Skip to main content

CityBench: A Geospatial Exploration of Comparable Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place

Abstract

In many city comparisons and benchmarking attempts, scores are purely one-dimensional with results split accordingly for each dimension. We propose a methodology for comparing cities on multiple dimensions implemented as a map-centric web tool based on a pairwise similarity measure. CityBench web tool provides a quick-scan geographical exploration of multidimensional similarity across European cities. With this dynamic method, the user may easily discover city peers that could face similar risks and opportunities and consequently develop knowledge networks and share best practices. This web tool is destined to provide economic/financing institutions’, local governments’ and policy makers’ in Europe and beyond decision making support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.espon.eu/main/

  2. 2.

    http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/

  3. 3.

    http://www.espon.eu/main/

  4. 4.

    http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/

  5. 5.

    http://jquery.com/

  6. 6.

    http://d3js.org/

  7. 7.

    (http://www.oecd.org/statistics/datalab/metro-explorer.htm)

References

  • Amelang J (2007) Comfigparing cities: a barcelona model? Urban History 34:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammons DN (1999) A proper mentality for benchmarking. Public Admistration Rev 59(2):105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby F, Ennis D (2007) Similarity measures. Scholarpedia 2(12):4116

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Longley P (1994a) Urban boundaries and edges. In: Batty M, Longley P (eds) Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 164–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Longley PA (1994b) Fractal cities: a Geometry of form and function. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum S (1997) Sydney, Australia: a global city? Testing the social polarisation Thesis. Urban Studies, pp 1881–1902

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaverstock JV, Hoyler M, Pain K et al (2001) Comparing London and Frankfurt as world cities: a relational study of contemporary urban change. Anglo-German Foundation for Study of Industrial Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berson A (1996) Client/Server architecture. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke B (2009) RESTful Java with JAX-RS. O’Reilly Media. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deza MM, Deza E (2013) Distances and similarities in data analysis. Encyclopedia of distances, pp 291–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra L, Poelman H (2012) Regional focus (RF 01/2012). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/focus/2012_01_city.pdf

  • EC (2004) Urban audit: methodological handbook. Office for Official Publications of the European Commission, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2007) Directive 2007/2/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 14 March 2007 establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the European community (INSPIRE). Official J Eur Union 50:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J (1986) The world city hypothesis. Development and change, 17:69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J (1995) Where we stand: a decade of world city research. World cities in a World-System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk NS (2004) The use of benchmarking in EU economic and social policies. In: Conference on the future of Europe. Odense, pp 24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (2009) Looking backward, looking forward:the city region of the mid-21st century. Reg Stud 43:803–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgason S (1997) International benchmarking:experiences from OECD countries. In: Procedings of the Danish ministry of finance conference on international benchmarking. The Stationery Office, Copenhagen, pp 20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway A, Wajzer C (2008) Improving city performance through benchmarking. In: International cities town centres & communities society conference, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Prabhakar S, Hong L et al (2000) Filterbank-based fingerprint matching. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(5):846–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasanko M, Barredo JI, Lavalle C et al (2006) Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape Urban Plan 77(1–2):111–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam EW, Chan AP, Chan DW (2010) Benchmarking success of building maintenance projects. Facilities 28(5/6):290–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanfranchi V, Ireson N (2009) User requirements for a collective intelligence emergency response system. In: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: celebrating people and technology. British Computer Society, pp 198–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman Abu-Lughod J (1995) Comparing Chicago, New York and Los Angeles: testing some world city hypotheses. In: Knox P, Taylor P (eds) World cities in a World system. p 171–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Duggan DJ, Chen Yidong SJ et al (2001) Advances in brief: human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: molecular dissection by gene expression profiling. Cancer Research, pp 4683–4688

    Google Scholar 

  • Luque-Martínez T, Muñoz-Leiva F (2005) City benchmarking: a methodological proposal referring specifically to Granada. Teodoro Luque-Martínez, Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, city benchmarking: a methodologCities 22(6):411–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Mane AV, Manza RR, Kale KV (2010) The role of similarity measures in face recognition. Int J Comput Sci Appl (1):62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin K (2009) Java web services: up and running. O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray S (2013) Interactivee data visualization for the web. O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez-Redó M, Díaz L, Gil J et al (2011) Discovery and integration of Web 2.0 content into geospatial information infrastructures: a use case in wild fire monitoring. Availability, reliability and security for business, enterprise and health, information systems, pp 50–68

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012) Redefining "Urban": a new way to measure metropolitan areas. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264174108-en

  • Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem, Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography Vol. 38 Geo Books, Norwich, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr J (2005) Perspectives on the city-region. Reg Stud 39:555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Cranshaw J, Yano T (2013) Exploring venue-based city-to-city similarity measures. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing. ACM, Chicago, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho CE, Hobbs RJ (2012) Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27(3):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager C (2003) European city benchmark study. Wonderful Copenhagen, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval J (2009) Master core REST concepts and create RESTful web services in java. Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth R, Covell M, Ravichandran D et al (2011) A tale of two (similar) cities-inferring city similarity through geo-spatial query log analysis. KDIR, pp 179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikos L (2011) Web standards: mastering HTML5, CSS3, and XML. Apress, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatnall A (2005) Web portals: the new gateways to internet information and services. Idea Group Inc (IGI)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ, Walker D (2001) World cities: a first multivariate analysis of their service complexes. Urban Stud 38:23–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Seik F (2000) Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997–1998). Habitat Int 24(1):31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulp JW (2012) Close votes. Retrieved Nov 15, 2013, from Tulp interactive: http://tulpinteractive.com

  • Turok I, Mykhnenko V (2007) The trajectories of European cities, 1960–2005. Cities 24(3):165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasanen A (2012) Functional polycentricity: examining metropolitan spatial structure through the connectivity of urban sub-centres. Urban Stud 49:3627–3644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolley T (2013) An investigation of the effect of the swamping phenomenon on several block procedures for multiple outliers in univariate smaples. Opne J Stat 3(5):229–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thankfully acknowledge the European Observatory for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON) for funding this research and the team effort from both colleagues at Geodan Amsterdam, the Netherlands and Universitat Jaume I (UJI) Castellon, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Kalinaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalinaki, E. et al. (2014). CityBench: A Geospatial Exploration of Comparable Cities. In: Huerta, J., Schade, S., Granell, C. (eds) Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03611-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics