Skip to main content

Statistical Analysis of Requirements Prioritization for Transition to Web Technologies: A Case Study in an Electric Power Organization

  • Conference paper
  • 1479 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 166))

Abstract

Transition from an existing IT system to modern Web technologies provides multiple benefits to an organization and its customers. Such a transition in a large organization involves various groups of stakeholders who may prioritize differently the requirements of the software under development. In our case study, the organization is a leading domestic company in the field of electricity power. The existing online system supports the customer service along with the technical activities and has more than 1,500 registered users, while simultaneous access can be reached by 300 users. The paper presents an empirical study where 51 employees in different roles prioritize 18 software requirements using hierarchical cumulative voting. The goal of this study is to test significant differences in prioritization between groups of stakeholders. Statistical methods involving data transformation, ANOVA and Discriminant Analysis were applied to data. The results showed significant differences between roles of the stakeholders in certain requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mayle, D., Bettley, A., Tantoush, T. (eds.): Operations management: A strategic approach. Sage Publications Limited (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leung, H.K.: Quality metrics for intranet applications. Information & Management 38(3), 137–152 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johansson, E., Wesslén, A., Bratthall, L., Host, M.: The importance of quality requirements in software platform development-a survey. In: The 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Offutt, J.: Quality attributes of Web software applications. IEEE Software 19(2), 25–32 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berntsson Svensson, R., Gorschek, T., Regnell, B., Torkar, R., Shahrokni, A., Feldt, R.: Quality Requirements in Industrial Practice—An Extended Interview Study at Eleven Companies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 38(4), 923–935 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips, L.B., Aurum, A., Svensson, R.B.: Managing Software Quality Requirements. In: The 38th EUROMICRO Conference in Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 349–356. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berander, P., Jönsson, P.: Hierarchical Cumulative Voting (HCV) -Prioritization of requirements in hierarchies. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 16(6), 819–849 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berander, P., Jönsson, P.: A goal question metric based approach for efficient measurement framework definition. In: The 2006 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2006), pp. 316–325. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Leffingwell, D., Widrig, D.: Managing software requirements: A Use Case Approach, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Regnell, B., Host, M., Natt och Dag, J., Beremark, P., Hjelm, T.: An industrial case study on distributed prioritisation in market-driven requirements engineering for packaged software. Requirements Eng. 6, 51–62 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Berander, P., Wohlin, C.: Difference in views between development roles in software process improvement – A quantitative comparison. In: Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karlsson, L.: Requirements prioritisation and retrospective analysis for release planning process improvement. PhD Thesis, Department of Communication Systems Lund Institute of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berander, P.: Evolving prioritization for software product management. Phd Thesis Department of Systems and Software Engineering School of Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chatzipetrou, P., Angelis, L., Barney, S., Wohlin, C.: Software product quality in global software development: Finding groups with aligned goals. In: The 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA 2011), pp. 435–442. IEEE Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aitchison, J.: The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. The Blackburn Press, London (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatzipetrou, P., Angelis, L., Rovegård, P., Wohlin, C.: Prioritization of Issues and Requirements by Cumulative Voting: A Compositional Data Analysis Framework. In: The 36th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA 2010), pp. 361–370. IEEE press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chatzipetrou, P., Papatheocharous, E., Angelis, L., Andreou, A.S.: An Investigation of Software Effort Phase Distribution Using Compositional Data Analysis. In: The 38th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA 2012), pp. 367–375. IEEE press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riņķevičs, K., Torkar, R.: Equality in cumulative voting: A systematic review with an improvement proposal. Information and Software Technology (2012), doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.08.004

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rovegard, P., Angelis, L., Wohlin, C.: An empirical study on views of importance of change impact analysis issues. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 34(4), 516–530 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robson, C.: Real World Research. Blackwell (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kotonya, G., Sommerville, I.: Requirements Engineering: processes and techniques. John Wiley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nuseibeh, B., Easterbrook, S.: Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering. ACM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aurum, A., Wohlin, C.: The fundamental nature of requirements engineering activities as a decision-making process. Information and Software Technology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eason, K.: Information Technology and Organisational Change. Taylor and Francis (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., Galal, G.: Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. In: Proceedings of 10th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. IEEE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Martín-Fernández, J.A., Barceló-Vidal, C., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.: Zero replacement in compositional data sets. In: Kiers, H., Rasson, J., Groenen, P., Shader, M. (eds.) The 7th Conference of the International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS 2000). Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, pp. 155–160. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Comas-Cufí, M., Thió-Henestrosa, S.: CoDaPack 2.0: a stand-alone, multi-platform compositional software. In: Egozcue, J.J., Tolosana-Delgado, R., Ortego, M.I. (eds.) The 4th International Workshop on Compositional Data Analysis (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Field, A.: Discovering statistics with SPSS. Sage, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krzanowski, W.J., Hand, D.J.: ROC curves for continuous data. Chapman & Hall/CRC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Charette, R.N.: Why software fails. IEEE Spectrum 42(9) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sumner, M.: Critical success factors in enterprise wide information management systems projects. In: The 1999 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, pp. 297–303. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Poon, P., Wagner, C.: Critical success factors revisited: success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives. Decision Support Systems 30(4), 393–418 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chatzipetrou, P., Karapiperis, C., Palampouiki, C., Angelis, L. (2014). Statistical Analysis of Requirements Prioritization for Transition to Web Technologies: A Case Study in an Electric Power Organization. In: Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Bergsmann, J. (eds) Software Quality. Model-Based Approaches for Advanced Software and Systems Engineering. SWQD 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 166. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03602-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03602-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03601-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03602-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics