Skip to main content

A Lightweight Approach for User and Keyword Classification in Controversial Topics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 15212))

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

Classifying the stance of individuals on controversial topics and uncovering their concerns is crucial for social scientists and policymakers. Data from Online Social Networks (OSNs), which serve as a proxy to a representative sample of society, offers an opportunity to classify these stances, discover society’s concerns regarding controversial topics, and track the evolution of these concerns over time. Consequently, stance classification in OSNs has garnered significant attention from researchers. However, most existing methods for this task often rely on labelled data and utilise the text of users’ posts or the interactions between users, necessitating large volumes of data, considerable processing time, and access to information that is not readily available (e.g. users’ followers/followees). This paper proposes a lightweight approach for the stance classification of users and keywords in OSNs, aiming at understanding the collective opinion of individuals and their concerns. Our approach employs a tailored random walk model, requiring just one keyword representing each stance, using solely the keywords in social media posts. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to the baselines, excelling in stance classification of users and keywords, with a running time that, while not the fastest, remains competitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aldayel, A., Magdy, W.: Your stance is exposed! analysing possible factors for stance detection on social media. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ALDayel, A., Magdy, W.: Stance detection on social media: state of the art and trends. Inf. Process. Manage. 58(4), 102597 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alturayeif, N., Luqman, H., Ahmed, M.: A systematic review of machine learning techniques for stance detection and its applications. Neural Comput. Appl. 35(7), 5113–5144 (2023)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Coletto, M., Lucchese, C., Orlando, S., Perego, R.: Polarized user and topic tracking in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 945–948 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darwish, K., Magdy, W., Zanouda, T.: Improved stance prediction in a user similarity feature space. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 145–148 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Darwish, K., Stefanov, P., Aupetit, M., Nakov, P.: Unsupervised user stance detection on twitter. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 14, issue 1, pp. 141–152 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fletcher, R.: Did the conservatives embrace social media in 2019. UK election analysis, pp. 1–123 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grčar, M., Cherepnalkoski, D., Mozetič, I., Kralj Novak, P.: Stance and influence of Twitter users regarding the Brexit referendum. Comput. Soc. Netw. 4, 1–25 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khatua, A., Khatua, A.: Leave or Remain? Deciphering Brexit deliberations on twitter. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pp. 428–433 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kobbe, J., Hulpuş, I., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequences. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 50–60 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammad, S.M., Sobhani, P., Kiritchenko, S.: Stance and sentiment in tweets. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 17(3) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Samih, Y., Darwish, K.: A few topical tweets are enough for effective user stance detection. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pp. 2637–2646 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, E.M., Carley, K.M.: TSPA: efficient target-stance detection on twitter. In: 2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 242–246 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, L., Zhou, K., Liu, C.: Stance detection of user reviews on social network with integrated structural information. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 44(2), 1703–1714 (2023)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the UK’s innovation agency (InnovateUK) grant number 10039039 (approved under the Horizon Europe Programme as VIGILANT, EU grant agreement number 101073921) (https://www.vigilantproject.eu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Zareie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zareie, A., Bontcheva, K., Scarton, C. (2025). A Lightweight Approach for User and Keyword Classification in Controversial Topics. In: Aiello, L.M., Chakraborty, T., Gaito, S. (eds) Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ASONAM 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78538-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78538-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-78537-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-78538-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics