Skip to main content

Trust and Reputation Models for Quality Assessment of Human Sensor Observations

  • Conference paper
Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8116))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the rise of human sensor observation as a major source of geospatial information, the traditional assessment of information quality based on parameters like accuracy, consistency and completeness is shifting to new measures. In volunteered geographic information (VGI) these conventional parameters are either lacking or not explicit. Regarding human observation quality as fitness for purpose, we propose to use trust and reputation as proxy measures of it. Trustworthy observations then take precedence over less trustworthy observations. Further, we propose that trust and reputation have spatial and temporal dimensions and we build computational models of trust for quality assessment including these dimensions. We present the case study of the H2.0 VGI project for water quality management. Through agent based modeling, the study has established the validity of a spatio-temporal trust model for assessing the trustworthiness and hence the quality of human observations. We first introduce a temporally sensitive trust model and then discuss the extension of the temporal model with spatial dimensions and their effects on the computational trust model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bishr, M., Kuhn, W.: Geospatial information bottom-up: A matter of trust and semantics. In: 10th Agile Conference, pp. 365–387. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn, W.: Volunteered geographic information and giscience, pp. 13–14. NCGIA, UC Santa Barbara (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodchild, M.F.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4), 211–221 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knowles, D.: Twitter message sparks big rescue effort, http://www.aolnews.com/tech/article/twitter-message-sparks-big-rescue-effort-in-haiti/19337648 (February 20, 2012)

  5. Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., Gorman, S.: Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy 2(2), 2 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodchild, M.F., Glennon, J.A.: Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth 3(3), 231–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sztompka, P.: Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsch, M.: Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 10, pp. 275–319. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buskens, V.W.: Social networks and trust. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luhmann, N.: Trust and Power. John Wiley and Sons (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gambetta, D.: Can We Trust Trust? In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Golbeck, J.: Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks. PhD thesis (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nohria, N., Eccles, R.G.: Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Harvard Business School Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lyons, B.: Contracts and specific investment: An empirical test of transaction cost theory. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 3(2), 257–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz, E.: Neither Friends nor Strangers: Informal Networks of Subcontracting in French Industry. In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Basil Blackwell, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liben-Nowell, D., Novak, J., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Tomkins, A.: Geographic routing in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(33), 11623 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fogg, B., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: the CHI is the Limit, pp. 80–87. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Hawkins, D.T.: What is credible information? Online (Weston, CT) 23(5), 86–89 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Z.: Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the web. Information Processing and Management 40(6), 1027–1038 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Metzger, M.J.: Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(13), 2078 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rieh, S.Y., Danielson, D.: Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41, 307–364 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bishr, M., Mantelas, L.: A trust and reputation model for filtering and classifying knowledge about urban growth. GeoJournal 72(3), 229–237 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gray, E., Seigneur, J.-M., Chen, Y., Jensen, C.: Trust propagation in small worlds. In: Nixon, P., Terzis, S. (eds.) iTrust 2003. LNCS, vol. 2692, pp. 239–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Guha, R., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Tomkins, A.: Propagation of trust and distrust. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 403–412. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Mezzetti, N.: A socially inspired reputation model. In: Katsikas, S.K., Gritzalis, S., López, J. (eds.) EuroPKI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3093, pp. 191–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodchild, M.F., Gopal, S.: The accuracy of spatial databases. Taylor and Francis (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mülligann, C., Janowicz, K., Ye, M., Lee, W.-C.: Analyzing the spatial-semantic interaction of points of interest in volunteered geographic information. In: 10th Conference on Spatial Information Theory, pp. 350–370 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ostermann, F.O., Spinsanti, L.: A conceptual workflow for automatically assessing the quality of volunteered geographic information for crisis management. In: Proceedings of AGILE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marsh, S.: Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. PhD thesis (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cheskin, S.: ecommerece trust: Building trust in digital environments. Archetype/Sapient (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walter, F., Battiston, S., Schweitzer, F.: A model of a trust-based recommendation system on a social network. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16(1), 57–74 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mayer, R., Davis, J., Schoorman, F.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jürrens, E.H.: Swe-connection to a gsm-interface to establish water availability monitoring in africa. Master’s thesis, Institute for Geoinformatics, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489), 1390–1396 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Krugman, P.: Development, geography, and economic theory. MIT Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bishr, M.: Trust and reputation models for human sensor observations. PhD thesis (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.: On the variability of human activity spaces. Place Zurich (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Newsome, T.H., Walcott, W.A., Smith, P.D.: Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions. Transportation 25(4), 357–377 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bishr, M., Kuhn, W. (2013). Trust and Reputation Models for Quality Assessment of Human Sensor Observations. In: Tenbrink, T., Stell, J., Galton, A., Wood, Z. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01789-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01790-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics