Skip to main content

Co-creation Patterns between Designers and Users in the Design Process: A View of Reflexivity

  • Conference paper
Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice (DESRIST 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8463))

  • 4544 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we empirically explore designer-user co-creation patterns in the design innovation process with a view of design reflexivity. This paper entails two propositions. First, co-creation between designers and users function as the core action in discovering and validating complex design information environments. Second, co-creation between designers and users can be identified by two reflexivity concepts: design reflexivity and role reflexivity. With these two propositions on designer-user co-creation, we ask the following research questions: (1) what do co-creation between designers and users characterize distinctive patterns in the design process? (2) How do designer-user co-creation patterns change a design routine in a design process? As an empirical approach, this study analyzed forty IT & design innovation project narratives and synthesized five designer-user co-creation patterns (two design reflexivity and three role reflexivity). The significance of this study is to open the importance of co-creation on the designer-user interaction, and it seeks to empirically explore the patterns of co-creation and suggests a theoretical / practical guideline for researchers and practitioners in the community of design process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C., Schön, D.A.: On organizational learning (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barki, H., Hartwick, J.: Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development. Mis Quarterly 25(2), 195–228 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R.L., Stage, J.: Controlling prototype development through risk analysis. Mis Quarterly, 481–504 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G.: Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Dutton, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G.: Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland Jr., R.J.: The process and product of system design. Management Science 24(9), 887 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P.: The forms of capital. [S.l.] (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L.J.D.: An invitation to reflexive sociology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buur, J., Bødker, S.: From usability lab to “design collaboratorium”: reframing usability practice. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buur, J., Binder, T., Brandt, E.: Taking video beyond ‘hard data’ in user centred design. Paper Presented at the Participatory Design Conference (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buur, J., Jensen, M.V., Djajadiningrat, T.: Hands-only scenarios and video action walls: novel methods for tangible user interaction design. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buur, J., Matthews, B.: Participatory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 12(03), 255–273 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P.R.: A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13(4), 442–455 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkasky, T.: Designing Experience. International Journal of Engineering Education 19(1), 9 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W., Schainblatt, A.H.: Commentary on “The Researcher and the Manager: A Dialectic of Implementation”. Management Science 12(2), 2 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies 22(5), 425–437 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P.: Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Umeå University (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P.: Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, pp. 41–77 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P.: Participation in design things. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.: Meta-design: Beyond user-centered and participatory design. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of HCI International (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E.: Meta-design: A framework for the future of end-user development. In: End User Development, pp. 427–457. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Scharff, E.: Meta-design: design for designers. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: The constitution of society: introduction of the theory of structuration. Univ. of California Press (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Polity press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: Interaction ritual; essays in face-to-face behavior. Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: Strategic interaction. Blackwell, Oxford (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J.: Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education 19(1), 62 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, T.L.: Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review 24(3), 472–488 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R.A.: User experience with and assessment of participative systems design. Mis Quarterly, 295–304 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, B., Olson, M.H.: User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Management Science 30(5), 586–603 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, K.M., Bostrom, R.P.: Personality Characteristics of MIS Project Teams: An Empirical Study and Action-Research Design. MIS Quarterly 6(4), 43–60 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G.M.: A theory of decision support system design for user calibration. Information Systems Research 7(2), 215–232 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyng, M.: Designing for cooperation: cooperating in design. Communications of the ACM 34(12), 73 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyng, M.: Designing for cooperation: cooperating in design. Communications of the ACM 34(12), 65 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyng, M.: Users and Computers-A Contextual Approach to Design of Computer Artifacts. DAIMI Report Series 25(507) (1996a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyng, M.: Users and Computers: A Contextual Approach to Design of Computer Artifacts = Brugere og datamater: En kontekstuel tilgang til design af edb-systemer. Aarhus Universitet, Datalogisk Afdeling, Aarhus (1996b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Communities of practice (1998) (retrieved June 9, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N.: Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Information Systems Research 16(2), 109–130 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N., Vaast, E.: The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice. Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly 29(2), 335–363 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marakas, G.M., Elam, J.J.: Semantic structuring in analyst acquisition and representation of facts in requirements analysis. Information Systems Research 9(1), 37–63 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, E.R.: End Users as Application Developers. M&O Quarterly 3(4), 4 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, K.: Program Development as a Social Activity. Paper Presented at the Information Processing 1986 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.: Designer-User Interaction as the Core of the Design & IT Innovation Process: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. In: ICIS 2012 Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Boland, R.: Boundary Objects as Action in Information Systems Development (ISD): a Dramaturgical Perspective Using Sociodrama. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. Paper 6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D.: Modeling Interpersonal Processes During System Development: Further Thoughts and Suggestions. Information Systems Research 5(4), 439–445 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Salaway, G.: An organizational learning approach to information systems development. M&O Quarterly 11(2), 245 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger, R.J.: MIS design: a contingency approach. Mis Quarterly 4(1), 13–20 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L.: The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 37–54. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19(3), 387–420 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publ., Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L.: Human/machine reconsidered. Cognitive Studies 5(1), 1 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M., Gero, J., Purcell, T.: Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies 21(6), 539–567 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, P., Vessey, I.: The effect of user involvement on system success: a contingency approach. Mis Quarterly, 91–108 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L., Anscombe, G.E.M.: Philosophical investigations. Blackwell publ., Oxford, GB (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Park, J., Park, HA. (2014). Co-creation Patterns between Designers and Users in the Design Process: A View of Reflexivity. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds) Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice. DESRIST 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06700-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06701-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics