Abstract
In order to support capability management, the field of Enterprise Architecture proposes methods and notations to model enterprises and their capabilities. ArchiMate is one of such notations and includes constructs to support capability mapping and other capability management tasks. However, the notation lacks some fine-grained distinctions that are required to understand intricate phenomena involving capabilities, including capability interaction and the emergence of capabilities. In this work, we perform an ontological analysis of the language’s support for capability modeling based on a well-founded ontology of capabilities aligned with the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). Through this ontological analysis, we identify some issues outlining possible improvements for ArchiMate. This is a first step towards language redesign, which may include the proposal of language patterns and/or the revision of language constructs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antunes, G., Borbinha, J.: Capabilities in systems engineering: an overview. In: Exploring Services Science: 4th International Conference, IESS 2013, Porto, Portugal, 7–8 February 2013. Proceedings 4, pp. 29–42. Springer (2013)
Appelbaum, S.H.: Socio-technical systems theory: an intervention strategy for organizational development. Manag. Decis. 35(6), 452–463 (1997)
Azevedo, C.L.B., et al.: An ontology-based well-founded proposal for modeling resources and capabilities in ArchiMate. In: 17th IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2013), pp. 39–48. IEEE Computer Society Press (2013)
Azevedo, C.L.B., Iacob, M., Almeida, J.P.A., van Sinderen, M., Pires, L.F., Guizzardi, G.: Modeling resources and capabilities in enterprise architecture: a well-founded ontology-based proposal for ArchiMate. Inf. Syst. 54, 235–262 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.04.008
Barton, A., et al.: A taxonomy of disposition-parthood. In: Workshop on Foundational Ontology in Joint Ontology Workshops: JOWO 2017, vol. 2050, pp. 1–10. CEUR-WS: Workshop Proceedings (2017)
Bernus, P.: Enterprise models for enterprise architecture and ISO9000:2000. Annu. Rev. Control. 27(2), 211–220 (2003)
Bruseberg, A., Lintern, G.: Human factors integration for MODAF: needs and solution approaches. In: INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 17, pp. 1240–1255. Wiley Online Library (2007)
Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems. Springer, Dordrecht (1979)
Calhau, R.F., Almeida, J.P.A., Kokkula, S., Guizzardi, G.: Modeling competences in enterprise architecture: from knowledge, skills, and attitudes to organizational capabilities. Softw. Syst. Model. 1–40 (2024)
Calhau, R.F., et al.: A system core ontology for capability emergence modeling. In: International Conference on Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing, pp. 3–20. Springer (2023)
Calhau, R.F., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: A capability reference ontology for the analysis and design of system capabilities. Pre-print. https://purl.org/nemo/paper/creon
Cummings, T.G.: Self-regulating work groups: a socio-technical synthesis. Acad. Manag. Rev. 3(3), 625–634 (1978)
Ellen, P.S., Bearden, W.O., Sharma, S.: Resistance to technological innovations: an examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 19, 297–307 (1991)
Galton, A., et al.: Dispositions and the infectious disease ontology. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (FOIS 2010), vol. 209, p. 400. IOS Press (2010)
Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the unified foundational ontology (UFO) story. Appl. Ontol. 10, 259–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-150157
Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. No. 15 in Telematica Inst. Fundamental Research Series, Telematica Inst., Enschede, The Netherlands (2005)
Guizzardi, G., et al.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Conceptual Modeling, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC/IEEE 42020:2019 Software, Systems and Enterprise–Architecture Processes (2019)
Jonkers, H., Band, I., Quartel, D., Lankhorst, M.: Archisurance case study (version 3.1). Technical report, The Open Group (2019)
Josey, A.: TOGAF® version 9.1-A pocket guide. Van Haren (2016)
Juarrero, A.: Dynamics in action: intentional behavior as a complex system. Emergence 2(2), 24–57 (2000)
Kochan, T., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J.: Integrating social and technical systems: lessons from the auto industry (2008)
Maier, J.: Abilities. In: Zalta, E.N., Nodelman, U. (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2022 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2022)
Martin, J., Fairley, D., Lawson, B., Faisandier, A.: Enterprise systems engineering background. In: Guide to the System Engineering Book of Knowledge (SEBoK), version 2.5, pp. 642–650. BKCASE (2021). https://sebokwiki.org/w/images/sebokwiki-farm!w/2/24/SEBoKv2.5.pdf
Martin, J., Lawson, B., Faisandier, A.: Enterprise capability management. In: Guide to the System Engineering Book of Knowledge (SEBoK), version 2.5. BKCASE (2021). https://sebokwiki.org/w/images/sebokwiki-farm!w/2/24/SEBoKv2.5.pdf
Martin, J.N., O’Neil, D.P.: Enterprise architecture guide for the unified architecture framework (UAF). In: INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 31, pp. 242–263. Wiley Online Library (2021)
Mavor, A.S., Pew, R.W. (eds.): Human-System Integration in the System Development Process: A New Look. The National Academies Press (2007)
Merrell, E., et al.: Capabilities (2022)
Molnar, G., Bradley, N.: Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Clarendon Press (2003)
Morgan, P.: The concept of capacity (draft version). In: Study on Capacity, Change and Performance, pp. 1–19 (2006)
Mossio, M., et al.: Emergence, closure and inter-level causation in biological systems. Erkenntnis 78(S2), 153–178 (2013)
Mumford, S., Anjum, R.: Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford University Press (2011)
Nardi, J., et al.: A commitment-based reference ontology for services. Inf. Syst. 54, 263–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.01.012
O’Connor, T.: Emergent properties. Am. Philos. Q. 31(2), 91–104 (1994)
Oliveira, Í., Sales, T.P., Almeida, J.P.A., Baratella, R., Fumagalli, M., Guizzardi, G.: Ontological analysis and redesign of security modeling in ArchiMate. In: IFIP Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pp. 82–98. Springer (2022)
Open Group: ArchiMate® 3.0. 1 Specification: The Open Group Standard. Van Haren Publishing, Reading (2017)
Sales, T.P., Roelens, B., Poels, G., Guizzardi, G., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: A pattern language for value modeling in ArchiMate. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 31st International Conference, CAiSE 2019, Rome, Italy, 3–7 June 2019, Proceedings 31, pp. 230–245. Springer (2019)
Saxena, M.: Capability Management. Global India Publications (2009)
Senge, P.M.: The fifth discipline. Measur. Bus. Excellence (1997)
Spencer-Smith, R.: Reductionism and emergent properties. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, pp. 113–129. JSTOR (1995)
The Open Group: Archimate 3.2 specification (2023). https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/
The Open Group: TOGAF Business Capabilities Guide V2 (2023). https://pubs.opengroup.org/togaf-standard/business-architecture/business-capabilities.html. Accessed 06 Oct 2023
Thorn, S.: Redefining traceability in Enterprise Architecture and implementing the concept with TOGAF 9.1 and/or ArchiMate 2.0 (2013). https://blog.opengroup.org/author/opengroupblog/
Weber, R.: Ontological foundations of information systems (1997)
Acknowledgments
This study was financed in part by the Brazilian funding agencies CNPq (443130/2023-0, 313412/2023-5) and FAPES (2021-GL60J, 2022-NGKM5, 1022/2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Calhau, R.F., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G. (2025). Ontological Analysis of Advanced Capability Modeling in ArchiMate: A First Step Towards Language Revision. In: Kaczmarek-Heß, M., Rosenthal, K., Suchánek, M., Da Silva, M.M., Proper, H.A., Schnellmann, M. (eds) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2024 Workshops . EDOC 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 537. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79059-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79059-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-79058-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-79059-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)