Skip to main content

An Empirical Account of Fitness-Utility: A Case of Radical Change towards Mobility in DSR Practice

  • Conference paper
Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice (DESRIST 2014)

Abstract

Evaluation is an essential part of design science research - a means to demonstrate qualities of artefacts and knowledge abstractions. The utility-fitness model suggests that evaluation needs to move from ‘usefulness’ measures to utility functions that incorporate the long-term evolution and survival of an artefact in its design landscape. In this paper, we interpret a process of innovative change taking place within a design system, in order to provide an empirical account of utility-fitness. We propose that the utility-fitness model pays too little explicit attention to technological-ecological fit, accountability, and robustness: Three ideals that were prevalent in the scrutinized empirical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gill, T.G., Hevner, A.R.: A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gregor, S., Jonas, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baskerville, R.L., Kaul, M., Storey, V.C.: Unpacking the duality of design science. In: Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dewey, J.: Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. H. Holt and Company, New York (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23, 67–94 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 1–28 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sjöström, J.: Designing Information Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hevner, A.R.: A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cryer, J.: Resemble.js: Image analysis and comparison, http://huddle.github.io/Resemble.js/

  12. Krippendorff, K.: The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin, R.C.: Design Principles and Design Patterns (2000), http://www.objectmentor.com

  14. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, IEEE Std. 610.12. (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shahrokni, A., Feldt, R.: A systematic review of software robustness. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55, 1–17 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weitzner, D.J., Abelson, H., Berners-Lee, T., Feigenbaum, J., Hendler, J., Sussman, G.J.: Information accountability. Commun. ACM 51, 82–87 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mustafa, M.I., Sjöström, J., Lundström, J.E. (2014). An Empirical Account of Fitness-Utility: A Case of Radical Change towards Mobility in DSR Practice. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds) Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice. DESRIST 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06700-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06701-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics