Skip to main content

TrustOps: Continuously Building Trustworthy Software

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2024 Workshops (EDOC 2024)

Abstract

Software services play a crucial role in daily life, with automated actions determining access to resources and information. Trusting service providers to perform these actions fairly and accurately is essential, yet challenging for users to verify. Even with publicly available codebases, the rapid pace of development and the complexity of modern deployments hinder the understanding and evaluation of service actions, including for experts. Hence, current trust models rely heavily on the assumption that service providers follow best practices and adhere to laws and regulations, which is increasingly impractical and risky, leading to undetected flaws and data leaks.

In this paper, we argue that gathering verifiable evidence during software development and operations is needed for creating a new trust model. Therefore, we present TrustOps, an approach for continuously collecting verifiable evidence in all phases of the software life cycle, relying on and combining already existing tools and trust-enhancing technologies to do so. For this, we introduce the adaptable core principles of TrustOps and provide a roadmap for future research and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    (CVE-2024-3094) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3094.

  2. 2.

    https://heartbleed.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://blog.npmjs.org/post/180565383195/details-about-the-event-stream-incident.

  4. 4.

    https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-44228.

  5. 5.

    https://cloud.google.com/mongodb.

  6. 6.

    “Other optional tools in MongoDB Atlas require customer query log data to transit through our US-based servers.” – https://www.mongodb.com/legal/privacy.

  7. 7.

    A continuously updating collection of these resources is available here: https://github.com/trustops/awesome-trustops.

References

  1. Bass, L., Weber, I., Zhu, L.: DevOps: A Software Architect’s Perspective. Addison-Wesley Professional (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dauterman, E., et al.: Reflections on trusting distributed trust. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, pp. 38–45 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delignat-Lavaud, A., et al.: Why should i trust your code? Queue 21(4), 94–122 (2023)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Eberhardt, J.: Scalable and privacy-preserving off-chain computations. Ph.D. thesis, TU Berlin (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enoiu, E.P., et al.: VeriDevOps software methodology: security verification and validation for DevOps practices. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 1–9 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 176–189 (2017)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Grünewald, E.: Cloud native privacy engineering through DevPrivOps. In: Friedewald, M., Krenn, S., Schiering, I., Schiffner, S. (eds.) Privacy and Identity 2021. IAICT, vol. 644, pp. 122–141. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99100-5_10

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Heiss, J.: Trustworthy data provisioning in blockchain-based decentralized applications. Ph.D. thesis, TU Berlin (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hou, F., Jansen, S.: A systematic literature review on trust in the software ecosystem. Empir. Softw. Eng. 28(1), 8 (2023)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hühnlein, D., et al.: FutureTrust–future trust services for trustworthy global transactions. In: Challenges in Cybersecurity and Privacy-the European Research Landscape, pp. 285–301. River Publishers (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Industrial communication networks - Network and system security. Standard, International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Geneva, CH (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Security and resilience - Authenticity, integrity and trust for products and documents. Standard, ISO, Geneva, CH (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for protection of personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds acting as PII processors. Standard, ISO, Geneva, CH (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Information technology - DevOps - Building reliable and secure systems including application build, package and deployment. Standard, ISO, Geneva, CH (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manuel, P.: A trust model of cloud computing based on quality of service. Ann. Oper. Res. 233, 281–292 (2015)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayer, R.C., et al.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Myrbakken, H., Colomo-Palacios, R.: DevSecOps: a multivocal literature review. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2017. CCIS, vol. 770, pp. 17–29. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. European Parliament and Council of the European Union: General Data Protection Regulation (2018). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679

  19. Ross, R., Winstead, M., McEvilley, M.: NIST SP 800-160 Vol. 1 Rev. 1: Engineering Trustworthy Secure Systems (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez-Gordón, M., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Security as culture: a systematic literature review of DevSecOps. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops, pp. 266–269 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ting, H.L.J., et al.: On the trust and trust modeling for the future fully-connected digital world: a comprehensive study. IEEE Access 9, 106743–106783 (2021)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funded by the European Union (TEADAL, 101070186). Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Brito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brito, E., Castillo, F., Pullonen-Raudvere, P., Werner, S. (2025). TrustOps: Continuously Building Trustworthy Software. In: Kaczmarek-Heß, M., Rosenthal, K., Suchánek, M., Da Silva, M.M., Proper, H.A., Schnellmann, M. (eds) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2024 Workshops . EDOC 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 537. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79059-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79059-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-79058-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-79059-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics