Skip to main content

Ontological Analysis of Advanced Capability Modeling in ArchiMate: A First Step Towards Language Revision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2024 Workshops (EDOC 2024)

Abstract

In order to support capability management, the field of Enterprise Architecture proposes methods and notations to model enterprises and their capabilities. ArchiMate is one of such notations and includes constructs to support capability mapping and other capability management tasks. However, the notation lacks some fine-grained distinctions that are required to understand intricate phenomena involving capabilities, including capability interaction and the emergence of capabilities. In this work, we perform an ontological analysis of the language’s support for capability modeling based on a well-founded ontology of capabilities aligned with the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). Through this ontological analysis, we identify some issues outlining possible improvements for ArchiMate. This is a first step towards language redesign, which may include the proposal of language patterns and/or the revision of language constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Antunes, G., Borbinha, J.: Capabilities in systems engineering: an overview. In: Exploring Services Science: 4th International Conference, IESS 2013, Porto, Portugal, 7–8 February 2013. Proceedings 4, pp. 29–42. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Appelbaum, S.H.: Socio-technical systems theory: an intervention strategy for organizational development. Manag. Decis. 35(6), 452–463 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Azevedo, C.L.B., et al.: An ontology-based well-founded proposal for modeling resources and capabilities in ArchiMate. In: 17th IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2013), pp. 39–48. IEEE Computer Society Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azevedo, C.L.B., Iacob, M., Almeida, J.P.A., van Sinderen, M., Pires, L.F., Guizzardi, G.: Modeling resources and capabilities in enterprise architecture: a well-founded ontology-based proposal for ArchiMate. Inf. Syst. 54, 235–262 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barton, A., et al.: A taxonomy of disposition-parthood. In: Workshop on Foundational Ontology in Joint Ontology Workshops: JOWO 2017, vol. 2050, pp. 1–10. CEUR-WS: Workshop Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernus, P.: Enterprise models for enterprise architecture and ISO9000:2000. Annu. Rev. Control. 27(2), 211–220 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruseberg, A., Lintern, G.: Human factors integration for MODAF: needs and solution approaches. In: INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 17, pp. 1240–1255. Wiley Online Library (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems. Springer, Dordrecht (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calhau, R.F., Almeida, J.P.A., Kokkula, S., Guizzardi, G.: Modeling competences in enterprise architecture: from knowledge, skills, and attitudes to organizational capabilities. Softw. Syst. Model. 1–40 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calhau, R.F., et al.: A system core ontology for capability emergence modeling. In: International Conference on Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing, pp. 3–20. Springer (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calhau, R.F., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: A capability reference ontology for the analysis and design of system capabilities. Pre-print. https://purl.org/nemo/paper/creon

  12. Cummings, T.G.: Self-regulating work groups: a socio-technical synthesis. Acad. Manag. Rev. 3(3), 625–634 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellen, P.S., Bearden, W.O., Sharma, S.: Resistance to technological innovations: an examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 19, 297–307 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Galton, A., et al.: Dispositions and the infectious disease ontology. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (FOIS 2010), vol. 209, p. 400. IOS Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the unified foundational ontology (UFO) story. Appl. Ontol. 10, 259–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-150157

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. No. 15 in Telematica Inst. Fundamental Research Series, Telematica Inst., Enschede, The Netherlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guizzardi, G., et al.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Conceptual Modeling, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC/IEEE 42020:2019 Software, Systems and Enterprise–Architecture Processes (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jonkers, H., Band, I., Quartel, D., Lankhorst, M.: Archisurance case study (version 3.1). Technical report, The Open Group (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Josey, A.: TOGAF® version 9.1-A pocket guide. Van Haren (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Juarrero, A.: Dynamics in action: intentional behavior as a complex system. Emergence 2(2), 24–57 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kochan, T., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J.: Integrating social and technical systems: lessons from the auto industry (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maier, J.: Abilities. In: Zalta, E.N., Nodelman, U. (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2022 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, J., Fairley, D., Lawson, B., Faisandier, A.: Enterprise systems engineering background. In: Guide to the System Engineering Book of Knowledge (SEBoK), version 2.5, pp. 642–650. BKCASE (2021). https://sebokwiki.org/w/images/sebokwiki-farm!w/2/24/SEBoKv2.5.pdf

  25. Martin, J., Lawson, B., Faisandier, A.: Enterprise capability management. In: Guide to the System Engineering Book of Knowledge (SEBoK), version 2.5. BKCASE (2021). https://sebokwiki.org/w/images/sebokwiki-farm!w/2/24/SEBoKv2.5.pdf

  26. Martin, J.N., O’Neil, D.P.: Enterprise architecture guide for the unified architecture framework (UAF). In: INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 31, pp. 242–263. Wiley Online Library (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mavor, A.S., Pew, R.W. (eds.): Human-System Integration in the System Development Process: A New Look. The National Academies Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Merrell, E., et al.: Capabilities (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Molnar, G., Bradley, N.: Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Clarendon Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan, P.: The concept of capacity (draft version). In: Study on Capacity, Change and Performance, pp. 1–19 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mossio, M., et al.: Emergence, closure and inter-level causation in biological systems. Erkenntnis 78(S2), 153–178 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Mumford, S., Anjum, R.: Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nardi, J., et al.: A commitment-based reference ontology for services. Inf. Syst. 54, 263–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.01.012

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Connor, T.: Emergent properties. Am. Philos. Q. 31(2), 91–104 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Oliveira, Í., Sales, T.P., Almeida, J.P.A., Baratella, R., Fumagalli, M., Guizzardi, G.: Ontological analysis and redesign of security modeling in ArchiMate. In: IFIP Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pp. 82–98. Springer (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Open Group: ArchiMate® 3.0. 1 Specification: The Open Group Standard. Van Haren Publishing, Reading (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sales, T.P., Roelens, B., Poels, G., Guizzardi, G., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: A pattern language for value modeling in ArchiMate. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 31st International Conference, CAiSE 2019, Rome, Italy, 3–7 June 2019, Proceedings 31, pp. 230–245. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Saxena, M.: Capability Management. Global India Publications (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Senge, P.M.: The fifth discipline. Measur. Bus. Excellence (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spencer-Smith, R.: Reductionism and emergent properties. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, pp. 113–129. JSTOR (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  41. The Open Group: Archimate 3.2 specification (2023). https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/

  42. The Open Group: TOGAF Business Capabilities Guide V2 (2023). https://pubs.opengroup.org/togaf-standard/business-architecture/business-capabilities.html. Accessed 06 Oct 2023

  43. Thorn, S.: Redefining traceability in Enterprise Architecture and implementing the concept with TOGAF 9.1 and/or ArchiMate 2.0 (2013). https://blog.opengroup.org/author/opengroupblog/

  44. Weber, R.: Ontological foundations of information systems (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed in part by the Brazilian funding agencies CNPq (443130/2023-0, 313412/2023-5) and FAPES (2021-GL60J, 2022-NGKM5, 1022/2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giancarlo Guizzardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Calhau, R.F., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G. (2025). Ontological Analysis of Advanced Capability Modeling in ArchiMate: A First Step Towards Language Revision. In: Kaczmarek-Heß, M., Rosenthal, K., Suchánek, M., Da Silva, M.M., Proper, H.A., Schnellmann, M. (eds) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2024 Workshops . EDOC 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 537. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79059-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79059-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-79058-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-79059-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics