Abstract
This study examines how factual claims of different significance influence and reflect social media users’ behavioral patterns. Leveraging “check-worthiness” as a measure of the factual significance of claims, we analyze the connection between factual claims and user behaviors on Twitter. Through a series of experiments using statistical methods such as correlation analysis and hypothesis testing, we provide insights into a few pivotal inquiries: (1) whether differences exist between users’ tweeting tendencies toward check-worthiness, (2) the underlying reasons for such differences, (3) whether users tend to create, share, and endorse content with check-worthiness levels similar to their own tweets, and (4) whether users with similar tendencies toward check-worthiness exhibit heightened engagement. The experiments were conducted across three datasets, comprising over 48.5 million tweets and involving 15,000 users, spanning several domains and yielding statistically significant findings. Previous studies have primarily centered on examining the effectiveness and strategies of fact-checks rather than understanding people’s behavioral tendencies toward factual claims. Our research pioneers understanding in this area, offering valuable insights for behavioral modeling and social sciences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 57(1), 289–300 (1995)
Bovet, A., Makse, H.A.: Influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 7 (2019)
Brummette, J., DiStaso, M., Vafeiadis, M., Messner, M.: Read all about it: the politicization of “fake news” on twitter. Journ. Mass Commun. Q. 95(2), 497–517 (2018)
Brunner, E., Munzel, U.: The nonparametric behrens-fisher problem: asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation. Biometrical J. J. Math. Methods Biosci. 42(1), 17–25 (2000)
Chen, J., Liu, Y., Zou, M.: User emotion for modeling retweeting behaviors. Neural Netw. 96, 11–21 (2017)
Clayton, K., et al.: Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Polit. Behav. 42, 1073–1095 (2020)
Cohen, I., et al.: Pearson correlation coefficient. In: Noise Reduction in Speech Processing, pp. 1–4 (2009)
Comarela, G., Crovella, M., Almeida, V., Benevenuto, F.: Understanding factors that affect response rates in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 123–132 (2012)
Firdaus, S.N., Ding, C., Sadeghian, A.: Topic specific emotion detection for retweet prediction. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 10, 2071–2083 (2019)
Funke, D.: This Washington post fact check was chosen by a bot (2018)
Hansen, C., Hansen, C., Alstrup, S., Grue Simonsen, J., Lioma, C.: Neural check-worthiness ranking with weak supervision: Finding sentences for fact-checking. In: Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 994–1000 (2019)
Hassan, N., Li, C., Tremayne, M.: Detecting check-worthy factual claims in presidential debates. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1835–1838 (2015)
Hassan, N., Tremayne, M., Arslan, F., Li, C.: Comparing automated factual claim detection against judgments of journalism organizations. In: Computation+ Journalism Symposium, pp. 1–5 (2016)
Hassan, N., et al.: Claimbuster: the first-ever end-to-end fact-checking system. Proc. VLDB Endow. 10(12), 1945–1948 (2017)
Hopcroft, J., Lou, T., Tang, J.: Who will follow you back? Reciprocal relationship prediction. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1137–1146 (2011)
Hu, X., Tang, L., Tang, J., Liu, H.: Exploiting social relations for sentiment analysis in microblogging. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 537–546 (2013)
Kim, H.S., et al.: Fact-checking and audience engagement: a study of content analysis and audience behavioral data of fact-checking coverage from news media. Digit. Journ. 10(5), 781–800 (2022)
Lespagnol, C., Mothe, J., Ullah, M.Z.: Information nutritional label and word embedding to estimate information check-worthiness. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 941–944 (2019)
Majithia, S., et al.: Claimportal: integrated monitoring, searching, checking, and analytics of factual claims on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 153–158 (2019)
Massey, F.J., Jr.: The kolmogorov-smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46(253), 68–78 (1951)
Park, S., Park, J.Y., Chin, H., Kang, J.h., Cha, M.: An experimental study to understand user experience and perception bias occurred by fact-checking messages. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, pp. 2769–2780 (2021)
Rony, M.M.U., Hoque, E., Hassan, N.: Claimviz: visual analytics for identifying and verifying factual claims. In: 2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS), pp. 246–250. IEEE (2020)
Samadi, M., Talukdar, P., Veloso, M., Blum, M.: Claimeval: integrated and flexible framework for claim evaluation using credibility of sources. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 30 (2016)
Shamma, D.A., Kennedy, L., Churchill, E.F.: Tweet the debates: understanding community annotation of uncollected sources. In: Proceedings of the First SIGMM Workshop on Social Media, pp. 3–10 (2009)
Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4), 591–611 (1965)
Shu, K., Cui, L., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: defend: explainable fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 395–405 (2019)
Vasileva, S., Atanasova, P., Màrquez, L., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Nakov, P.: It takes nine to smell a rat: neural multi-task learning for check-worthiness prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07912 (2019)
Wright, D., Augenstein, I.: Claim check-worthiness detection as positive unlabelled learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02736 (2020)
Acknowledgement
This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation award #2346261. The authors acknowledge the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at The University of Texas at Austin for providing HPC resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, Z., Zhu, Z., Zhang, H., Li, C. (2025). Exploring Behavioral Tendencies on Social Media: A Perspective Through Claim Check-Worthiness. In: Aiello, L.M., Chakraborty, T., Gaito, S. (eds) Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ASONAM 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15211. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78541-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78541-2_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-78540-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-78541-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)