Skip to main content

e-Destination Structure: a Network Analysis Approach

  • Conference paper
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2008

Abstract

This study analyses the connectivity of tourism attractions in a destination as a unique product marketed online. An online search is empirically performed to characterize the city of Lisbon as an e-destination. This study presents a quantitative methodology to study e-destination using network analyses. Methods applied reveal that information about tourism attractions is very heterogeneously distributed on different online sources. The way tourism attractions are connected show that highly connected attractions connect the less connected ones. This property is known as disassortative mixing, and is typical of technological and biological networks. This study suggests a need for an online strategy based on the integration of tourism attractions and entertainment, directly influencing tourist to receive more information and their propensity to stay longer in the destination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrat, A. Barthelemy, M. Pastor-Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101: 3747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D. (2003). eTourism: Information Technology for Strategic Tourism Management. Harlow, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D. & Main, H. (1998). Information technology in peripheral small and medium hospitality enterprises: Strategic analysis and critical factors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 10(5): 198–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D. & Oconnor, P. (2006). Information and Communication Technology — Revolutionizing Tourism. Tourism Managemnt Dynamics. D. Buhalis and C. Costa. Oxford, Elsevier: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfu, A. & Kastenholz, E. (2005). The Opportunities and Limitations of the Internet in Providing a Quality Tourist Experience: the Case of “Solares de Portugal”. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism 6(1/2): 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corfu, A. Laranja, M. et al. (2003). Evaluation of Tourism Website Effectiveness: Methodological Issues and Survey Results. 10th International Human Computer Interaction 2003, jointly with Symposium of Human Interface (Japan) 2003, 5th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, 2nd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Crete, Greece, 1, 753–757, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolin, B. Burgess, L. et al. (2002). Evaluating the use of the Web for tourism marketing: A case study from New Zealand. Tourism Management 23(5): 557–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorogovtsev, S. N. & Mendes, J. F. F. (2003). Evolution of networks: From biological nets to the internet and WWW. Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faloutsos, M. Faloutsos, P. & Faloutsos, C. (1999). On power law relationships of the Internet topology. Computer Communication Review 29(4) pp. 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks (Soc. networks) 1: pp. 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y.-H. Gretzel, U. Fenmaier, D. (2006). Multicity trip patterns tourists to the United States. Annals of Tourism Research 33(4): pp. 1057–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkheer, K. (1999). Intelligent agents, markets and competition: Consumers’ interests and functionality of destination sites. First Monday 4(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierzkowski, A. et al. (1996). Marketing to the Digital Consumer. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. Modsching & M. Hagen, K. (2006). A city guide agent creating and adapting individual sightseeing tours based on field trial results. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research 2(2) pp. 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. C. (2000). The effect of the Internet on travel consumer purchasing behaviour and implications for travel agencies. Journal of Vacation Marketing 6(4): 368–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti, L. & Petrillo, C. S. (2006). Tourism Local Systems and Networking. Elsevier: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. C. & Chau, H. F. (2006). Weighted Assortative and Disassortative Networks Model. eprint arXiv:physics/0607134, to be published in Physica A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P.A. (2000). Networking in the homestay sector. The Services Industries Journal, 20(3): pp. 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen, C. (2007). Trends in European Internet Distribution — of Travel and Tourism Services, URL: http://www.crt.dk/uk/staff/chm/trends.htm, [accessed 25/10/2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, V. (2000). Competition in the international hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 12(2): pp. 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MiguĂ©ns, J.I.L., Mendes, J.F.F. & Costa, C. (2007). International Tourism Network. Proc. SPIE 6601,660118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. Lynch, P. & Johns, N. (2004). International tourism networks. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 16(3): 198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(20): 208701–208704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. P. (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. SAGE Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A. (2005). The Internet Challenge for Destination Marketing. Destination Branding: Creating the Unique Destination Proposition. N. Morgan, A. Pritchard and R. Pride. Oxford, Elsevier: 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pröll, B. and Retschitzegger, W. (2000). Discovering next generation tourism information systems: A tour on TIScover. Journal of Travel Research 39(2): 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, H.-Y. (2006). Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: an application of network analysis in tourism. Tourism Management 27(5): 1029–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. L. (1989). Tourism Analysis, A Handbook. Logman: Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature 410: 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers, J. & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32(4): 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. Faust, K. & Iacobucci, D. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences), Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miguéns, J., Corfu, A. (2008). e-Destination Structure: a Network Analysis Approach. In: O’Connor, P., Höpken, W., Gretzel, U. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2008. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77280-5_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77280-5_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-77279-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-77280-5

Publish with us

Policies and ethics