Skip to main content

Assessing the Dynamics of Search Results in Google

  • Conference paper
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2010
  • 2933 Accesses

Abstract

Search engine marketing requires a substantive understanding of the dynamics of the search system in the travel information search context. The goal of this study is to explore the dynamic nature of online information space through Google as well as its direct impact on the traffic of a destination website. Utilizing a computer program to track Google search results, Google Trends, and a Destination Marketing Organization’s (DMO) website traffic data, this study identified the variation in information space as reflected by different queries related to Charleston, South Carolina. The results of regression analysis indicates that the web traffic of the Charleston Convention and Visitors Bureau website was strongly correlated with search volumes for certain queries and the ranking of some queries in Google.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (1999). Search engine results over time: a case study on search engine stability. Cybermetrics, 2(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2004). Search engine ability to cope with the changing web. Web Dynamics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2007). Google bombing from a time perspective. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 910–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (1998). Regression analysis of count data: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2009). Predicting the Present with Google Trends. Retrieved from http://google.com/googleblogs/pdfs/google_predicting_the_present.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • eMarketer (2008). First Summer Vacation Stop: The Internet Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006344&src=article1_newsltr

    Google Scholar 

  • Google (2006). Seattle’s Convention and Visitors Bureau found 30% ROI with Google AdWords Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.google.com/ads/scvb.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Google (2009a). About Google Trends Retrieved August 30, 2009, from http://www.google. com/intl/en/trends/about.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Google (2009b) Google AdWords Keyword Tool Retrieved July 1, from https://adwords. google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal

    Google Scholar 

  • Henzinger, M. (2007). Search technologies for the Internet. Science, 317(5837), 468–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitwise (2009). Top 20 Sites & Engines Retrieved August 24, 2009, from http://www.hitwise. com/datacenter/main/dashboard-10133.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Pedersen, J. (2005). A temporal comparison of AltaVista Web searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(6), 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2008). Persuasive design of destination Websites: an analysis of first impression. Journal of Travel Research, 47(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, B., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2006). Online Information Search: Vacation Planning Process. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 809–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, B., & Tierney, H.L.R. (2009). A Poisson Regression Examination of the Relationship between Web Traffic and SearchEngine Queries. Technical Report, available at http://www.ota.cofc.edu/pan/PoissonRegressionOfWebTraffic.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google We Trust: Users’ Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prophis-Research (2007). 2006 US Online Travel Process Report: Prophis Research and Consulting, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, C. (2005). Deconstructing google bombs: A breach of symbolic power of just a goofy prank? First Monday, 10(10). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/ issue10 10/tatum/

    Google Scholar 

  • TIA (2005). Travelers’ Use of the Internet. Washington, DC: Travel Industry Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIA (2008). Travelers’ Use of the Internet. Washington D.C.: Travel Industry Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2009). Google Trends Retrieved August 30, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Google_Trends

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöber, K. (2006). Domain specific search engines. In D. R. Fesenmaier, K. Wöber & H. Werthner (Eds.), Destination Recommendation Systems: Behavioral Foundations and Applications. Wallingford, UK: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., & Davison, B. D. (2005). Identifying link farm spam pages. Paper presented at the Special interest tracks and posters of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2006). Assessing the initial step in the persuasion process: Meta tags on destination marketing websites. Information Technology & Tourism, 8(2), 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, Z., Wöber, K., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2008). Representation of the online tourism domain in search engines. Journal of Travel Research, 47(2), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pan, B., Xiang, Z., Tierney, H., Fesenmaier, D.R., Law, R. (2010). Assessing the Dynamics of Search Results in Google. In: Gretzel, U., Law, R., Fuchs, M. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2010. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99407-8_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics