Abstract
Nowadays, manufacturing environment is populated with computational information files and records with implicit knowledge, which integration has becoming a major problem to seamless computational integration. Moreover, most of these systems are heterogeneous, thus problems of interoperability are frequent and any collaborative environment becomes easily compromised. Ontologies constitute the set of concepts, axioms, and relationships that describes a domain of interest, contributing to harmonize the information flow within computational systems. The distributed and heterogeneous nature of the organizations, in particular networked enterprises, led to the development of different ontologies for the same or overlapping areas, resulting in non-interoperability. This has become the basis for research methodologies to support a reference ontology, contributing to the standardization and development of ontologies within enterprises and virtual network, providing interoperability properties to intelligent systems. This paper exposes how the MENTOR methodology assisted the development and use of a reference ontology in the field of metrology, contributing to manufacturing teams collaboration and systems’ integration. The aim is to maintain the different ontologies of each partner, providing networked enterprises with coherent interaction and unambiguous communication. The case study in the field of metrology demonstrates the proposed methodology benefits introduced at collaborative manufacturing level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
VDI 2206. (2004). Design methodology for mechatronic systems.Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
Sarraipa, J., Silva, J., Jardim-Goncalves, R., & Monteiro, A. (2008). MENTOR—a methodology for enterprise reference ontology development. In 2008 4th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems.
Pereira, P. H. & Hocken, R. J. (2006). Characterization and compensation of dynamic errors of a scanning coordinate measuring machine. Precision Engineering, 30, 85–95.
Abran, A., & Sellami, A. (2002). Initial modelling of the measurement concepts in the ISO vocabulary of terms in metrology. In Proceedings of IWSM2002, Magdeburg, Germany.
Requicha, A. A. G., & Chan, S. C. (1986). Representation of geometric features, tolerances, and attributes in solid models based on constructive geometry. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation RA-2, 3, 156–166.
Turner, J. U. (1990). Relative positioning of parts in assembly using mathematical programming. Computer-Aided Design, 22(7), 394–400.
Feng, S. C. (1996). A dimensional inspection planning activity model. Journal of Engineering Design and Automation, 2(4), 253–267 (Special issue on Tolerance and Metrology for Precision Manufacturing).
Tsai, J. C., Cutkosky, & M. R. (1997). Representation and reasoning of geometric tolerances in design. Cambridge Journals, 11(04), 325–341. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4203944
Hong, Y. S., & Chang, T. -C. (2002). A comprehensive review of tolerancing research. International Journal of Production Research, 40(11), 2425–2460.
Zhao, X., Pasupathy, T. K., & Wilhelm R. (2006). Modeling and representation of geometric tolerances information in integrated measurement processes. Journal Computers in Industry, 57(4), 319–330.
ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 14598:2001. (2001). Software engineering—product evaluation. Genova, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.
ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 9126:2001. (2001). Software engineering—product quality. Genova, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.
Azuma, M. (2001). SQuaRE: The next generation of the ISO/IEC 9126 and 14598 International Standards series on software product quality. In Proceedings of European Software Control and Metrics (ESCOM), London, England.
ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 25000:2005. (2001). Software engineering—software product quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)—guide to SQuaRE. Genova, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.
Kim, H. M. (1999). Representing and reasoning about quality using enterprise models, PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Canada: University of Toronto.
García, F., Bertoa, M. F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruiz, F., Piatinni, M., & Genero, M. (2005). Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement. Information and Software Technology, 48, 631–644.
García, F., Bertoa, M. F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruiz, F., Piatinni, M., & Genero, M. (2008). Efective use of ontologies in software measurement. The knowledge engineering review, Vol. 00:0, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drejer, A. (2003). Gudmundsson, Agnar Exploring the concept of multiple product development via an action research project. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(3), 208–220.
Silva, João P. M. A., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Monteiro, A. C., & Steiger-Garcao, A. (2004). Make the most of interoperability along PLC stages: A framework based on multilevel integration. DETC2004-57733, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jardim-Goncalves, R., Sarraipa, J., Agostinho, C., & Panetto, H. (2009). Knowledge framework for intelligent manufacturing systems. International Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12(3), 281–293.
Fernandez, M., Gomez-Perez, A., & Juristo, N. (1997). METHONTOLOGY: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. In Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI (pp. 33–40). Stanford, California.
Stumme, G., & Madche, A. (2001). FCA-Merge: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’01) (pp. 225–230). Seattle, WA.
Noy, N. F., & Musen, M. A. (2003). The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6), 983-1024.
Gangemi, A., Pisanelli, D. M., & Steve, G. (1999). An overview of the ONIONS project: Applying ontologies to the integration of medical terminologies. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 31, 183–220.
Uschold, M., & King, M. (1995). Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Proceedings IJCAI-95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, Canada.
Nicola, A., et al. (2005). Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA) (pp. 655–664). Denmark, LNCS no. 3588, Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Costa, C.A., Mendonça, J.P. (2014). Support of Manufacture Enterprises Collaboration Through the Development of a Reference Ontology: A Contribution in Metrological Domain. In: Mertins, K., Bénaben, F., Poler, R., Bourrières, JP. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VI. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04947-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04948-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)