Abstract
Interoperability in enterprise systems is currently discussed from a system theoretic point of view. In the conceptual work described here, two special instances of systems theory are used as a basis allowing to detail requirements for interoperability in dynamic environments. Chaos Theory and Complex Adaptive Systems Theory focus on the description of properties of dynamic systems where the global system’s behavior cannot be determined by summing up behaviors of system parts. First a connection between enterprise systems and the theories are established. The theories are then used as a lens for analyzing and discussing initial requirements for a platform that supports interoperability in a dynamic context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
i.e. in a state of ongoing change.
References
von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory—foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
Doumeingts, G., Ducq, Y., & Chen, D. (2009). System theory to support enterprise interoperability science base. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: ICE2009-Collaborative Innovation: Emerging Technologies, Environments and Communities.
Naudet, Y., Guedria, W., & Chen, D. (2009). Systems science for enterprise interoperability. Proceedings of I-ESA Conference 2009, Beijing.
Ducq, Y., Chen, D., & Doumeingts, G. (2012). A contribution of system theory to sustainable enterprise interoperability science base. Computers in Industry, 63, 844–857.
Dassisti, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Molina, A., Noran, O., Panetto, H., & Zdravković, M. (2013). Sustainability and interoperability: Two facets of the same gold medal. In Y. Demey, & H. Panetto (Eds.). On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops, (LNCS, vol. 8186), Berlin: Springer.
Weichhart, G., Hämmerle, A., & Fessl, K. (2002). Service-oriented concept of a holonic enterprise—enabling adaptive networks along the value chain. Proceedings of 5th IEEE/IFIP International conference on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems in Manufacturing and Services (BASYS), Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ackoff, RL. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–67.
Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 351–366.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
Senge, P. (1995). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency.
Weichhart, G. (2013). The learning environment as a chaotic and complex adaptive system. Connecting Matter, Life, Culture and Technology 1(1), 36–53. http://www.systems-journal.eu/article/view/130/138
Hite, J. A. (1999). Learning in chaos—improving human performance in today’s fast-changing, volatile organizations, houston. Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.
Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10, 216–232.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development. Six Theories of Child Development. (vol. 6, pp.1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Novak, JD., & Cañas, AJ. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC), 2008. http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryCmaps/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.htm
Weichhart, G. (2013). Supporting interoperability for chaotic and complex adaptive enterprise systems. In YT Demey & H. Panetto. (Eds.) OTM 2013 Workshops, (LNCS, vol. 8186, pp. 86–92), Springer.
Naudet, Y., Latour, T., Guedria, W., & Chen, D. (2010). Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability, Computers in Industry 61, 176–185, Elsevier.
Vernadat, FB. (2001). UEML: Towards a unified enterprise modelling language. Proceedings of the 3éConference Francophone de Modelisation et Simulation (MOSI-M’01).
IDS Scheer AG. (2000). Handbuch zur ARIS-Methode, Version 5, SaarbrĂĽcken.
Vernadat, FB. (2002) Enterprise Modeling and Integration (EMI): Current status and research perspectives. Annual Reviews in Control 26, 5–25, Elsevier.
Oppl, S., & Stary, C. (2013). Facilitating shared understanding of work situations using a tangible tabletop interface. Behavior & Information Technology.
Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Quartel, D., Proper, E., & Iacob, M-E. (2011). ArchiMate(R) for integrated modelling throughout the architecture development and implementation cycle. In 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), 2011. (pp. 294–301).
Weichhart, G., Feiner, T., & Stary, C. (2010). Implementing organisational interoperability—the sudden approach. Computers in Industry, 61, 152–160.
Acknowledgments
This work has been partly funded by the European Commission through the Project Marie Curie—Industry and Academia Partnerships and Pathways (IAPP) program project: IANES (Grant Agreement No. 286083). The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission for their support. For more information on the IANES project see http://www.ianes.eu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Weichhart, G. (2014). Requirements for Supporting Enterprise Interoperability in Dynamic Environments. In: Mertins, K., Bénaben, F., Poler, R., Bourrières, JP. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VI. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04947-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04948-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)