Skip to main content

Image Feature Selection for Market Segmentation: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery
  • 5277 Accesses

Abstract

The selection of variables (e.g. socio-demographic or psychographic descriptors of consumers, their buying intentions, buying frequencies, preferences) plays a decisive role in market segmentation. The inclusion as well as the exclusion of variables can influence the resulting classification decisively. Whereas this problem is always of importance it becomes overwhelming when customers should be grouped on the basis of describing images (e.g. photographs showing holidays experiences, usually bought products), as the number of potentially relevant image features is huge. In this paper we apply several general-purpose approaches to this problem: the heuristic variable selection by Carmone et al. (1999) and Brusco and Cradit (2001) as well as the model-based approach by Raftery and Dean (2004). We combine them with k-means, fuzzy c-means, and latent class analysis for comparisons in a Monte Carlo setting with an image database where the optimal market segmentation is already known.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Further information concerning the ARI can be found in Sect. 3.1.

References

  • Baier, D., & Daniel, I. (2012). Image clustering for marketing purposes. In Challenges at the interface of data analysis, computer science, and optimization. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e. V., Karlsruhe, July 21-23, 2010 (pp. 487–494). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, D., Daniel, I., Frost, S., & Naundorf, R. (2012). Image data analysis and classification in marketing. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 6(4), 253–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, M. J., & Cradit, J. D. (2001). A variable-selection heuristic for K-means clustering. Psychometrika, 66, 249–270.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carmone, F. J., Kara, A., & Maxwell, S. (1999). HINoV: A new model to improve market segment definition by identifying noisy variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzichristofis, S. A., & Boutalis, Y. S. (2008a). CEDD: Color and edge directivity descriptor. A compact descriptor for image indexing and retrieval. In ICVS’08 6th International Conference on Computer Vision Systems (pp. 312–322), Santorini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzichristofis, S. A., & Boutalis, Y. S. (2008b). FCTH: Fuzzy color and texture histogram – A low level feature for accurate image retrieval. In WIAMIS’08 9th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (pp. 191–196), Klagenfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Bimbo, A. (1999). Visual information retrieval. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. Wiley Series in probability and statistics: Probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193–218. Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E., & Dean, N. (2004). Variable Selection for Model-Based Clustering. Technical Report No. 452, Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, W. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 846–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. G., & Stockman, G. C. (2001). Computer vision. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, H., Mori, S., & Yamakawi, T. (1978). Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8(6), 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, A. (1994). Market segmentation. Using demographics, psychographics and other niche marketing techniques to predict and model consumer behaviour. Burr Ridge: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. D., & Tiggert, D. J. (1971). Activities, interests and opinions. Journal of Advertising Research, 11(4), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Rumstadt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rumstadt, S., Baier, D. (2014). Image Feature Selection for Market Segmentation: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches. In: Spiliopoulou, M., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Janning, R. (eds) Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01595-8_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics