Abstract
Creating social ties are important for collaborative work; however, in geographically distributed organizations e.g. global software development, making social ties requires extra work: Relation work. We find that characteristics of relation work as based upon shared history and experiences, emergent in personal and often humorous situations. Relation work is intertwined with other activities such as articulation work and it is rhythmic by following the work patterns of the participants. By comparing how relation work is conducted in collocated and geographically distributed settings we in this paper identify basic differences in relation work. Whereas collocated relation work is spontaneous, place-centric, and yet mobile, relation work in a distributed setting is semi-spontaneous, technology-mediated, and requires extra efforts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Avram G, Bannon L, Bowers J, Sheehan A (2009) Bridging, patching and keeping the work flowing: defect resolution in distributed software development. Comput Support Coop Work Int J 18:477–507
Bjørn P (2011) Co‐constructing globally collaborative spaces and places: an ethnographic study of how globally distributed engineers handle planning practice. In: Scandinavian conference information systems SCIS. Springer, Turku, Finland
Bjørn P, Bardram J, Avram G, Bannon L, Boden A, Redmiles D, Souza C, Wulf V (2014) Global software development in a CSCW perspective. Workshop paper in computer supported cooperative work and social computing (CSCW), ACM, Baltimore, USA
Bjørn P, Christensen LR (2011) Relation work: creating socio-technical connections in global engineering. In: European conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW). Kluwer Academic, Aarhus, Denmark, pp 133–152
Bjørn P, Ngwenyama O (2009) Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Inf Syst J 19(3):227–253
Bjørn P, Ngwenyama O (2010) Technology alignment: a new area in virtual team research. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 53(4):382–400
Boden A, Nett B, Wulf V (2009) Trust and social capital: revisiting an offshoring failure story of a small German software company. In: European conference computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW’09), H.T. Ina Wagner, Ellen Balka, Carla Simone (ed.), Kluwer, Vienna, Austria
Blomberg J, Karasti H (2013) Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Comput Support Coop Work Int J 22:373–423
Boulus N, Bjørn P (2007) Constructing technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaption in Canada and Norway. In: 3rd International conference information technology in healthcare: socio-technical approaches. IOS Press, Sidney, Australia, pp 143–155
Bradner E, Mark G (2002) Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. In: CSCW, ACM, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 226–235
Christensen L, Bjørn P (2014) Documentscape: intertextuality, sequentiality and autonomy at work. In: ACM CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Toronto, ON, Canada
Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ Sci 12(3):346–371
Cramton CD, Hinds P (2005) Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocenterism or cross-national learning. Res Org Behav 26:233–265
Erickson T, Kellogg WA (2000) Social translucence: an approach to the designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7(1):59–83
Grinter R (2003) Recomposition: coordinating a web of software dependencies. Comput Support Coop Work Int J 12:297–327
Gutwin C, Penner R, Schneider K (2004) Group awareness in distributed software development. Comput Support Coop Work. ACM, New York, NY, USA
Harrison S, Tatar D (2008) Places: people, events, loci—the relations of semantic frames in the construction of place. Comput Support Coop Work Int J 17:97–133
Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Org Sci 10(6):791–815
Jensen RE, Bjørn P (2012) Divergence and convergence in global software development: Cultural complextities as societal structures. In: COOP: design of cooperative systems. Springer, France, pp 123–136
Kiesler S, Cummings JN (2002) What Do we know about proximity and distance in work groups: a legacy of research. In: Hinds P, Kiesler S (eds) Distributed work. MIT Press, MAS, pp 57–83
Kotlarsky J, Oshri I (2005) Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. Eur J Inf Syst 14(1):37–48
Matthiesen S, Bjørn P, Petersen L (2014) ‘Figure out to code with the hands of others’: recognizing cultural blind spots in global software development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Baltimore, USA, 2014
Nardi B (2005) Beyond bandwidth: dimensions of connections in interpersonal communication. Comput Support Coop Work Int J 14:91–130
Nardi B, Whittaker S, Schwarz H (2002) NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. Comput Support Coop Work Int J 11:205–242
O’Neill J, Martin D, Colobino T, Grasso A (2011) When a little knowledge isn’t a dangerous thing. In: ACM CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, Canada
Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Hum Comput Interact 15:139–178
Oshri I, Van Fenema P, Kotlarsky J (2008) Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory. Inf Syst J 18(6):593–616
Schmidt K (1998) The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW. In: Heath C, Hindmarsh J, Luff P (eds) Workplace studies, recovering work practices and informing design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schmidt K, Bannon L (1992) Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work. Comput Support Coop Work Int J 1(1–2):7–40
Søderberg A-M, Krishna S, Bjørn P (2013) Global software development: commitment, trust and cultural sensitivity in strategic partnerships. J Int Manag 19(4):347–361
Strauss A (1985) Work and the division of labor. Sociol Q 26(1):1–19
Strauss A (1988) The articulation of project work: an organizational process. Sociol Q 29(2):163–178
Wasko M, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Q 29(1):35–57
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press
Acknowledgements
This research has been funded by the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation under the project “Next Generation Technology for Global Software Development”, #10-092313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Christensen, L.R., Jensen, R.E., Bjørn, P. (2014). Relation Work in Collocated and Distributed Collaboration. In: Rossitto, C., Ciolfi, L., Martin, D., Conein, B. (eds) COOP 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27-30 May 2014, Nice (France). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06497-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06498-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)