Skip to main content

Support of Manufacture Enterprises Collaboration Through the Development of a Reference Ontology: A Contribution in Metrological Domain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Interoperability VI

Part of the book series: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences ((IESACONF,volume 7))

  • 1387 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, manufacturing environment is populated with computational information files and records with implicit knowledge, which integration has becoming a major problem to seamless computational integration. Moreover, most of these systems are heterogeneous, thus problems of interoperability are frequent and any collaborative environment becomes easily compromised. Ontologies constitute the set of concepts, axioms, and relationships that describes a domain of interest, contributing to harmonize the information flow within computational systems. The distributed and heterogeneous nature of the organizations, in particular networked enterprises, led to the development of different ontologies for the same or overlapping areas, resulting in non-interoperability. This has become the basis for research methodologies to support a reference ontology, contributing to the standardization and development of ontologies within enterprises and virtual network, providing interoperability properties to intelligent systems. This paper exposes how the MENTOR methodology assisted the development and use of a reference ontology in the field of metrology, contributing to manufacturing teams collaboration and systems’ integration. The aim is to maintain the different ontologies of each partner, providing networked enterprises with coherent interaction and unambiguous communication. The case study in the field of metrology demonstrates the proposed methodology benefits introduced at collaborative manufacturing level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. VDI 2206. (2004). Design methodology for mechatronic systems.Berlin: Beuth Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sarraipa, J., Silva, J., Jardim-Goncalves, R., & Monteiro, A. (2008). MENTOR—a methodology for enterprise reference ontology development. In 2008 4th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira, P. H. & Hocken, R. J. (2006). Characterization and compensation of dynamic errors of a scanning coordinate measuring machine. Precision Engineering, 30, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. http://www.inmetro.gov.br/metcientifica/vim/vimGum.asp

  5. Abran, A., & Sellami, A. (2002). Initial modelling of the measurement concepts in the ISO vocabulary of terms in metrology. In Proceedings of IWSM2002, Magdeburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Requicha, A. A. G., & Chan, S. C. (1986). Representation of geometric features, tolerances, and attributes in solid models based on constructive geometry. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation RA-2, 3, 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turner, J. U. (1990). Relative positioning of parts in assembly using mathematical programming. Computer-Aided Design, 22(7), 394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feng, S. C. (1996). A dimensional inspection planning activity model. Journal of Engineering Design and Automation, 2(4), 253–267 (Special issue on Tolerance and Metrology for Precision Manufacturing).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsai, J. C., Cutkosky, & M. R. (1997). Representation and reasoning of geometric tolerances in design. Cambridge Journals, 11(04), 325–341. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4203944

  10. Hong, Y. S., & Chang, T. -C. (2002). A comprehensive review of tolerancing research. International Journal of Production Research, 40(11), 2425–2460.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, X., Pasupathy, T. K., & Wilhelm R. (2006). Modeling and representation of geometric tolerances information in integrated measurement processes. Journal Computers in Industry, 57(4), 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 14598:2001. (2001). Software engineering—product evaluation. Genova, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 9126:2001. (2001). Software engineering—product quality. Genova, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Azuma, M. (2001). SQuaRE: The next generation of the ISO/IEC 9126 and 14598 International Standards series on software product quality. In Proceedings of European Software Control and Metrics (ESCOM), London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 25000:2005. (2001). Software engineering—software product quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)—guide to SQuaRE. Genova, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, H. M. (1999). Representing and reasoning about quality using enterprise models, PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Canada: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  17. García, F., Bertoa, M. F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruiz, F., Piatinni, M., & Genero, M. (2005). Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement. Information and Software Technology, 48, 631–644.

    Google Scholar 

  18. García, F., Bertoa, M. F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruiz, F., Piatinni, M., & Genero, M. (2008). Efective use of ontologies in software measurement. The knowledge engineering review, Vol. 00:0, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Drejer, A. (2003). Gudmundsson, Agnar Exploring the concept of multiple product development via an action research project. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(3), 208–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva, João P. M. A., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Monteiro, A. C., & Steiger-Garcao, A. (2004). Make the most of interoperability along PLC stages: A framework based on multilevel integration. DETC2004-57733, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jardim-Goncalves, R., Sarraipa, J., Agostinho, C., & Panetto, H. (2009). Knowledge framework for intelligent manufacturing systems. International Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12(3), 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fernandez, M., Gomez-Perez, A., & Juristo, N. (1997). METHONTOLOGY: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. In Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI (pp. 33–40). Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stumme, G., & Madche, A. (2001). FCA-Merge: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’01) (pp. 225–230). Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Noy, N. F., & Musen, M. A. (2003). The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6), 983-1024.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gangemi, A., Pisanelli, D. M., & Steve, G. (1999). An overview of the ONIONS project: Applying ontologies to the integration of medical terminologies. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 31, 183–220.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Uschold, M., & King, M. (1995). Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Proceedings IJCAI-95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nicola, A., et al. (2005). Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA) (pp. 655–664). Denmark, LNCS no. 3588, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João P. Mendonça .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costa, C.A., Mendonça, J.P. (2014). Support of Manufacture Enterprises Collaboration Through the Development of a Reference Ontology: A Contribution in Metrological Domain. In: Mertins, K., Bénaben, F., Poler, R., Bourrières, JP. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VI. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04947-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04948-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics