Skip to main content

Robots and Social Sustainability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
European Robotics Forum 2024 (ERF 2024)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics ((SPAR,volume 32))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainability is no longer a matter of choice but is invariably linked to the survival of the entire ecosystem of our planet Earth. As robotics technology is growing at an exponential rate, it is crucial to examine its implications for sustainability. Our focus is on social sustainability, specifically analyzing the role of robotics technology in this domain by identifying six distinct ways robots influence social sustainability.

This research was supported in part by the National Science Centre, Poland, under the OPUS call in the Weave programme under the project number 2021/43/I/ST6/02489.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali, S., Moroso, T., Breazeal, C.: Can children learn creativity from a social robot? In: Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 359–368 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arcand, M., Nantel, J., Arles-Dufour, M., Vincent, A.: The impact of reading a web site’s privacy statement on perceived control over privacy and perceived trust. Online Inf. Rev. 31(5), 661–681 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbareschi, G., et al.: I am both here and there parallel control of multiple robotic avatars by disabled workers in a café. Association for Computing Machinery (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bashir, H.: Leveraging technology to communicate sustainability-related product information: evidence from the field. J. Clean. Prod. 362, 132508 (2022)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC): My Special Partner (n.d.). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/golden_years/4373857.stm. Accessed 16 Dec 2024

  6. Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G.J., Jonker, P., de Witte, L.: Effectiveness of robot Paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: a multicenter quasi-experimental study. J. Am. Med. Directors Assoc. 16(11), 946–950 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Birks, M., Bodak, M., Barlas, J., Harwood, J., Pether, M.: Robotic seals as therapeutic tools in an aged care facility: a qualitative study. J. Aging Res. 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boot, G.: Lifelike and cheap sex robots made with 3d printers will fuel surge in addiction. The Sun (2018). https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/7998023/lifelike-and-cheap-sex-robots-made-with-3d-printers-will-fuel-surge-in-addiction/. Accessed 29 Mar 2023

  9. Calo, C.J., Hunt-Bull, N., Lewis, L., Metzler, T.: Ethical implications of using the Paro robot, with a focus on dementia patient care. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cervantes, J.A., López, S., Cervantes, S., Hernández, A., Duarte, H.: Social robots and brain-computer interface video games for dealing with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 13(8), 1172 (2023)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Choo, L., Kaplan, T.R., Zultan, R.: Manipulation and (Mis)trust in prediction markets. Manag. Sci. 68(9), 6716–6732 (2022)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper, S., Ros, R., Lemaignan, S.: Challenges of deploying assistive robots in real-life scenarios: an industrial perspective. In: 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deshmukh, A., Darda, K.M., Mhatre, M.M., Pandey, R., Jadhav, A.R., Cross, E.: Enhancing hand hygiene practices through a social robot-assisted intervention in a rural school in India. In: Proceedings of the ICSR 2023, pp. 244–253. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deutsch, I., Erel, H., Paz, M., Hoffman, G., Zuckerman, O.: Home robotic devices for older adults: opportunities and concerns. Comput. Hum. Behav. 98, 122–133 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dias, M., Mills-Tettey, G., Nanayakkara, T.: Robotics, education, and sustainable development. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4248–4253 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dimant, E., van Kleef, G.A., Shalvi, S.: Requiem for a nudge: framing effects in nudging honesty. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 172, 247–266 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Druckman, D., et al.: Who is best at mediating a social conflict? Comparing robots, screens and humans. Group Decis. Negot. 30, 395–426 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engelen, B.: Ethical criteria for health-promoting nudges: a case-by-case analysis. Am. J. Bioethics 19(5), 48–59 (2019), pMID: 31068115

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eskander, R., Tewari, K., Osann, K., Shibata, T.: Pilot study of the paro therapeutic robot demonstrates decreased pain, fatigue, and anxiety among patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 130(1), e144–e145 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. European Robotics Forum: Social robots: Applications and sustainability priorities (2023). https://erf2023.sdu.dk/timetable/event/social-robots-applications-and-sustainability-priorities/. Accessed 12 Sep 2023

  21. Ferreira, F., Miškovic, N.: Addressing the sustainability of the adriatic sea using marine robotics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE IROS 2021 Workshop on Role Robot. Achieving UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, p. 2 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42(3–4), 143–166 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, C.: Ethical concerns with replacing human relations with humanoid robots: an ubuntu perspective. AI Ethics 3, 527–538 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. González-González, C.S., Gil-Iranzo, R.M., Paderewski-Rodríguez, P.: Human-robot interaction and sexbots: a systematic literature review. Sensors 21(1) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goodland, R.: Encycl. Glob. Environ. Change 5, chap. Sustainability: Human, Social, Economic and Environmental, pp. 481–491. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ (USA) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Halpern, D.: Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes can Make a Big Difference. WH Allen, London, UK (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hung, L., et al.: The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot paro in care settings: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 19, 1–10 (2019)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Indurkhya, B.: Ethical aspects of faking emotions in chatbots and social robots. In: 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  29. IROS Workshop: Sustainable robotics (2021). https://www.sustainablerobotics.org/iros-2021-workshop-summary/. Accessed 12 Sep 2023

  30. Kachmar, O., Kozyavkin, V., Ablikova, I.: Humanoid social robots in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. In: REHAB 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kang, H.S., Makimoto, K., Konno, R., Koh, I.S.: Review of outcome measures in paro robot intervention studies for dementia care. Geri. Nurs. 41(3), 207–214 (2020)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Kasperbauer, T.J.: The permissibility of nudging for sustainable energy consumption. Energy Policy 111, 52–57 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kory-Westlund, J.M., Breazeal, C.: Assessing children’s perceptions and acceptance of a social robot. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 38–50 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kuribayashi, M., et al..: Pathfinder: designing a map-less navigation system for blind people in unfamiliar buildings. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lehdonvirta, V., Shi, L.P., Hertog, E., Nagase, N., Ohta, Y.: The future (s) of unpaid work: How susceptible do experts from different backgrounds think the domestic sphere is to automation? PLoS ONE 18(2), e0281282 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lehner, M., Mont, O., Heiskanen, E.: Nudging-a promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? J. Clean. Prod. 134, 166–177 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Li, H., John-John, C., Tan, Y.K.: Towards an effective design of social robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3(4), 333–335 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Li, Y., et al.: I want to be unique from other robots: positioning girls as co-creators of social robots in culturally-responsive computing education. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, S.X., Shen, Q., Hancock, J.: Can a social robot be too warm or too competent? Older Chinese adults’ perceptions of social robots and vulnerabilities. Comput. Hum. Behav. 125, 106942 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. GGossen, M., Jager, S., Hoffmann, M. L., Bießmann, F., Korenke, R., Santarius, T.: Nudging sustainable consumption: A large-scale data analysis of sustainability labels for fashion in German online retail. Front. Sustain. 3, 922984 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mai, V., et al.: The role of robotics in achieving the united nations sustainable development goals-the experts’ meeting at the 2021 IEEE/RSJ IROS workshop [industry activities]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 29(1), 92–107 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Martí Carrillo, F., et al.: Adapting a general-purpose social robot for paediatric rehabilitation through in situ design. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. (THRI) 7(1), 1–30 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Masterson, A.M.: Designing a loving robot: a social construction analysis of a sex robot creator’s vision. Hum.-Mach. Commun. 5, 99–114 (2022)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Matsumura, N., Fruchter, R., Leifer, L.: Shikakeology: designing triggers for behavior change. AI Soc. 30, 419–429 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moerman, C.J., Van Der Heide, L., Heerink, M.: Social robots to support children’s well-being under medical treatment: a systematic state-of-the-art review. J. Child Health Care 23(4), 596–612 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Moyle, W., Bramble, M., Jones, C., Murfield, J.: Care staff perceptions of a social robot called paro and a look-alike plush toy: a descriptive qualitative approach. Aging Mental health 22(3), 330–335 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nash, K., Lea, J.M., Davies, T., Yogeeswaran, K.: The bionic blues: robot rejection lowers self-esteem. Comput. Hum. Behav. 78, 59–63 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Park, I.W., Han, J.: Teachers’ views on the use of robots and cloud services in education for sustainable development. Clust. Comput. 19, 987–999 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Pennisi, P., et al.: Autism and social robotics: a systematic review. Autism Res. 9(2), 165–183 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Possati, L.M.: Psychoanalyzing artificial intelligence: the case of replika. AI Soc. 1–14 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Prochaska, J.J., et al.: A therapeutic relational agent for reducing problematic substance use (woebot): Development and usability study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23(3) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pu, L., Moyle, W., Jones, C.: How people with dementia perceive a therapeutic robot called paro in relation to their pain and mood: a qualitative study. J. Clin. Nurs. 29(3–4), 437–446 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pu, L., Moyle, W., Jones, C., Todorovic, M.: The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist 59(1), e37–e51 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rasouli, S., Gupta, G., Nilsen, E., Dautenhahn, K.: Potential applications of social robots in robot-assisted interventions for social anxiety. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 14(5), 1–32 (2022)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Romain Maure, B.B.: Participatory design of a social robot and robot-mediated storytelling activity to raise awareness of gender inequality among children. In: 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sanoubari, E., Young, J., Houston, A., Dautenhahn, K.: Can robots be bullied? A crowdsourced feasibility study for using social robots in anti-bullying interventions. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 931–938. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sasidharan, S., Pasupuleti, D., Das, A.M., Kapoor, C., Manikutty, G., Rao, R.: Haksh-E: an autonomous social robot for promoting good hand hygiene among children. In: IROS 2021 Workshop on The Roles of Robotics in Achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., Matarić, M.: Robots for use in autism research. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 275–294 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Schmidt, A.T., Engelen, B.: The ethics of nudging: an overview. Philos Compass 15(4), e12658 (2020)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf. Technol. 14(1), 27–40 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Shew, A.: Against Technoableism: Rethinking Who Needs Improvement. W.W. Norton, New York, NY, USA (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Simkulet, W.: Informed consent and nudging. Bioethics 33(1), 169–184 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Spisak, S.E., Indurkhya, B.: A study on social exclusion in human-robot interaction. Electronics 12(7) (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sunstein, C.R., Reisch, L.A.: Trusting Nudges: Toward A Bill of Rights for Nudging. Routledge, Abingdon, UK (2019)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Sætra, H.S.: Loving robots changing love: towards a practical deficiency-love. J. Futur. Robot Life 109–127 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Torras, C.: The Vestigial Heart. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tussyadiah, I., Miller, G.: Nudged by a robot: responses to agency and feedback. Ann. Tour. Res. 78, 102752 (2019)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Vanderborght, B., et al.: Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interact. Stud. 13(3), 348–372 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vaussard, F., et al.: Lessons learned from robotic vacuum cleaners entering the home ecosystem. Robot. Auton. Syst. 62(3), 376–391 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Vella, K.: Pick me up before you go-go: sociotechnical strategies for waste in music festival campsites. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Weisswange, T.H., et al.: What could a social mediator robot do? Lessons from real-world mediation scenarios (2023). Accessed 14 Sep 2023

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wendel, S.: Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Xie, T., Pentina, I.: Attachment theory as a framework to understand relationships with social chatbots: a case study of replika (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Yang, W., Luo, H., Su, J.: Towards inclusiveness and sustainability of robot programming in early childhood: child engagement, learning outcomes and teacher perception. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 53(6), 1486–1510 (2022)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bipin Indurkhya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Indurkhya, B., Sienkiewicz, B. (2024). Robots and Social Sustainability. In: Secchi, C., Marconi, L. (eds) European Robotics Forum 2024. ERF 2024. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76424-0_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics