Abstract
Artificial Intelligence and hybrid approaches are increasingly relevant in Decision Science at both the scientific and industrial application levels. While symbolic approaches enjoy well-established techniques to verify their behaviour, data-driven or hybrid approaches can pose a risk in terms of robustness under uncertain conditions, and their behaviour can be less predictable and explainable in unexpected conditions. To address this challenge, the European Commission presented in 2019 the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI [1], and included in the Horizon Europe 2020–2024 programme a financing of 96 million euros for Trustworthy, Human Centred and Responsible AI. Amongst other initiatives, the TUPLES project [2] was initiated to develop the foundations, approaches and tools needed to achieve transparent, robust, and safe algorithmic solutions in Planning and scheduling (P&S), and increase confidence in these systems to accelerate their adoption. TUPLES is planned to release a toolkit including a set of simulation environments, a self-assessment tool to validate the confidence level of a P&S application, and will launch a competition in late 2024 to engage a wider audience and increase its impact [3]. We outline the challenges, approaches and objectives of the project, focusing on the use cases provided by OPTIT in the application sectors of Energy [4] and Waste management [5]. In doing so, we provide a concrete perspective on how Human Centred AI (with a specific focus on robustness and explainability) requires innovative strategies and approaches that will pave the way for significant improvements in the Decision Support Systems of the coming decades.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ethics guidelines for Trustworthy AI, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
TUPLES description, Trustworthy Planning and Scheduling with Learning and Explanations, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070149
TUPLES website, Trustworthy Planning and Scheduling with Learning and Explanations, https://tuples.ai/
OPTIT website, Energy Management DSS, https://www.optit.net/en/solutions/energy/
OPTIT website, Waste Management DSS, https://www.optit.net/en/solutions/waste/
Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., Balatti, E., Hackmann, A., Brendel, H., Puzzo, G., Volpi, L., Giusino, D., Angelis, M., Pietrantoni, L.: Assessing the transparency and explainability of AI algorithms in planning and scheduling tools: a review of the literature. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R. (Eds.) Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2023): Artificial Intelligence and Future Applications. AHFE (2023) International Conference. AHFE Open Access, vol. 111. AHFE International, USA (2023). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004068
Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., Volpi, L., Brendel, H., Pietrantoni, L.: Examining the Nexus between Explainability of AI Systems and User’s Trust: A cPreliminary Scoping Review. Proceedings http://ceur-ws.org, ISSN, 1613, 0073 (2023)
Silvestri, M., De Filippo, A., Lombardi, M., Milano, M.: UNIFY: a Unified Policy Designing Framework for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems with Machine Learning (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.14030
Silvestri, M., De Filippo, A., Lombardi, M., Berden, S., Mahmutogulları, A.I., Guns, T., Mandi, J., Mulamba, M.: Score Function Gradient Estimation to Widen the Applicability of Decision-Focused Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.05213
Elmachtoub, Adam, N., Grigas, P.: Smart “predict, then optimize”. Manage. Sci., 68(1), 9–26 (2022)
Wilder, B., Dilkina, B., Tambe, M.: Melding the data-decisions pipeline: decision-focused learning for combinatorial optimization. Proc. AAAI Conf. Arti. Intell 33(01), 1658–1665 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011658
Vlastelica M. et al., Differentiation of blackbox combinatorial solvers. (2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02175
Mandi, Jayanta, Stuckey P.J., Guns, T.: Smart predict-and-optimize for hard combinatorial optimization problems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 02, pp. 1603–1610 (2020)
Mandi, Jayanta, Kotary, J., Berden, S., Mulamba, M., Bucarey, V., Guns, T., Fioretto, F.: Decision-focused learning: Foundations, state of the art, benchmark and future opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13565 (2023)
Kotary, J., Fioretto, F., Van Hentenryck, P., Wilder, B.: End-to-end constrained optimization learning: a survey. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2021)
Miller, T.: Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences. Artif. Intell. 267, 1–38 (2019)
Narayanan, S., Yu, G., Chien-Ju, H., Ming, Y.: How does value similarity affect human reliance in AI-assisted ethical decision making?. In AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’23), August 08–10, 2023 ,Montréal, QC, Canada. ACM, NewYork, NY, USA (2023)
Mehrotra, S., Jonker, C.M., Tielman, M.L.: More similar values, more trust?—the effect of value similarity on trust in human-agent interaction. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’21), May 19–21, 2021, Virtual Event, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2021)
Bleukx I, Guns T., Tsouros D. (2024). CPMpy/XCP-explain: Recorded version (v1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10694140
Wagstaff, K., Cardie, C., Rogers, S., Schroedl, S.: Constrained K-means Clustering with Background Knowledge. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2001), Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA, June 28 - July 1, 2001 (2001). https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dgovinda/pdf/icml-2001.pdf
Block-oriented description of a fictional CHP generation plant for unit commitment testing, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10875998
Dataset for testing unit commitment models of CHCP plants, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10875471
Example instance of Waste collection services for testing routing algorithms, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10875680
Example solution of Waste collection routing for benchmarking routing algorithms, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10875837
Acknowledgments
This project has received funding from the European Union’s HORIZON-CL4–2021-HUMAN-01 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 101070149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gordini, A. et al. (2025). Trustworthiness of AI in Planning and Scheduling: The Experience of the TUPLES Project. In: Juan, A.A., Faulin, J., Lopez-Lopez, D. (eds) Decision Sciences. DSA ISC 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78241-1_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78241-1_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-78240-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-78241-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)