Skip to main content

Risk-Adjusted On-line Portfolio Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operations Research Proceedings 2013

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

Abstract

The objective of on-line portfolio selection is to design provably good algorithms with respect to some on-line or offline benchmark. Existing algorithms do not consider ‘trading risk’. We present a novel risk-adjusted portfolio selection algorithm (RAPS). RAPS incorporates the ‘trading risk’ in terms of the maximum possible loss. We show that RAPS performs provably ‘as well as’ the Universal Portfolio (UP) [4] in the worst-case. We empirically evaluate RAPS on historical NYSE data. Results show that RAPS is able to beat BCRP as well as several ‘follow-the-winner’ algorithms from the literature, including UP. We conclude that RAPS outperforms in case the assets in the portfolio follow a positive trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.cs.bme.hu/~oti/portfolio/data/nyseold.zip

References

  1. Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R., & Gogan, V. (2000). On the competitive theory and practice of portfolio selection. In G. Gonnet & A. Viola (Eds.), LATIN 2000: Theoretical Informatics. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R., & Gogan, V. (2004). Can we learn to beat the best stock. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 21(1), 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Lugosi, G. (2006). Prediction, Learning, and Games. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Cover, T. (1991). Universal portfolios. Mathematical Finance, 1(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaivoronski, A. A., & Stella, F. (2000). Stochastic nonstationary optimization for finding universal portfolios. Annals of Operations Research, 100, 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Helmbold, D., Schapire, R., Singer, Y., & Warmuth, M. (1998). On-line portfolio selection using multiplicative updates. Mathematical Finance, 8(4), 325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Modigliani, F., & Modigliani, L. (1997). Risk-adjusted performance. Journal of Portfolio Management, 23(2), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Dochow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dochow, R., Mohr, E., Schmidt, G. (2014). Risk-Adjusted On-line Portfolio Selection. In: Huisman, D., Louwerse, I., Wagelmans, A. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2013. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07001-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics