Abstract
In many city comparisons and benchmarking attempts, scores are purely one-dimensional with results split accordingly for each dimension. We propose a methodology for comparing cities on multiple dimensions implemented as a map-centric web tool based on a pairwise similarity measure. CityBench web tool provides a quick-scan geographical exploration of multidimensional similarity across European cities. With this dynamic method, the user may easily discover city peers that could face similar risks and opportunities and consequently develop knowledge networks and share best practices. This web tool is destined to provide economic/financing institutions’, local governments’ and policy makers’ in Europe and beyond decision making support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
References
Amelang J (2007) Comfigparing cities: a barcelona model? Urban History 34:173–189
Ammons DN (1999) A proper mentality for benchmarking. Public Admistration Rev 59(2):105–109
Ashby F, Ennis D (2007) Similarity measures. Scholarpedia 2(12):4116
Batty M, Longley P (1994a) Urban boundaries and edges. In: Batty M, Longley P (eds) Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 164–198
Batty M, Longley PA (1994b) Fractal cities: a Geometry of form and function. Academic Press, San Diego
Baum S (1997) Sydney, Australia: a global city? Testing the social polarisation Thesis. Urban Studies, pp 1881–1902
Beaverstock JV, Hoyler M, Pain K et al (2001) Comparing London and Frankfurt as world cities: a relational study of contemporary urban change. Anglo-German Foundation for Study of Industrial Society, London
Berson A (1996) Client/Server architecture. McGraw-Hill, New York
Burke B (2009) RESTful Java with JAX-RS. O’Reilly Media. Inc.
Deza MM, Deza E (2013) Distances and similarities in data analysis. Encyclopedia of distances, pp 291–305
Dijkstra L, Poelman H (2012) Regional focus (RF 01/2012). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/focus/2012_01_city.pdf
EC (2004) Urban audit: methodological handbook. Office for Official Publications of the European Commission, Luxemburg
EC (2007) Directive 2007/2/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 14 March 2007 establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the European community (INSPIRE). Official J Eur Union 50:1–14
Friedmann J (1986) The world city hypothesis. Development and change, 17:69–83
Friedmann J (1995) Where we stand: a decade of world city research. World cities in a World-System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–47
Groenendijk NS (2004) The use of benchmarking in EU economic and social policies. In: Conference on the future of Europe. Odense, pp 24–25
Hall P (2009) Looking backward, looking forward:the city region of the mid-21st century. Reg Stud 43:803–817
Helgason S (1997) International benchmarking:experiences from OECD countries. In: Procedings of the Danish ministry of finance conference on international benchmarking. The Stationery Office, Copenhagen, pp 20–21
Holloway A, Wajzer C (2008) Improving city performance through benchmarking. In: International cities town centres & communities society conference, Sydney
Jain A, Prabhakar S, Hong L et al (2000) Filterbank-based fingerprint matching. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(5):846–859
Kasanko M, Barredo JI, Lavalle C et al (2006) Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape Urban Plan 77(1–2):111–130
Lam EW, Chan AP, Chan DW (2010) Benchmarking success of building maintenance projects. Facilities 28(5/6):290–305
Lanfranchi V, Ireson N (2009) User requirements for a collective intelligence emergency response system. In: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: celebrating people and technology. British Computer Society, pp 198–203
Lippman Abu-Lughod J (1995) Comparing Chicago, New York and Los Angeles: testing some world city hypotheses. In: Knox P, Taylor P (eds) World cities in a World system. p 171–191
Luo J, Duggan DJ, Chen Yidong SJ et al (2001) Advances in brief: human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: molecular dissection by gene expression profiling. Cancer Research, pp 4683–4688
Luque-Martínez T, Muñoz-Leiva F (2005) City benchmarking: a methodological proposal referring specifically to Granada. Teodoro Luque-Martínez, Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, city benchmarking: a methodologCities 22(6):411–423
Mane AV, Manza RR, Kale KV (2010) The role of similarity measures in face recognition. Int J Comput Sci Appl (1):62–65
Martin K (2009) Java web services: up and running. O’Reilly Media Inc.
Murray S (2013) Interactivee data visualization for the web. O’Reilly Media Inc.
Núñez-Redó M, Díaz L, Gil J et al (2011) Discovery and integration of Web 2.0 content into geospatial information infrastructures: a use case in wild fire monitoring. Availability, reliability and security for business, enterprise and health, information systems, pp 50–68
OECD (2012) Redefining "Urban": a new way to measure metropolitan areas. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264174108-en
Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem, Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography Vol. 38 Geo Books, Norwich, England
Parr J (2005) Perspectives on the city-region. Reg Stud 39:555–566
Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Cranshaw J, Yano T (2013) Exploring venue-based city-to-city similarity measures. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing. ACM, Chicago, pp 1–4
Ramalho CE, Hobbs RJ (2012) Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27(3):179–188
Sager C (2003) European city benchmark study. Wonderful Copenhagen, Copenhagen
Sandoval J (2009) Master core REST concepts and create RESTful web services in java. Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham
Seth R, Covell M, Ravichandran D et al (2011) A tale of two (similar) cities-inferring city similarity through geo-spatial query log analysis. KDIR, pp 179–189
Sikos L (2011) Web standards: mastering HTML5, CSS3, and XML. Apress, Berkeley
Tatnall A (2005) Web portals: the new gateways to internet information and services. Idea Group Inc (IGI)
Taylor PJ, Walker D (2001) World cities: a first multivariate analysis of their service complexes. Urban Stud 38:23–47
Tuan Seik F (2000) Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997–1998). Habitat Int 24(1):31–49
Tulp JW (2012) Close votes. Retrieved Nov 15, 2013, from Tulp interactive: http://tulpinteractive.com
Turok I, Mykhnenko V (2007) The trajectories of European cities, 1960–2005. Cities 24(3):165–182
Vasanen A (2012) Functional polycentricity: examining metropolitan spatial structure through the connectivity of urban sub-centres. Urban Stud 49:3627–3644
Woolley T (2013) An investigation of the effect of the swamping phenomenon on several block procedures for multiple outliers in univariate smaples. Opne J Stat 3(5):229–304
Acknowledgments
We thankfully acknowledge the European Observatory for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON) for funding this research and the team effort from both colleagues at Geodan Amsterdam, the Netherlands and Universitat Jaume I (UJI) Castellon, Spain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalinaki, E. et al. (2014). CityBench: A Geospatial Exploration of Comparable Cities. In: Huerta, J., Schade, S., Granell, C. (eds) Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03611-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03611-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03610-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03611-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)