Skip to main content

Web Accessibility: An Overlooked Right

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers (HCII 2024)

Abstract

The digitalisation of the public sphere is an ongoing process accelerated by the ubiquitousness of the internet. For the over a billion people estimated to live with an impairment, this digitalisation comes with barriers that can represent an altogether exclusion from the digital realm, hindering their full participation in society. This context should compel stakeholders involved in the development of digital products to consider accessibility as an essential requirement. However, that may not always be the case. This work is the product of a scoping literature review guided by the overarching topic of accessibility in the context of the web. After arguing that disability as a phenomenon might be more prevalent than one would think, it frames web accessibility as a human right that benefits all individuals, while also having important dimensions that businesses would regret ignoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alshayban, A., Ahmed, I., Malek, S.: Accessibility issues in android apps: state of affairs, sentiments, and ways forward. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 1323–1334. ICSE ’20, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380392

  2. Barreto, A., Hollier, S.: Visual disabilities. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds.) Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pp. 3–17. Springer, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_1

  3. Bennett, C.L., Rosner, D.K.: The promise of empathy: design, disability, and knowing the other. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. CHI ’19, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528

  4. Bi, T., Xia, X., Lo, D., Aleti, A.: A first look at accessibility issues in popular GitHub projects. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp. 390–401 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME52107.2021.00041

  5. Bi, T., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., Zimmermann, T., Ford, D.: Accessibility in software practice: a practitioner’s perspective. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 31(4) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3503508

  6. Botelho, F.H.F.: Accessibility to digital technology: virtual barriers, real opportunities. Assistive Technol. 33(sup1), 27–34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1945705, pMID: 34951832

  7. Brownlee, J.: How designing for disabled people is giving google an edge (2016). https://www.fastcompany.com/3060090/how-designing-for-the-disabled-is-giving-google-an-edge. Visited on 15 Mar 2024

  8. Cao, S., Loiacono, E.: Perceptions of web accessibility guidelines by student website and app developers. Behav. Inf. Technol. 41(12), 2616–2634 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1940278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Capelle-Blancard, G., Petit, A.: Every Little Helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. J. Bus. Ethics 157(2), 543–565 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donovan, R.: 2020 Annual Report: the global economics of disability (2020). https://www.rod-group.com/research-insights/annual-report-2020/

  11. European Commission: European accessibility act: Q &A. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1202&intPageId=5581. Visited on 25 Nov 2023

  12. European Commission: Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (Text with EEA relevance) (2019). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/882/oj/eng

  13. Eurostat: Digital society statistics at regional level (2023). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Digital_society_statistics_at_regional_level. Visited on 25 Nov 2023

  14. Eurostat: E-commerce sales of enterprises by size class of enterprise (2023). https://doi.org/10.2908/ISOC_EC_ESELS. Visited on 25 Nov 2023

  15. Eurostat: Employment by educational attainment level - annual data (2023). https://doi.org/10.2908/LFSI_EDUC_A. Visited on 3 Jan 2024

  16. Eurostat: Eu employment: use of digital devices (2023). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20230627-1. Visited on 19 Nov 2023

  17. Eurostat: Individuals - devices used to access the internet (2023). https://doi.org/10.2908/ISOC_CI_DEV_I, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_ci_dev_i/. Visited on 12 Nov 2023

  18. Eurostat: People at risk of poverty or social exclusion by level of activity limitation, sex and age (2023). https://doi.org/10.2908/HLTH_DPE010. Visited on 19 Nov 2023

  19. Ferri, D., Favalli, S.: Web accessibility for people with disabilities in the European union: paving the road to social inclusion. Societies 8(2) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8020040

  20. Friedman, C.: The relationship between disability prejudice and disability employment rates. Work 65(3), 591–598 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gates, G.A., Mills, J.H.: Presbycusis. Lancet 366(9491), 1111–1120 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67423-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Global Sustainable Investment Alliance: global sustainable investment review 2020 (2020). https://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GSIR-20201.pdf

  23. Henry, S.L.: Introduction to web accessibility (2022). https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/. Visited on 17 Nov 2023

  24. Henry, S.L.: WCAG 2 overview (2023). https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/. Visited on 1 Dec 2023

  25. Inal, Y., Guribye, F., Rajanen, D., Rajanen, M., Rost, M.: Perspectives and practices of digital accessibility: a survey of user experience professionals in Nordic countries. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. NordiCHI ’20, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420119

  26. Kulkarni, M.: Digital accessibility: challenges and opportunities. IIMB Manag. Rev. 31(1), 91–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurniawan, S., Arch, A., Smith, S.R.: Ageing and older adults. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds.) Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pp. 93–119. Springer London, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_6

  28. Kushalnagar, R.: Deafness and hearing loss. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds.) Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pp. 35–47. Springer London, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_3

  29. Marsden, J., Stevens, S., Ebri, A.: How to measure distance visual acuity. Community Eye Health 27(85), 16 (2014). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069781/

  30. Martin, L., Baker, C., Shinohara, K., Elglaly, Y.N.: The landscape of accessibility skill set in the software industry positions. In: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ASSETS ’22, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550389

  31. Martins, B., Duarte, C.: A large-scale web accessibility analysis considering technology adoption. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01010-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mendizabal, M.: Class action complaint and Jury Demand, Mendizabal V. Nike, INC., Case 1:17-cv-09498 (2017). https://www.classaction.org/media/mendizabal-v-nike-inc.pdf

  33. Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., Aromataris, E.: Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 18(1), 143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Munyi, C.W.: Past and present perceptions towards disability: a historical perspective. Disabil. Stud. Q. 32(2) (2012). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i2.3197

  35. Mäkipää, J.P., Norrgård, J., Vartiainen, T.: Factors Affecting the Accessibility of IT Artifacts: a systematic review. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 51(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05129

  36. Nicoara, R.: Working on a Team, pp. 187–197. Apress, Berkeley, CA (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9663-9

  37. OECD: mobile broadband subscriptions (2018). https://doi.org/10.1787/1277ddc6-en, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/1277ddc6-en. Visited on 12 Nov 2023

  38. OECD: Health at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing (2023). https://doi.org/10.1787/7a7afb35-en, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/7a7afb35-en

  39. Oncins, E.: Mapping the European digital accessibility field: the impact project. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion, pp. 33–37. DSAI ’20, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3440608

  40. Organization, I.S.: Standard 9241-11: ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 11: usability: definitions and concepts (2018). https://www.iso.org

  41. Pérez-Escolar, M., Canet, F.: Research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion: toward a consolidated taxonomical framework. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 22(3), 1059–1072 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00867-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Petrie, H., Kheir, O.: The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 397–406. CHI ’07, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240688

  43. Petrie, H., Savva, A., Power, C.: Towards a unified definition of web accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference. W4A ’15, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2745555.2746653

  44. Roper, A., Wilson, S., Neate, T., Marshall, J.: Speech and language. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds.) Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pp. 121–131. Springer, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_7

  45. Rush, S.: The business case for digital accessibility (2018). https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/. Visited on 25 Nov 2023

  46. Section 508 standards: ICT accessibility frequently asked questions (2023). https://www.section508.gov/manage/accessibility-faq/

  47. Seeman, L., Lewis, C.: Cognitive and learning disabilities. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds.) Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pp. 49–58. Springer, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_4

  48. Shakespeare, T.: The social model of disability. In: Davis, L.J., ed. The Disability Studies Reader, vol. 2, pp. 197–204 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Henry, S.L., Abou-Zahra, S., White, K.: Accessibility, usability, and inclusion (2016). https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/. Visited on 18 Nov 2023

  50. Carvalho da Silva, M.: Cinismo no combate à pobreza. Jornal de Notícias (2023). https://www.jn.pt/1667884945/cinismo-no-combate-a-pobreza/. Visited on 3 Dec. 2023

  51. Sohaib, O., Kang, K.: E-commerce web accessibility for people with disabilities. In: Goluchowski, J., Pankowska, M., Linger, H., Barry, C., Lang, M., Schneider, C. (eds.) Complexity in Information Systems Development, pp. 87–100. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Sprinkle, G.B., Maines, L.A.: The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Bus. Horiz. 53(5), 445–453 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., Booth, A.: Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Inf. Libr. J. 36(3), 202–222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Trewin, S.: Physical disabilities. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds.) Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pp. 19–33. Springer London, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_2

  55. UNICEF: Seen, counted, included: using data to shed light on the well-being of children with disabilities (2022). https://data.unicef.org/resources/children-with-disabilities-report-2021/. Visited on 19 Nov 2023

  56. United Nations: Universal declaration of human rights (1948). https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2021/03/udhr.pdf

  57. United Nations: convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (2006). https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf

  58. United Nations: transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (2015). https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

  59. United Nations: United nations treaty collection - 15. convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (2023). https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=iv-15 &chapter=4 &clang=_en. Visited on 25 Nov 2023

  60. Vollenwyder, B., Iten, G.H., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., Mekler, E.D.: Salient beliefs influencing the intention to consider web accessibility. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 352–360 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wadoux, J.: Digitalisation of services: ensuring equal access to all, including older people of today and tomorrow (2022). https://www.age-platform.eu/digitalisation-of-services-ensuring-equal-access-to-all-including-older-people-of-today-and-tomorrow/. Visited on 4 Jan 2024

  62. WAI, W3C: Introduction to understanding WCAG (2023). https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/intro. Visited on 1 Dec 2023

  63. WAI, W3C: Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 (2023). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/. Visited on 1 Dec 2023

  64. WebAIM: the webaim million (2023). https://webaim.org/projects/million/. Visited on 1 Dec 2023

  65. Wobbrock, J.O.: Situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds.) Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pp. 59–92. Springer, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_5

  66. World Health Organization: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva (2001). https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/42407/9241545429.pdf?sequence=1

  67. World Health Organization, World Bank: World report on disability 2011 (2011). https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44575

  68. Yeliz Yesilada, Giorgio Brajnik, M.V., Harper, S.: Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approach. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34(2), 119–134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.848238

  69. Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Vigo, M., Harper, S.: Understanding web accessibility and its drivers. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. W4A ’12, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207016.2207027

  70. Zahra, S.A.: Diverse abilities and barriers (2017). https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web/abilities-barriers/. Visited on 1 Dec 2023

  71. Zhao, Y., Gong, L., Yang, W., Zhou, Y.: How accessibility affects other quality attributes of software? A case study of GitHub. Sci. Comput. Program. 231, 103027 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2023.103027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhou, G., Liu, L., Luo, S.: Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: mediating effect of financial performance. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 31(7), 3371–3387 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FCT through the LASIGE Research Unit, ref. UIDB/00408/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00408/2020) and ref. UIDP/00408/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00408/2020), and by the COST Action LEAD-ME The Leading Platform for European Citizens, Industries, Academia, and Policymakers in Media Accessibility (CA19142).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Simões .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Simões, C., Seixas Pereira, L., Duarte, C. (2025). Web Accessibility: An Overlooked Right. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C., Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) HCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15379. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76818-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76818-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-76817-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-76818-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics