Abstract
We analyze from a semi-formal perspective the grounding model of cultural transmission, a social psychological theory that emphasizes the role of everyday joint activities in the transmission of cultural information. The model postulates that cultural transmission during joint activities depends on the context of the activity and the common ground that participants perceive. We build on a framework of intelligent agents that are able to engage in joint activities and integrate the process of communication as described by the grounding model of cultural transmission. We rely on stereotypes as a type of cultural information to illustrate how our model contributes to bridging the gap between micro- and macro-levels in research on cultural dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Note that while our formalism is not an attempt at describing the production of low-level utterances, we artificially construct dialogues whose utterances do fit the abstract level of mental alignment we address here.
- 2.
We disregard the actual communication language and its formal semantics here to facilitate comprehensibility.
- 3.
We omit here any information that is not relevant for our discussion, for example, that Gary is playing for Alice’s club.
References
Axelrod, R.: The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(2), 203–226 (1997)
Boyd, D., Richerson, P.J.: Culture and Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1985)
Bratman, M.E.: Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review 101, 327–341 (1992)
Castelfranchi, C.: Modelling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence 103(1–2), 157–182 (1998)
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81(2), 591–646 (2009)
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Feldman, M.W.: Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1981)
Clark, A.E., Kashima, Y.: Stereotype consistent information helps people connect with others: Situated-functional account of stereotype communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93, 1028–1039 (2007)
Clark, H.H.: Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1996)
Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Teamwork. Nous, Special Issue on Cognitive Science and AI 25(4), 487–512 (1991)
Dawkins, R.: The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1976)
Dunin-Keplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Collective intentions. Fundamenta Informaticae 51(3), 271–295 (2002)
Gilbert, D.T., Krull, D.S., Malone, P.S.: Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 601–613 (1990)
Gilbert, D.T., Tafarodi, R.W., Malone, P.S.: You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 221–233 (1993)
Gilbert, N.: Agent-based models. Sage Publications, London, UK (2008)
Goldstone, R.L., Janssen, M.A.: Computational models of collective behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(9), 424–430 (2005)
Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, NY (1975)
Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence 86(2), 269–357 (1996)
Kashima, Y.: Conceptions of culture and person for psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31, 14–32 (2000)
Kashima, Y., Klein, O., Clark, A.E.: Grounding: Sharing information in social interaction. In: Fiedler, K. (ed.) Social Communication, pp. 27–77. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA (2008)
Kashima, Y., Woolcock, J., Kashima, E.S.: Group impressions as dynamic configurations: The tensor product model of group impression formation and change. Psychological Review 107(4), 914–942 (2000)
Levinson, S.C.: Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1983)
Lyons, A., Kashima, Y.: How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(6), 989–1005 (2003)
Maxwell, D.T., Carley, K.M.: Principles for effectively representing heterogeneous populations in multi-agent simulations. In: Tolk, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Complex Systems in Knowledge-based Environments: Theory, Models and Applications, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 168, pp. 199–228. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Queller, S., Smith, E.R.: Subtyping versus bookkeeping in stereotype learning and change: Connectionist simulations and empirical findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(3), 300–313 (2002)
Rich, C., Sidner, C.L., Lesh, N.: Collagen: Applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction. AI magazine 22(4), 15–26 (2001)
Searle, J.R.: Collective intentions and actions. In: Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., Pollack, M.E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, chap. 19, pp. 401–415. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1990)
Smith, E.R., DeCoster, J.: Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: Simulation with a recurrent connectionist network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(1), 21–35 (1998)
Smith, E.R., Collins, E.C.: Contextualizing person perception: Distributed social cognition. Psychological Review 116(2), 343–364 (2009)
Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2nd edn. (1995)
Subramanian, R.A., Kumar, S., Cohen, P.R.: Integrating joint intention theory, belief reasoning, and communicative action for generating team-oriented dialogue. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-first National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 1501–1506. AAAI Press (2006)
Tambe, M.: Agent architectures for flexible, practical teamwork. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 22–28 (1997)
Traum, D.R.: A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester (1994)
Tuomela, R.: Joint intention, we-mode and i-mode. Midwest Studies In Philosophy 30(1), 35–58 (2006)
Van Overwalle, F., Heylighen, F.: Talking Nets: A multiagent connectionist approach to communication and trust between individuals. Psychological Review 113(3), 606–627 (2006)
Van Rooy, D.: Modeling multidirectional, dynamic social influences in social networks. In: Anderssen, R.S., Braddock, R.D., Newham, L.T.H. (eds.) MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (2009)
Van Rooy, D., Van Overwalle, F., Vanhoomissen, T., Labiouse, C., French, R.: A recurrent connectionist model of group biases. Psychological Review 110(3), 536–563 (2003)
Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2nd edn. (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfau, J., Kashima, Y., Sonenberg, L. (2014). Towards Agent-Based Models of Cultural Dynamics: A Case of Stereotypes. In: Dignum, V., Dignum, F. (eds) Perspectives on Culture and Agent-based Simulations. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01952-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01952-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01951-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01952-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)