Methods Program. Biomed. 190 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105381

  12. Nielsen, A., Hansen, M.B., Tietze, A., Mouridsen, K.: Prediction of tissue outcome and assessment of treatment effect in acute ischemic stroke using deep learning. Stroke 49, 1394–1401 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishi, H., et al.: Deep learning-derived high-level neuroimaging features predict clinical outcomes for large vessel occlusion. Stroke 1484–1492 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028101

  14. Omarov, B., et al.: Modified unet model for brain stroke lesion segmentation on computed tomography images. Comput. Mater. Continua 71, 4701–4717 (2022). https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.020998

  15. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, pp. 234–241 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, Y., Huang, W., Dong, P., Xia, Y., Wang, S.: D-unet: a dimension-fusion u shape network for chronic stroke lesion segmentation, August 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2019.2939522, http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.05104

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to express our sincere gratitude to Fredrik Ståhl and Åke Holmberg for providing the KAROLINSKA dataset, which has been instrumental in facilitating our research endeavors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Ulens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ulens, M. et al. (2024). From Brain Tissue Infarction at 24 Hours to Patient Functional Outcome at 90 Days Using Deep Learning. In: Baid, U., et al. Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries. BrainLes SWITCH 2023 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14668. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76160-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76160-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-76159-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-76160-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics