Skip to main content

Web Browsing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality of Experience

Abstract

The Chapter provides an overview of Quality of Experience research for web-browsing, highlighting recent research trends. It indicates how Web-QoE assessment has evolved from the mapping of technically measured page-load times to quality estimates to the notion of perceived page-load time. Here, the consideration of the user’s current task and respective role of individual element load times is discussed. The interactive nature of web-browsing is further analyzed in terms of temporal effects regarding the subsequent page access of users during typical browsing sessions. Finally, the chapter provides an outlook on future challenges related with the increasing complexity of web-services and respective page-loading processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that we use the term time when we address physically measured time as well as perceived time. However, in some cases the term duration may be more appropriate, for example for addressing the duration of a stimulus or in general perceived duration.

References

  1. Ager B, Mühlbauer W, Smaragdakis G, Uhlig S (2011) Web content cartography. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM internet measurement conference, IMC ’11. ACM, New York, pp 585–600. doi:10.1145/2068816.2068870

  2. Bhatti N, Bouch A, Kuchinsky A (2000) Integrating user-perceived quality into web server design. In: Proceedings of the 9th international World Wide Web conference on computer networks : the international journal of computer and telecommunications netowrking. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp 1–16. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=347319.346245

  3. Butkiewicz M, Madhyastha HV, Sekar V (2011) Understanding website complexity: measurements, metrics, and implications. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on internet measurement conference, IMC ’11. ACM, New York, pp 313–328. doi:10.1145/2068816.2068846

  4. Egger S, Reichl P, Hoßfeld T, Schatz R (2012) ‘Time is bandwidth’? Narrowing the gap between subjective time perception and quality of experience. In: IEEE ICC 2012—communication QoS, reliability and modeling symposium (ICC’12 CQRM), Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  5. Egger S, Reichl P, Hoßfeld T, Schatz R (2012) Time is bandwidth? Narrowing the gap between subjective time perception and quality of experience. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC 2012). IEEE, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fiedler M, Hoßfeld T, Tran-Gia P (2010) A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. Netw IEEE 24(2):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galletta DF, Henry RM, McCoy S, Polak P (2006) When the wait isn’t so bad: the interacting effects of website delay, familiarity, and breadth. Inf Syst Res 17(1):20–37. doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomez Inc (2011) When seconds count: national consumer survey on websites and mobile performance expectations. http://www.gomez.com/wp-content/downloads/GomezWebSpeedSurvey.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2012

  9. Hoßfeld T, Schatz R, Biedermann S, Platzer A, Egger S, Fiedler M (2011) The memory effect and its implications on web QoE modeling. In: 23rd international teletraffic congress (ITC 2011), San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Study group 12, Question 13 (Q13.12) (2012) Work item quality of web browsing (G.QoE-Web). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/workprog/wp_item.aspx?isn=8208

  11. ITU Recommendation, ITU-T G.1030 (2005) Estimating end-to-end performance in IP networks for data applications. ITU Telecom, Standardization Sector of ITU, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kilkki K (2008) Quality of experience in communications ecosystem. J Univ Comput Sci 14(5):615–624

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niida S, Uemura S, Nakamura H (2010) Mobile services. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 5(3):61–67. doi:10.1109/MVT.2010.937850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poese I, Frank B, Ager B, Smaragdakis G, Feldmann A (2010) Improving content delivery using provider-aided distance information. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on internet measurement, IMC ’10. ACM, New York, pp 22–34. doi:10.1145/1879141.1879145. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1879141.1879145

  15. Reichl P, Egger S, Schatz R, D’Alconzo A (2010) The logarithmic nature of QoE and the role of the weber-fechner law in QoE assessment. In: Proceeding of the IEEE international communications conference (ICC), pp 1–5. IEEE, Cape Town. doi:10.1109/ICC.2010.5501894

  16. Schatz R, Hoßfeld T, Janowski L, Egger S (2012) From packets to people: quality of experience as new measurement challenge. In: Biersack E, Callegari C, Matijasevic M (eds) Data traffic monitoring and analysis: from measurement, classification and anomaly detection to quality of experience. Springers computer communications and networks series, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shaikh J, Fiedler M, Collange M (2010) Quality of experience from user and network perspectives. Ann Telecommun-annales des télécommunications 65(1–2):47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Strohmeier D, Jumisko-Pyykko S, Raake A (2012) Toward task-dependent evaluation of Web-QoE: free exploration vs. “who ate what?”. In: IEEE globecom workshops 2012, Anaheim, pp 1309–1313. doi:10.1109/GLOCOMW.2012.6477771

  19. Strohmeier D, Mikkola M, Raake A (2013) The importance of task completion times for modeling Web-QoE of consecutive web page requests. In: Proceeding of the Fifth international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX 2013), Klagenfurt

    Google Scholar 

  20. Technology Review (2011) The need for speed. http://www.technologyreview.com/files/54902/GoogleSpeed_charts.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Strohmeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strohmeier, D., Egger, S., Raake, A., Hoßfeld, T., Schatz, R. (2014). Web Browsing. In: Möller, S., Raake, A. (eds) Quality of Experience. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02680-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02681-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics