Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Labeled Dataset for Sentiment Analysis of Videos on YouTube, TikTok, and Other Sources About the 2024 Outbreak of Measles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 15375))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

Since the beginning of 2024, several countries have been experiencing an outbreak of measles. In the modern-day Internet of Everything lifestyle, social media platforms such as YouTube and TikTok have gained widespread popularity on a global scale due to their ability to facilitate the easy creation and dissemination of videos. During virus outbreaks of the recent past, videos on social media platforms played a crucial role in keeping the global population informed and updated regarding various aspects of the outbreaks. As a result in the last few years, researchers from different disciplines have focused on the development of datasets of videos published on YouTube, TikTok, and similar websites. No prior work in this field has focused on the development of a dataset of videos about the ongoing outbreak of measles, published on social media platforms. The work of this paper aims to address this research gap and presents a dataset that contains the data of 4011 videos about the ongoing outbreak of measles published on 264 websites on the internet between January 1, 2024, and May 31, 2024, available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/40s8-xf63. These websites primarily include YouTube and TikTok, which account for 48.6% and 15.2% of the videos, respectively. The remainder of the websites include Instagram and Facebook as well as the websites of various global and local news organizations. For each of these videos, the URL of the video, title of the post, description of the post, and the date of publication of the video are presented as separate attributes in the dataset. After developing this dataset, sentiment analysis (using VADER), subjectivity analysis (using TextBlob), and fine-grain sentiment analysis (using DistilRoBERTa-base) of the video titles and video descriptions were performed. This included classifying each video title and video description into (i) one of the sentiment classes i.e. positive, negative, or neutral, (ii) one of the subjectivity classes i.e. highly opinionated, neutral opinionated, or least opinionated, and (iii) one of the fine-grain sentiment classes i.e. fear, surprise, joy, sadness, anger, disgust, or neutral. These results are presented as separate attributes in the dataset for the training and testing of machine learning algorithms for performing sentiment analysis or subjectivity analysis in this field as well as for other applications. Finally, this paper also presents a list of open research questions that may be investigated using this dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bester, J.C.: Measles and measles vaccination: a review. JAMA Pediatr. 170, 1209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Measles — United States, January 4–April 2 (2015). https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6414a1.htm. Accessed 29 Mar 2024

  3. Gastañaduy, P.A., Goodson, J.L., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Rota, P.A., Orenstein, W.A., Patel, M.: Measles in the 21st century: progress toward achieving and sustaining elimination. J. Infect. Dis. 224, S420–S428 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Durrheim, D.N., Andrus, J.K., Tabassum, S., Bashour, H., Githanga, D., Pfaff, G.: A dangerous measles future looms beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Med. 27, 360–361 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01237-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soodejani, M.T., Basti, M., Tabatabaei, S.M., Rajabkhah, K.: Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and COVID-19: a systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Gen. 12, 35 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. CDCGlobal: Global measles outbreaks. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/measles/data/global-measles-outbreaks.html. Accessed 29 Mar 2024

  7. Ouyang, S., Li, C., Li, X.: A peek into the future: Predicting the popularity of online videos. IEEE Access. 4, 3026–3033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2580911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weekly time spent with online video worldwide 2018–2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/611707/online-video-time-spent/. Accessed 29 Mar 2024

  9. Rosenthal, S.: Media literacy, scientific literacy, and science videos on the Internet. Front. Commun. 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.581585

  10. Elgedawy, R., et al.: Security advice for parents and children about content filtering and circumvention as found on YouTube and TikTok (2024). http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03255

  11. Cuesta-Valiño, P., Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, P., Durán-Álamo, P.: Why do people return to video platforms? millennials and centennials on TikTok. Media Commun. 10, 198–207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4737

  12. Mohsin, M.: 10 YouTube statistics that you need to know in 2023. https://www.oberlo.com/blog/youtube-statistics. Accessed 01 May 2024

  13. Top websites in the World - March 2024 most visited & popular rankings. https://www.semrush.com/website/top/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  14. Blogger, G.M.I.: Youtube statistics 2024 (demographics, users by country & more). https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/youtube-users-statistics/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  15. YouTube app user engagement in selected markets 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1287283/time-spent-youtube-app-selected-countries/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  16. Biggest social media platforms 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  17. TikTok users worldwide 2027. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1142687/tiktok-users-worldwide. Accessed 01 May 2024

  18. Most downloaded apps worldwide 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1448008/top-downloaded-mobile-apps-worldwide/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  19. Duarte, F.: Average time spent on TikTok statistics (2024). https://explodingtopics.com/blog/time-spent-on-tiktok. Accessed 01 May 2024

  20. Lin, Y.: TikTok users by country. https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/tiktok-users-by-country. Accessed 01 May 2024

  21. de Guzman, A.B., Mesana, J.C.B., Manuel, M.E., Arcega, K.C.A., Yumang, R.L.T., Miranda, K.N.V.: Examining intergenerational family members’ creative activities during COVID-19 lockdown via manifest content analysis of YouTube and TikTok videos. Educ. Gerontol. 48, 458–471 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2046372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Comeau, N., Abdelnour, A., Ashack, K.: Assessing public interest in Mpox via Google trends, YouTube, and TikTok. JMIR Dermatol. 6, e48827 (2023). https://doi.org/10.2196/48827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/measles-outbreak-american-samoa-declared-public-health-emergency/story?id=98826831. Accessed 01 May 2024

  24. Romania declares measles epidemic as infant dies in hospital. https://www.vaccinestoday.eu/stories/romania-declares-measles-epidemic-as-infant-dies-in-hospital/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  25. Prater, E.: Measles cases are mounting in the US as the UK declares a ‘national incident’ over the disease. What parents need to know to keep their kids safe. https://fortune.com/well/2024/01/27/measles-cases-rise-us-uk-world-symptoms-vaccine-hesitancy-covid-pandemic/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  26. Real, E., Shlens, J., Mazzocchi, S., Pan, X., Vanhoucke, V.: YouTube-BoundingBoxes: a large high-precision human-annotated data set for object detection in video. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Loh, F., Wamser, F., Poignée, F., Geißler, S., Hoßfeld, T.: YouTube dataset on mobile streaming for Internet traffic modeling and streaming analysis. Sci. Data. 9, 1–12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01418-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu, N., et al.: YouTube-VOS: sequence-to-sequence video object segmentation. In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., Weiss, Y. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2018. ECCV 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol. 11209. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01228-1_36

  29. Li, F., Kim, T., Humayun, A., Tsai, D., Rehg, J.M.: Video segmentation by tracking many figure-ground segments. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jain, S.D., Grauman, K.: Supervoxel-consistent foreground propagation in video. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8692. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10593-2_43

  31. Ochs, P., Malik, J., Brox, T.: Segmentation of moving objects by long-term video analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 36, 1187–1200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2013.242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perazzi, F., Pont-Tuset, J., McWilliams, B., Van Gool, L., Gross, M., Sorkine-Hornung, A.: A benchmark dataset and evaluation methodology for video object segmentation. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pont-Tuset, J., Perazzi, F., Caelles, S., Arbeláez, P., Sorkine-Hornung, A., Van Gool, L.: The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.00675

  34. Lall, S., Agarwal, M., Sivakumar, R.: A YouTube dataset with user-level usage data: baseline characteristics and key insights. In: ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Le, T., Nguyen-Thi, M.-V., Le, H., Vo, Q.-T., Le, T., Nguyen, H.T.: EnTube: A Dataset for YouTube Video Engagement Analytics (2022). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2085784/v1

  36. Qian, Y., Sun, Y.: Tik Tok Actions: A Tik Tok-Derived Video Dataset for Human Action Recognition. http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08875. Accessed 01 May 2024

  37. Ng, L.H.X., Tan, J.Y.H., Tan, D.J.H., Lee, R.K.-W.: Will you dance to the challenge?: predicting user participation of TikTok challenges. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ACM, New York (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Basch, C.H., Yalamanchili, B., Fera, J.: #climate change on TikTok: a content analysis of videos. J. Commun. Health 47, 163–167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-021-01031-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fiallos, A., Fiallos, C., Figueroa, S.: Tiktok and education: Discovering knowledge through learning videos. In: 2021 Eighth International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment (ICEDEG), pp. 172–176. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shutsko, A.: User-generated short video content in social media: a case study of TikTok. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds.) Social Computing and Social Media. Participation, User Experience, Consumer Experience, and Applications of Social Computing. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol. 12195. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49576-3_8

  41. Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Mahafzah, A., Hallit, R.R.: TikTok content on measles-rubella vaccine in Jordan: a cross-sectional study highlighting the spread of vaccine misinformation. JMIR Preprints (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hussain, A., Ali, S., Ahmed, M., Hussain, S.: The anti-vaccination movement: a regression in modern medicine. Cureus (2018). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yiannakoulias, N., Slavik, C.E., Chase, M.: Expressions of pro - and anti-vaccine sentiment on YouTube. Vaccine 37, 2057–2064 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. YouTube data API. https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3. Accessed 07 Jun 2024

  45. getcartermusic: No baby at all by THE MEASLES [music video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr1H5j56kv4. Accessed 07 Jun 2024

  46. Hutto, C., Gilbert, E.: VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 8, pp. 216–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550

  47. TextBlob: Simplified Text Processing — TextBlob 0.18.0.post0 documentation. https://textblob.readthedocs.io/. Accessed 01 May 2024

  48. J-hartmann/emotion-english-distilroberta-base · hugging face. https://huggingface.co/j-hartmann/emotion-english-distilroberta-base. Accessed 01 May 2024

  49. Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Vyas, V., Uma, V.: Approaches to sentiment analysis on product reviews. In: Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics, pp. 15–30. IGI Global, Hershey (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ribeiro, F.N., Araújo, M., Gonçalves, P., André Gonçalves, M., Benevenuto, F.: SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Sci. 5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1

  52. Islam, M.R., Zibran, M.F.: A comparison of dictionary building methods for sentiment analysis in software engineering text. In: 2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pp. 478–479. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nguyen, H., Veluchamy, A., Diop, M., Iqbal, R.: Comparative study of sentiment analysis with product reviews using machine learning and lexicon-based approaches. SMU Data Sci. Rev. 1, 7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saha, S., Showrov, M.I.H., Rahman, M.M., Majumder, M.Z.H.: VADER vs. BERT: a comparative performance analysis for sentiment on coronavirus outbreak. In: Satu, M.S., Moni, M.A., Kaiser, M.S., Arefin, M.S. (eds.) Machine Intelligence and Emerging Technologies. MIET 2022. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol. 490. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34619-4_30

  55. Borrelli, F.M., Challiol, C.: Comparing and evaluating tools for sentiment analysis. In: XI Jornadas de Cloud Computing, Big Data and Emerging Topics (La Plata, 27 al 29 de junio de 2023) (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Thakur, N., Han, C.: An exploratory study of tweets about the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: insights from sentiment analysis, language interpretation, source tracking, type classification, and embedded URL detection. COVID 2, 1026–1049 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/covid2080076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Thakur, N.: Sentiment analysis and text analysis of the public discourse on Twitter about COVID-19 and MPox. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 7, 116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Anoop, V.S., Sreelakshmi, S.: Public discourse and sentiment during Mpox outbreak: an analysis using natural language processing. Publ. Health 218, 114–120 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bengesi, S., Oladunni, T., Olusegun, R., Audu, H.: A machine learning-sentiment analysis on Monkeypox outbreak: an extensive dataset to show the polarity of public opinion from Twitter tweets. IEEE Access. 11, 11811–11826 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3242290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Thakur, N.: MonkeyPox2022Tweets: a large-scale Twitter dataset on the 2022 Monkeypox outbreak, findings from analysis of Tweets, and open research questions. Infect. Dis. Rep. 14, 855–883 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/idr14060087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Butt, S., Sharma, S., Sharma, R., Sidorov, G., Gelbukh, A.: What goes on inside rumour and non-rumour tweets and their reactions: a psycholinguistic analyses. Comput. Human Behav. 135, 107345 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kuang, Z., Zong, S., Zhang, J., Chen, J., Liu, H.: Music-to-text synaesthesia: generating descriptive text from music recordings (2022). http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00434

  63. Rozado, D., Hughes, R., Halberstadt, J.: Longitudinal analysis of sentiment and emotion in news media headlines using automated labelling with transformer language models. PLoS ONE 17, e0276367 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Melton, C.A., Olusanya, O.A., Ammar, N., Shaban-Nejad, A.: Public sentiment analysis and topic modeling regarding COVID-19 vaccines on the Reddit social media platform: a call to action for strengthening vaccine confidence. J. Infect. Public Health 14, 1505–1512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Melton, C.A.: Mining public opinion on COVID-19 vaccines using unstructured social media data (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data. 3, 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

  67. Kaushik, L., Sangwan, A., Hansen, J.H.L.: Automatic sentiment extraction from YouTube videos. In: 2013 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Oksanen, A., et al.: Pro-anorexia and anti-pro-anorexia videos on YouTube: sentiment analysis of user responses. J. Med. Internet Res. 17, e256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Isnan, M., Elwirehardja, G.N., Pardamean, B.: Sentiment analysis for TikTok review using VADER sentiment and SVM model. Proc. Comput. Sci. 227, 168–175 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Southwick, L., Guntuku, S.C., Klinger, E.V., Seltzer, E., McCalpin, H.J., Mer-chant, R.M.: Characterizing COVID-19 content posted to TikTok: public sentiment and response during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Adolesc. Health. 69, 234–241 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Heyder, C., Hillebrandt, I.: Short vertical videos going viral on TikTok: an empirical study and sentiment analysis. In: Redler, J., Schmidt, H.J., Baumgarth, C. (eds.) Forum Markenforschung 2021. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39568-1_7

  72. Shevtsov, A., Oikonomidou, M., Antonakaki, D.: Analysis of Twitter and YouTube during USelections 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08183. https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn

  73. Thakur, N., Cui, S., Knieling, V., Khanna, K., Shao, M.: Investigation of the misinformation about COVID-19 on YouTube using topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and language analysis. Computation (Basel) 12, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/computation12020028

  74. Porreca, A., Scozzari, F., Di Nicola, M.: Using text mining and sentiment analysis to analyse YouTube Italian videos concerning vaccination. BMC Publ. Health. 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8342-4

  75. Rachmawati, F., Wibowo, A.A., Arianto, I.D.: Sentiment analysis #samasamabelajar public relations campaign based on big data on Tik-Tok. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Economics and Business, vol. 1, pp. 377–388

    Google Scholar 

  76. Da’u, A., Salim, N.: Recommendation system based on deep learning methods: a systematic review and new directions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53, 2709–2748 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09744-1

  77. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schein, A.I., Popescul, A., Ungar, L.H., Pennock, D.M.: Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ma, H., Zhou, T.C., Lyu, M.R., King, I.: Improving recommender systems by incorporating social contextual information. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 29, 1–23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1961209.1961212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Li, Y., Wang, H., Liu, H., Chen, B.: A study on content-based video recommendation. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Nanli, Z., Ping, Z., Weiguo, L., Meng, C.: Sentiment analysis: a literature review. In: 2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT). IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Medhat, W., Hassan, A., Korashy, H.: Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: a survey. Ain Shams Eng. J. 5, 1093–1113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wankhade, M., Rao, A.C.S., Kulkarni, C.: A survey on sentiment analysis methods, applications, and challenges. Artif. Intell. Rev. 55, 5731–5780 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Birjali, M., Kasri, M., Beni-Hssane, A.: A comprehensive survey on sentiment analysis: approaches, challenges, and trends. Knowl. Based Syst. 226, 107134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Singh, N.K., Tomar, D.S., Sangaiah, A.K.: Sentiment analysis: a review and comparative analysis over social media. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11, 97–117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0862-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Hussein, D.M.E.-D.M.: A survey on sentiment analysis challenges. J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci. 30, 330–338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2016.04.002

  87. Zhang, L., Tong, Y., Ji, Q.: Active image labeling and its application to facial action labeling. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2008. ECCV 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5303. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88688-4_52

  88. Woods, D.D.: Behind Human Error. Ashgate Publishing, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Nirmalya Thakur, Mingchen Shao & Hongseok Jeong

  2. Department of Mathematics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Vanessa Su & Kesha A. Patel

  3. Program in Linguistics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Victoria Knieling

  4. Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Andrew Bian

Authors
  1. Nirmalya Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vanessa Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingchen Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kesha A. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongseok Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Victoria Knieling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrew Bian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirmalya Thakur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

    Adela Coman

  2. University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

    Simona Vasilache

  3. City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

    Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah

  4. City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

    Keng Leng Siau

  5. University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA

    June Wei

  6. FORTH, Heraklion, Greece

    George Margetis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thakur, N. et al. (2025). A Labeled Dataset for Sentiment Analysis of Videos on YouTube, TikTok, and Other Sources About the 2024 Outbreak of Measles. In: Coman, A., Vasilache, S., Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Siau, K.L., Wei, J., Margetis, G. (eds) HCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15375. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76806-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76806-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-76805-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-76806-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics