Skip to main content

The Role of Community Structure in Opinion Cluster Formation

  • Conference paper
Complex Sciences (Complex 2012)

Abstract

Opinion clustering arises from the collective behavior of a social network. We apply an Opinion Dynamics model to investigate opinion cluster formation in the presence of community structure. Opinion clustering is influenced by the properties of individuals (nodes) and network topology. We determine the sensitivity of opinion cluster formation to changes in node tolerance levels through parameter sweeps. We investigate the effect of network community structure through rewiring the network to lower the community structure. Tolerance variation modifies the effects of community structure on opinion clustering: higher values of tolerance lead to less distinct opinion clustering. Community structure is found to inhibit network wide clusters from forming. We claim that advancing understanding of the role of community structure in social networks can help lead to more informed and effective public health policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Smith, K.P., Christakis, N.A.: Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology 34, 405–429 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glass, L.M., Glass, R.J.: Social contact networks for the spread of pandemic influenza in children and teenagers. BMC Public Health 8(1), 61 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H.: The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine 357(4), 370 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore, T.W., Finley, P.D., Linebarger, J.M., Outkin, A.V., Verzi, S.J., Brodsky, N.S., Cannon, D.C., Zagonel, A.A., Glass, R.J.: Extending Opinion Dynamics to Model Public Health Problems and Analyze Public Policy Interventions. In: Eighth International Conference on Complex Systems, Quincy, MA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fowler, J.H., Christakis, N.A.: Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal 337(dec04 2), a2338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(12), 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1, 201–233 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27(1), 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colbaugh, R., Glass, K.: Predictive analysis for social diffusion: The role of network communities. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0912.5242 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cartwright, D., Harary, F.: Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory. Psychological Review 63(5) (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81(2), 591–646 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.P.: Meet, discuss, and segregate! Complexity 7(3), 55–63 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deffuant, G.: Comparing extremism propagation patterns in continuous opinion models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(3) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, T., Finley, P., Hammer, R., Glass, R.: Opinion dynamics in gendered social networks: An examination of female engagement teams in Afghanistan. Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, 69–77 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ballerini, M., Cabibbo, N., Candelier, R., Cavagna, A., Cisbani, E., Giardina, I., Lecomte, V., Orlandi, A., Parisi, G., Procaccini, A.: Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(4), 1232–1237 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I., Gutnick, D.L.: Cooperative organization of bacterial colonies: From genotype to morphotype. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 52(1), 779–806 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gautrais, J., Jost, C., Theraulaz, G.: Key behavioural factors in a self-organised fish school model. Annales Zoologici Fennici 45, 415–428 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., Theraulaz, G.: The walking behaviour of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics. PloS One 5(4), e10047 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salathé, M., Bonhoeffer, S.: The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 5(29), 1505–1508 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schelling, T.C.: Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(2), 143–186 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kozma, B., Barrat, A.: Consensus formation on adaptive networks. Phys. Rev. E 77(1) (January 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scott, J.: Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage Publications Ltd., London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H.: The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine 358(21), 2249 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., Xu, X.: A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, vol. 1996, pp. 226–231 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erdős, P., Rényi, A.: On the evolution of random graphs. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl 5, 17–61 (1960)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69(2), 026113 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hammer, R.J., Moore, T.W., Finley, P.D., Glass, R.J. (2013). The Role of Community Structure in Opinion Cluster Formation. In: Glass, K., Colbaugh, R., Ormerod, P., Tsao, J. (eds) Complex Sciences. Complex 2012. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 126. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03473-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03473-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03472-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03473-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics