Skip to main content

Abstract

We generate requirements for time-critical distributed team support relevant for domains such as disaster response. We present the Radiation Response Game to investigate socio-technical issues regarding team coordination. Field responders in this mixed-reality game use smartphones to coordinate, via text messaging, GPS, and maps, with headquarters and each other. We conduct interaction analysis to examine field observations and log data, revealing how teams achieve local and remote coordination and maintain situational awareness. We uncover requirements that highlight the role of local coordination, decision-making resources, geospatial referencing and message handling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.orchid.ac.uk/

  2. 2.

    http://mapattack.org/

References

  1. Abbasi M-A, Kumar S, Filho JAA, Liu H (2012) Lessons learned in using social media for disaster relief—ASU crisis response game. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on social comp, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction. Springer, Berlin, pp 282–289

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benford S, Magerkurth C, Ljungstrand P (2005) Bridging the physical and digital in pervasive gaming. CACM 48(3):54–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borge M, Ganoe CH, Shih S-I, Carroll JM (2012) Patterns of team processes and breakdowns in information analysis tasks. In: Proceedings of CSCW’12. ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradshaw JM, Feltovich PJ, Johnson M (2011) Human-agent interaction. In: Boy GA (ed) The handbook of human-machine interaction: a human-centred design approach. Ashgate Publishing Company, Surrey, pp 283–299

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen R, Sharman R, Rao HR, Upadhyaya SJ (2005) Design principles of coordinated multi-incident emergency response systems. Simulation 3495:177–202

    Google Scholar 

  6. Convertino G, Mentis HM, Slavkovic A, Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2011) Supporting common ground and awareness in emergency management planning. ToCHI 18(4):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crabtree A, Benford S, Rodden T, Greenhalgh C, Flintham M, Anastasi R, Drozd A, Adams M, Row-Farr J, Tandavanitj N, Steed A (2004) Orchestrating a mixed reality game ‘on the ground’. In: Proceedings of CHI’04. ACM Press, pp 391–398

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crabtree A, Benford S, Greenhalgh C, Tennent P, Chalmers M, Brown B (2006) Supporting ethnographic studies of ubiquitous computing in the wild. In: Proceedings of DIS’06. ACM Press, pp 60–69

    Google Scholar 

  9. Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S (2009) Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. Brit J Soc Psychol Brit Psychol Soc 48(3):487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer JE, Flintham M, Price D, Goulding J, Pantidi N, Rodden T (2012) Serious mixed reality games. In: Mixed reality games. Workshop at ACM CSCW 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flintham M, Benford S, Anastasi R, Hemmings T, Crabtree A, Greenhalgh C, Tandavanitj N, Adams M, Row-Farr J (2003) Where on-line meets on the streets: experiences with mobile mixed reality games. In: Proceedings of CHI’03. ACM Press, pp 569–576

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hawe GI, Coates G, Wilson DT, Crouch RS (2012) Agent-based simulation for large-scale emergency response. ACM Comput Surv 45(1):1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heath C, Hindmarsh J, Luff P (2010) Video in qualitative research. Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Homeland Security (2008) National Incident Management System (NIMS)

    Google Scholar 

  15. INSARAG (International Search and Rescue Advisory Group) (2012) Assessment, search and coordination methodologies. INSARAG Technical Note, United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jordan B, Henderson A (1995) Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. J Learn Sci 4(1):39–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee YM, Ghosh S, Ettl M (2009) Simulating distribution of emergency relief supplies for disaster response operations. In: Proceedings of winter simulation conference, pp 2797–2808

    Google Scholar 

  18. Losh E (2007) The birth of the virtual clinic. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on video games—Sandbox’07. ACM Press, pp 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malone TW, Crowston K (1990) What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In: Proceedings of CSCW’90. ACM Press, pp 357–370

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mendonça D, Jefferson T, Harrald J (2007) Collaborative adhocracies and mix-and-match technologies in emergency management. Commun ACM 50(3):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan American Health Organization (2001) Stresss management in disasters, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ramchurn S, Polukarov M, Farinelli A (2010) Coalition formation with spatial and temporal constraints. In: Proceedings of AAMAS’10, IFAAMAS

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson CD, Brown DE (2005) First responder information flow simulation: a tool for technology assessment, pp 919–925

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sarcevic A, Palen L, White J, Starbird K, Bagdouri M, Anderson K (2012) “Beacons of hope” in decentralized coordination. In: Proceedings of CSCW’12. ACM Press, pp 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  25. Searle JR (1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In: Günderson K (ed) Language, mind, and knowledge. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis, pp 344–369

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simonovic SP (2009) Systems approach to management of disasters: methods and applications. In: Disaster prevention and management, vol 20. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stenros J, Montola M, Waern A (2009) Pervasive game design strategies. Pervasive games: theories and design. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Toups ZO, Kerne A, Hamilton W (2009) Game design principles for engaging cooperative play: core mechanics and interfaces for non-mimetic simulation of fire emergency response. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH games 2009. ACM Press, pp 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  29. Toups ZO, Kerne A, Hamilton WA (2011) The team coordination game. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 18(4):1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support by the EPSRC ORCHID project (EP/I011587/1). Thanks to the University of Nottingham’s Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute for support provided by a sabbatical grant to the third author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel E. Fischer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fischer, J.E. et al. (2014). Supporting Team Coordination on the Ground: Requirements from a Mixed Reality Game. In: Rossitto, C., Ciolfi, L., Martin, D., Conein, B. (eds) COOP 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27-30 May 2014, Nice (France). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06497-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06498-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics