Skip to main content

Requirements for Supporting Enterprise Interoperability in Dynamic Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Interoperability VI

Part of the book series: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences ((IESACONF,volume 7))

Abstract

Interoperability in enterprise systems is currently discussed from a system theoretic point of view. In the conceptual work described here, two special instances of systems theory are used as a basis allowing to detail requirements for interoperability in dynamic environments. Chaos Theory and Complex Adaptive Systems Theory focus on the description of properties of dynamic systems where the global system’s behavior cannot be determined by summing up behaviors of system parts. First a connection between enterprise systems and the theories are established. The theories are then used as a lens for analyzing and discussing initial requirements for a platform that supports interoperability in a dynamic context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    i.e. in a state of ongoing change.

References

  1. von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory—foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doumeingts, G., Ducq, Y., & Chen, D. (2009). System theory to support enterprise interoperability science base. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: ICE2009-Collaborative Innovation: Emerging Technologies, Environments and Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Naudet, Y., Guedria, W., & Chen, D. (2009). Systems science for enterprise interoperability. Proceedings of I-ESA Conference 2009, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ducq, Y., Chen, D., & Doumeingts, G. (2012). A contribution of system theory to sustainable enterprise interoperability science base. Computers in Industry, 63, 844–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dassisti, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Molina, A., Noran, O., Panetto, H., & Zdravković, M. (2013). Sustainability and interoperability: Two facets of the same gold medal. In Y. Demey, & H. Panetto (Eds.). On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops, (LNCS, vol. 8186), Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weichhart, G., Hämmerle, A., & Fessl, K. (2002). Service-oriented concept of a holonic enterprise—enabling adaptive networks along the value chain. Proceedings of 5th IEEE/IFIP International conference on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems in Manufacturing and Services (BASYS), Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ackoff, RL. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–67.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Senge, P. (1995). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weichhart, G. (2013). The learning environment as a chaotic and complex adaptive system. Connecting Matter, Life, Culture and Technology 1(1), 36–53. http://www.systems-journal.eu/article/view/130/138

  12. Hite, J. A. (1999). Learning in chaos—improving human performance in today’s fast-changing, volatile organizations, houston. Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10, 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bandura, A. (1986). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development. Six Theories of Child Development. (vol. 6, pp.1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Novak, JD., & Cañas, AJ. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC), 2008. http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryCmaps/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.htm

  17. Weichhart, G. (2013). Supporting interoperability for chaotic and complex adaptive enterprise systems. In YT Demey & H. Panetto. (Eds.) OTM 2013 Workshops, (LNCS, vol. 8186, pp. 86–92), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naudet, Y., Latour, T., Guedria, W., & Chen, D. (2010). Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability, Computers in Industry 61, 176–185, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vernadat, FB. (2001). UEML: Towards a unified enterprise modelling language. Proceedings of the 3éConference Francophone de Modelisation et Simulation (MOSI-M’01).

    Google Scholar 

  20. IDS Scheer AG. (2000). Handbuch zur ARIS-Methode, Version 5, SaarbrĂĽcken.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vernadat, FB. (2002) Enterprise Modeling and Integration (EMI): Current status and research perspectives. Annual Reviews in Control 26, 5–25, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oppl, S., & Stary, C. (2013). Facilitating shared understanding of work situations using a tangible tabletop interface. Behavior & Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Quartel, D., Proper, E., & Iacob, M-E. (2011). ArchiMate(R) for integrated modelling throughout the architecture development and implementation cycle. In 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), 2011. (pp. 294–301).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weichhart, G., Feiner, T., & Stary, C. (2010). Implementing organisational interoperability—the sudden approach. Computers in Industry, 61, 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partly funded by the European Commission through the Project Marie Curie—Industry and Academia Partnerships and Pathways (IAPP) program project: IANES (Grant Agreement No. 286083). The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission for their support. For more information on the IANES project see http://www.ianes.eu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Weichhart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weichhart, G. (2014). Requirements for Supporting Enterprise Interoperability in Dynamic Environments. In: Mertins, K., Bénaben, F., Poler, R., Bourrières, JP. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VI. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04947-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04948-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics